I don't like putting the blame on a major swift in price and a continuous bearish or bullish tren on a single event, the same case happening here, and when I see ETF, meh, who still cares about ETFs right now?
But the part of optimism is a bit true, poeple were making a lot of assumptions, and although 100k was pretty double one should stop with the extrapolation on past records and simply look at the amount of money needed to go to levels some claims of 300-500k. Yeah, bitcoin did grow xxxxx times but at the same time in all ten years, it has gone up by nearly 70k, so that would mean another half of what's invested now just to reach that 100k, and not counting a lot of other moves.
I thought 100k is achievable in some conditions, it was still feasible even in the last days of the first days of January a sudden pump everyone was waiting for could have triggered that move but now short term you can kiss that goodbye.
I mean, that's what happens when the price is rising faster than normally, no? Also, we can have an over-leveraged market and at the same time have actual adoption; it's not one or the other. We literally have public companies holding bitcoin in their balance sheets now, which has very likely affected the market sentiment quite significantly.
Poeple buying
BTC at x to dump it at y is not adoption.
If you would have poeple using it you would have more transactions in the chain.
If you would have people storing it in their wallets you would have more addresses with a balance, not just a 33% increase since 2019, and this including dust.
We didn't have that so-called natural growth last time, it was in my opinion driven more by speculation or plain hype than real adoption.
I think things need to calm down with the price for a while to let real price discovery happen, not fantasy projects or laser eyes, see where we stand and from where we need to build on.