First, bitcoin would not eat up currencies.
Second, bitcoin is a new investment for all people, and bitcoin has not forced all people to invest in bitcoin. People have a free choice to invest or not.
Third, bitcoin a new way to make money, especially from the internet.
I think many people in out there still give misleading information about bitcoin. They only think about bitcoin will lead to the financial frauds, but it is not. It depends on each people how they want to use bitcoin because bitcoin give an option to people.
I imagine if bitcoin and fiat can work together in every aspect of human, we could get a better life than now.
Topic: Bitcoin Eats the World, or Not (Read 350 times)
There are so many wonderful things that bitcoin can achieve but we need to be realistic in our predictions. Bitcoin just like the popular currencies we have in the world would have to evolve over time in order to make the real impact that most cryptocurrency enthusiasts wish yo see.
I do not think that Bitcoin will be able to eat up all the organizations and currencies in the world. It takes decades to replace the fiat and decentralized world, and Bitcoin is unlikely to do so. However, in my opinion, what should change the world will base on the Blockchain
No it won't, I think that we are just the ones thinking beyond the vision of bitcoin creator himself, the creator of this coin made it known to everyone that it is meant to serve as alternative to fiat and would be more useful within the network of those that believes in it, I mean within the people that will be a part of the 21 million limit that is set on it. It is impossible for it to take over the world because the world is too big and being controlled by world powerful leaders whom some of them would never agree to its usage while some of them would agree, but than God that it is an internet money, and will be more used by those who are technology incline. so that dream that it will eat up the earth one day is one that I think will never come through.
It is a great naivete to believe that bitcoin will replace Fiat or everything you said, what will happen is that bitcoin will have to live with Fiat and everything you said. Banks will always exist and Fiat will always exist. Now what we need to do is pressure governments to come up with laws that are good for bitcoin, we must not fight banks, we must not fight governments, we have to be able to just show the advantages of bitcoin and let people decide what they find it better to use more often
I used to buy into all of this maxi propaganda. It's nonsense.
Like all things, Bitcoin will have its place in the world, but it will not become everything.
I think OP is jumping already to the conclusion that Bitcoin would replace fiat in the future. I don't find any way that Bitcoin would replace fiat in the future or it would become everything, this will create chaos if my suspicion was right. There are lots of factors why Bitcoin would never replace the fiat system and it always will be used as a token of payment.Like all things, Bitcoin will have its place in the world, but it will not become everything.
I don't think BTC can ever replace fiat completely. Maybe it can act as a bonafide hedge asset to ride out the economic swings in the mainstream economy. Like how it did this July when feds cut interest rates by a few basepoints and BTC rose in value. But a complete replacement of everyday economy with tokenized assets in every sector is highly unlikely.
It is unlikely that bitcoin will eat everything, even if you use theory coherently, maybe that makes no sense. The fact that all countries in world have one authority that connects them all, whereas bitcoin does not have that, then how will that authority make bitcoin main while bitcoin has no clear authority.
Maybe if technology adopted by bitcoin will eat everything it still makes sense because the blockchain itself has been predicted by several banks and governments and this does not rule out possibility of replacing the previous technology.
Maybe if technology adopted by bitcoin will eat everything it still makes sense because the blockchain itself has been predicted by several banks and governments and this does not rule out possibility of replacing the previous technology.
i actually have never seen this "vision" be had by anybody who understands what bitcoin is. usually people who get too caught up in the profit making process and think bitcoin is something magical also end up thinking that it is also replacing everything including fiat, banks, and a lot of other things that concern blockchain!
the reality is that bitcoin is an additional option (a currency) that people have been having ever since 2009 for whenever they want financial freedom and want to cut the hands of the middle men from their pockets. it is not supposed to replace anything. it is suppose to exist to give people that option that never existed before.
the reality is that bitcoin is an additional option (a currency) that people have been having ever since 2009 for whenever they want financial freedom and want to cut the hands of the middle men from their pockets. it is not supposed to replace anything. it is suppose to exist to give people that option that never existed before.
There is a vision of Bitcoin where it would gobble up all assets in the world. Eventually, everything would be tokenized into bitcoins. First, Bitcoin would eat up currencies. Then, equities, then real estates. There are strong supporters of this vision.
Can this vision become true? I believe it would NOT happen. Such future would be a dystopia. When everything is pegged into 21 million bitcoins, we would all be slaves to the bitcoin owners. It’s also likely some would use violence to seize bitcoins from others.
Can this vision become true? I believe it would NOT happen. Such future would be a dystopia. When everything is pegged into 21 million bitcoins, we would all be slaves to the bitcoin owners. It’s also likely some would use violence to seize bitcoins from others.
This doesn't make much sense. Everything can be quantitized in bitcoin, the same way everything can be quantitized in fiat. That doesn't mean its "eating" anything. The value of things in bitcoin will change with the bitcoin perceived price. There was a time were a couple of Pizzas needed 10k bitcoin, and i think 1 bitcoin now would buy 300 pizzas or so... If it goes past Dec 2017 levels, it would buy 600 pizzas instead.
Did bitcoin eat the pizzas? No, Laszlo's family did
So you can decide to keep your bitcoin or your pizza. But the bitcoin won't spoil with time, so its your choice.
This article has no touch with reality. Bitcoin will not consume or replace anything, especially not the fiat currencies. The author of the article shows some utopia that is never going to happen and it certainly wouldn't be good if it did.
You are right that's why I do commonly neglect such shitty articles that has nothing to do even if we do try to apply it on future use.Bitcoin is being created for the sole purpose of payment system without 3rd party involved and no matter how it progresses it doesn't meant
to replace fiat system anytime soon.People are way too exaggerated to think up these things.
I used to buy into all of this maxi propaganda. It's nonsense.
Like all things, Bitcoin will have its place in the world, but it will not become everything.
I think OP is jumping already to the conclusion that Bitcoin would replace fiat in the future. I don't find any way that Bitcoin would replace fiat in the future or it would become everything, this will create chaos if my suspicion was right. There are lots of factors why Bitcoin would never replace the fiat system and it always will be used as a token of payment. Like all things, Bitcoin will have its place in the world, but it will not become everything.
I've read this before and this is just an idealized hypothesis that they use to sell you on the concept of Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies as a whole.
In reality, the entire cryptocurrency market is manipulated by a few large whales that have a majority of the cryptos under their control. The only reason crypto prices go up and down is because of these people playing with their toy money. So whether or not Bitcoin would eat the world is not known, it has certainly eaten a lot of human heads already haha
In reality, the entire cryptocurrency market is manipulated by a few large whales that have a majority of the cryptos under their control. The only reason crypto prices go up and down is because of these people playing with their toy money. So whether or not Bitcoin would eat the world is not known, it has certainly eaten a lot of human heads already haha
I know for sure that bitcoin is going to become the mainstream of the economic sector of the world, but to say bitcoin is going to eat up all aspect of our financial and investment sector is not realistic at all.
If there's something Bitcoin eats, it can only be energy. I don't think there is any consumption other than bitcoin energy consumption.
Bitcoin has always been developed to serve as a alternative payment option and not to disrupt all other financial payment networks. So, if Banks and PayPal are exploiting their customers, then Bitcoin would offer them an alternative payment option. People should have a choice between more than one option that are forced on them by their government.
People will chose the payment option that suites their need and if that need is total financial freedom, then Bitcoin would be there to fill that need. The moments when Bitcoin start to "replace" or "disrupt" these systems, then you will get a push back and resistance from centralized services that are backed by the government and they will use that to "ban" Bitcoin.
People will chose the payment option that suites their need and if that need is total financial freedom, then Bitcoin would be there to fill that need. The moments when Bitcoin start to "replace" or "disrupt" these systems, then you will get a push back and resistance from centralized services that are backed by the government and they will use that to "ban" Bitcoin.
OP author here. I don't believe Bitcoin would gobble up all other assets. But I think it'd be an viable Store of Value.
I think spending for small transactions would not be common. Bitcoin is used for transferring between different stores of value (e.g. bitcoin and real estate).
Quote
Spending should make up at least 20% of total Bitcoin transactions.
I think spending for small transactions would not be common. Bitcoin is used for transferring between different stores of value (e.g. bitcoin and real estate).
I used to buy into all of this maxi propaganda. It's nonsense.
Like all things, Bitcoin will have its place in the world, but it will not become everything.
Like all things, Bitcoin will have its place in the world, but it will not become everything.
Bitcoin is finate. Meaning once 1 person has it all. Everyone else has nothing at all. That's not freedom. The more of a sole comodety one has the more power to his monopoly.
I don't think Bitcoin will ever replace anything.
Even though the price of Bitcoin continues to pump in the future, I don't think it would be the case where everything we buy and we pay, we always include Bitcoin in it. Bitcoin will stay as it is in the future, the only thing I am seeing different in that future is that Bitcoin will be developed at that time and obviously, it's price.
Even though the price of Bitcoin continues to pump in the future, I don't think it would be the case where everything we buy and we pay, we always include Bitcoin in it. Bitcoin will stay as it is in the future, the only thing I am seeing different in that future is that Bitcoin will be developed at that time and obviously, it's price.
Though it feels outlandish, imagine a Bitcoin a few years down the line where enough people do have more belief in it than any other asset.
The dollar is still the most desired monetary unit in the world. Despite that it's on an unbreakable trajectory to worthlessness and always will be. That's how it's been designed.
If there was something else you could spend anywhere in the world that was on the totally opposite trajectory, why the hell would you want a dollar any more? If you wanted to preserve wealth why would you choose a stock that has its value based on the fortunes of one single company that you can only sell on one market open a few hours a day?
As long as there are governments there'll be fiat, but I think world eating is a possibility. Perhaps some day people will complain about having to convert their BTC to dollars to pay taxes. I've already reached that stage myself. I begrudgingly let go of BTC if I need the occasional necessity but I'd much rather not do it.
It may not be a very healthy or happy world but greed is the most powerful motivation out there.
The dollar is still the most desired monetary unit in the world. Despite that it's on an unbreakable trajectory to worthlessness and always will be. That's how it's been designed.
If there was something else you could spend anywhere in the world that was on the totally opposite trajectory, why the hell would you want a dollar any more? If you wanted to preserve wealth why would you choose a stock that has its value based on the fortunes of one single company that you can only sell on one market open a few hours a day?
As long as there are governments there'll be fiat, but I think world eating is a possibility. Perhaps some day people will complain about having to convert their BTC to dollars to pay taxes. I've already reached that stage myself. I begrudgingly let go of BTC if I need the occasional necessity but I'd much rather not do it.
It may not be a very healthy or happy world but greed is the most powerful motivation out there.
Quote
There is a vision of Bitcoin where it would gobble up all assets in the world.
Where did you find this vision if I may ask?Well, I do not see how Bitcoin was made to gobble up all assets.
I don't know how many people have phrased it in quite that way before, but many people, like Andreas Antonopoulos, for example, have popularised phrases like:
Quote
Money is just the first application
and that Bitcoin was going to be used to underpin all manner of other assets, including physical ones. It can theoretically do that, but no one is having much success at actually making it happen at the moment.
Jump to: