Pages:
Author

Topic: Bitcoin Deflation and Its' problems - page 3. (Read 461 times)

jr. member
Activity: 52
Merit: 4
August 17, 2018, 06:55:18 AM
#15
I like the blogs published by Bitmex. One of the awesome sources to gather knowledge around cryptocurrency.

In this blog they discuss problem and benefits of deflationary economics. https://blog.bitmex.com/bitcoin-economics-part-3/

To quote from this:
Quote
However, even if Bitcoin has solved this economic problem, perhaps it’s naive to think Bitcoin would result in a more prosperous economic system. Bitcoin is a new and unique system, which is likely to cause more economic problems, perhaps unexpected or new ones. After all there is no perfect money. It just may not be correct to apply the traditional economic problems of the past, to this new type of money. Although it may be more difficult, identifying Bitcoin’s potential economic problems may require more analysis and a stronger understanding of the underlying technology.

I agree that it's a new kind of monetary system and it would have it's own problem when it becomes well adapted. but economically speaking do we need this system adding to the complexity already existing financial system.

We still didn't discover yet all the problems connected with the deflationary aspect of Bitcoin. We are not enjoying some positive aspects, but the negative will pop up eventually.
legendary
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1441
August 17, 2018, 06:44:06 AM
#14
Quote
However, even if Bitcoin has solved this economic problem, perhaps it’s naive to think Bitcoin would result in a more prosperous economic system. Bitcoin is a new and unique system, which is likely to cause more economic problems, perhaps unexpected or new ones.

I would like to see a serious attempt made @ detailing what specific issues bitcoin could run into as a deflationary currency.  Smiley

One of the common criticisms aimed at deflationary currencies is lack of overprinting to compensate for errors made in budgeting. But then looking at venezuela, turkey and other nations suffering from high inflation as a result of fiat overprinting perhaps lack of overprinting inherent in deflationary currency can be a good thing.

Some also claim that deflationary currencies make loan processes more difficult than it has to be which has negative economic trends in small businesses and individuals having greater difficulty obtaining credit and loans.

Many experts and analysts say things and expect the public to believe them in blind faith without evidence. Its a dangerous precedent. Society could benefit from greater transparency and deeper discussion of topics like economics and finance which affect billions of lives.
sr. member
Activity: 896
Merit: 253
August 16, 2018, 03:49:39 AM
#13
I like the blogs published by Bitmex. One of the awesome sources to gather knowledge around cryptocurrency.

In this blog they discuss problem and benefits of deflationary economics. https://blog.bitmex.com/bitcoin-economics-part-3/

To quote from this:
Quote
However, even if Bitcoin has solved this economic problem, perhaps it’s naive to think Bitcoin would result in a more prosperous economic system. Bitcoin is a new and unique system, which is likely to cause more economic problems, perhaps unexpected or new ones. After all there is no perfect money. It just may not be correct to apply the traditional economic problems of the past, to this new type of money. Although it may be more difficult, identifying Bitcoin’s potential economic problems may require more analysis and a stronger understanding of the underlying technology.

I agree that it's a new kind of monetary system and it would have it's own problem when it becomes well adapted. but economically speaking do we need this system adding to the complexity already existing financial system.

Everything in this world has some flaws. But it is for us whether we want to it not and also it is up to us to improve its uses and for use to let ourselves be useful by taking an action towards it.
sr. member
Activity: 1946
Merit: 322
August 16, 2018, 03:14:46 AM
#12
Sometime i think thats bitcoin had down the news about thats bitcoin have hacked, its so sad whe i hear thats who make price deopped
Cryptocurrencies are safe to use and there is nothing risky or hacking activities if you keep your privacy secure. Now learn how you will keep your privacy secure us very easy and there will be nothing hacking activities around you. Use your wallet with care and do not share your pass key or password with any other person so that no one may know your gate key to enter into your home.
legendary
Activity: 3150
Merit: 1392
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
August 12, 2018, 11:13:52 AM
#11
Deflation is an interesting topic and it is definitely not brought up often enough. Fiat currencies are bound to fail eventually, because countries borrow money from each other and don't have sufficient funds to pay the debts. This makes the idea of simply printing a bit more money very attractive, but in the end it causes inflation. And if this country is US, it also probably causes a really hard economic crisis.
I don't understand, however, why the article op mentions is talking about naive bitcoin users who don't understand that deflation is bad. Yes, bitcoin is not susceptible to inflation because of its limited supply. However, I don't think it necessarily means it will lead to deflation. If bitcoin was the only currency then it necessarily would, but it is definitely not the case anyway. Btc price rising extremely high in usd will lead to spending less of it on goods, yes, but I don't think people are going to do that anyway. It's a tricky and confusing matter, but imo things might just stabilize eventually without leading to inflation or deflation.
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1292
There is trouble abrewing
August 12, 2018, 11:02:10 AM
#10
unfortunately those critics who are saying a finite monetary supply can be a poor economic policy, resulting in or exacerbating, economic crashes have ties to banks and their system and want to have control over printing money. which is why they see the alternative as a bad solution and seek to poke holes in it.

saying people are going to be unwilling to spend it because it is appreciating is assuming that bitcoin price will rise till eternity which is obviously wrong. there is a cap for everything even for bitcoin price. it won't continue to grow forever and it won't always give 100%-2000% profit per year. we will eventually reach a more balanced market when the mass adoption hits or at least reach a level where the adoption growth is not enough to increase the price that much. and by then we will see a better stability in price.

I tend to a scenario that currencies can be mined according to "no maximum number" restrictions, leading to stability and non-fluctuating prices.

i disagree.
when a coin has no cap (or maximum number) then you are introducing another extremity to that coin. and the arguments that were made here about people being unwilling to spend it and the coin not being capable of fulfilling what society needs as one of the quotes in the article says becomes true. because a coin with no cap will always continue to go down in value. and nobody is going to even buy a coin that can for instance buy 2 cups of coffee today and 1 cup tomorrow and not even half a cup by the end of the week.
hero member
Activity: 2702
Merit: 704
August 12, 2018, 10:31:31 AM
#9
I like the blogs published by Bitmex. One of the awesome sources to gather knowledge around cryptocurrency.

In this blog they discuss problem and benefits of deflationary economics. https://blog.bitmex.com/bitcoin-economics-part-3/

To quote from this:
Quote
However, even if Bitcoin has solved this economic problem, perhaps it’s naive to think Bitcoin would result in a more prosperous economic system. Bitcoin is a new and unique system, which is likely to cause more economic problems, perhaps unexpected or new ones. After all there is no perfect money. It just may not be correct to apply the traditional economic problems of the past, to this new type of money. Although it may be more difficult, identifying Bitcoin’s potential economic problems may require more analysis and a stronger understanding of the underlying technology.

I agree that it's a new kind of monetary system and it would have it's own problem when it becomes well adapted. but economically speaking do we need this system adding to the complexity already existing financial system.
It is the opposite, it is true that bitcoin and its low inflation nature will cause a change in the economy in the case that is massively adopted, but bitcoin in fact is going to simplify things up and not make them more complicated, for example the CPI is a measure of how much the prices have changed over the course of time to measure inflation but it has been shown by many that the numbers of the government are fixed an the same happens in many countries.

Bitcoin will fix that since there will be a very low inflation, this means that economic growth is not going to be as fast or as big as before but unlike the current growth that is fueled by inflation and that is not real the growth in a bitcoin economy the growth will be real.
newbie
Activity: 238
Merit: 0
August 12, 2018, 09:31:06 AM
#8
Sometime i think thats bitcoin had down the news about thats bitcoin have hacked, its so sad whe i hear thats who make price deopped
full member
Activity: 406
Merit: 102
August 12, 2018, 06:04:09 AM
#7
I dont think deflation will be a problem with bitcoin nowadays because we are still mining bitcoins. The problem with deflation comes when all the bitcoin has been mined and the supply of bitcoin becomes near to constant.
sr. member
Activity: 630
Merit: 272
August 12, 2018, 05:51:21 AM
#6
...
I guess it depends on what your definition of deflation is. But if you consider deflation to be a general decline in the money supply, then bitcoin's currency level actually never goes down.
...

In the long-term a general decline in the BTC supply seems pretty likely to me.
As soon as the amount of lost coins (people that die with their BTC, lost private keys
and other scenarios) is higher than the amount of BTC that is created as block reward,
we will see exactly this situation where the available BTC supply declines.

Therefore I´d argue that BTC is inflationary in the first few decades and later turns into
a deflationary asset.


Eventually, bitcoin should become a full-fledged currency. In this case, bitcoin offers will be stable because it will be its turnover in the economy. The lost coins and the lack of emission will affect the value of the coins but it will be a slow correction which will not have a significant impact.
sr. member
Activity: 658
Merit: 282
August 12, 2018, 05:24:44 AM
#5
...
I guess it depends on what your definition of deflation is. But if you consider deflation to be a general decline in the money supply, then bitcoin's currency level actually never goes down.
...

In the long-term a general decline in the BTC supply seems pretty likely to me.
As soon as the amount of lost coins (people that die with their BTC, lost private keys
and other scenarios) is higher than the amount of BTC that is created as block reward,
we will see exactly this situation where the available BTC supply declines.

Therefore I´d argue that BTC is inflationary in the first few decades and later turns into
a deflationary asset.

hero member
Activity: 1666
Merit: 753
August 12, 2018, 05:08:40 AM
#4
Bitcoin is actually inflationary, not deflationary.

I guess it depends on what your definition of deflation is. But if you consider deflation to be a general decline in the money supply, then bitcoin's currency level actually never goes down. There is a constant increase in that, each block that's been mined.

However, the level of inflation just slows down over time due to halvings.

We could see potential deflationary issues when bitcoin nears its supply ceiling, and the rate of lost coins exceed that of new coins coming in, but even then it's unlikely that it'll affect any single country as bitcoin is global. Besides, if bitcoin serves as a niche, safe haven asset in the future for those who want to save their wealth in the long run, there is nothing wrong with its supply being capped and potentially even decreased, just like gold. It's a store of value - after all.
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
August 11, 2018, 05:40:14 PM
#3
Bitcoin is decentralised digital currency which means it doesn't under control any kind of authority or government. It is an independent currency. And Because of this it is not globally accepted, many countries ban it in their country. Bitcoin is used for investment purposes but its high volatile nature produce difficulties. It is mainly used d for online transfer of money. In this fiat currency transfer in the form of bitcoin, but once transaction is done then it can't be reversed. The whole bitcoin thing runs over Internet, if virus corrupt the data or if hardware crashes then their will be no physical evidence to claim of your bitcoin.  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2506
Merit: 3645
Buy/Sell crypto at BestChange
August 11, 2018, 10:45:22 AM
#2
I do not think debt will be a problem in the case of Bitcoin. Limitedness will not cause the real value of debt to increase because more money can’t be created "as banks do."

Bitcoin has problems, these problems are not only technical, but I do not expect to stabilize as happens to gold, which leads to a weak economic system built on those currencies.

I tend to a scenario that currencies can be mined according to "no maximum number" restrictions, leading to stability and non-fluctuating prices.

thanks for sharing that URL. Smiley
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
August 11, 2018, 07:19:19 AM
#1
I like the blogs published by Bitmex. One of the awesome sources to gather knowledge around cryptocurrency.

In this blog they discuss problem and benefits of deflationary economics. https://blog.bitmex.com/bitcoin-economics-part-3/

To quote from this:
Quote
However, even if Bitcoin has solved this economic problem, perhaps it’s naive to think Bitcoin would result in a more prosperous economic system. Bitcoin is a new and unique system, which is likely to cause more economic problems, perhaps unexpected or new ones. After all there is no perfect money. It just may not be correct to apply the traditional economic problems of the past, to this new type of money. Although it may be more difficult, identifying Bitcoin’s potential economic problems may require more analysis and a stronger understanding of the underlying technology.

I agree that it's a new kind of monetary system and it would have it's own problem when it becomes well adapted. but economically speaking do we need this system adding to the complexity already existing financial system.
Pages:
Jump to: