There was a man, long time ago, who said it very well:
"Freedom is indivisible, and when one man is enslaved, all are not free."(Kennedy)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56V6r2dpYH8
Topic: Bitcoin Foundation a Socialist-Operation to undermine Bitcoin? (Read 2359 times)
February 19, 2015, 11:45:12 AM
As a socialist and lover and defender of mariihuana, I demand you either get out of the marihuana business or stop misusing the term 'socialist'.
Nazis where/are Socialists... Interventionism allways ends up in Communism oder National-Socialism. When a system claims control over more and more parts of our daily live, and if it's merely for "protecting the people of themselves" (which they in fact never can manage. Cause it allways end up in a very selective kind of moral reasoning > if you restrict Marihuana, you have to restrict alkohol, sugar...fat), it is just a matter of time, until their is immediate need for a totalitarian dictator, that centralizes every power in his hands. In fact this is then only the beginning of the end! That was it, what the socialist-plague in the middle of the century told us. If someone is a socialist, ok, i have no problem with this. As long as he keeps his dick of my face an not telling me what to do. He can make his things in private, but kindly put his hands out of my f.... wallet!
My dear stoner, you have so much to learm. I suggest you read some books, or if don't have the attention span for that, do some traveling! Go some places where there are not so many tourists. You will learn a lot about what freedom really means - that's something I can't possibly convey in a single forum post.
And in the mean time keep YOUR dick out of other people's faces - your ideas are an insult to all the people that actually fought for real freedom. Not your naïve 'don't regulate anything' survival of the fittest capitalist enslaving porpaganda freedom, but real freedom.
OMG so many contradictions I lose count.
BTW, Godwin's law is for pretentious people who also happen to be intellectually lazy.
What julien071 names as freedom means HIS freedom. And he wants to prove his subjective view on things as a categorical imperative. Thats in fact what the socialists do in our country.
And further, this is what democracy legitimates inevitably...a dictatorship of the majority.His freedom is freedom. Fuck Kant and his imperatives, for his views are what give btc tangible and ideological value....not yours.
Yes. His freedom is his freedom! And i respect that. <3
But centralism is something that undermines individual freedom in many ways. And most, if it's controlled by only a majority. That's the hole problem with democracy. It centralizes power, where there is no need for. Non-centralism is, in many ways, the most sustainable way.
February 14, 2015, 11:25:23 AM
As a socialist and lover and defender of mariihuana, I demand you either get out of the marihuana business or stop misusing the term 'socialist'.
Nazis where/are Socialists... Interventionism allways ends up in Communism oder National-Socialism. When a system claims control over more and more parts of our daily live, and if it's merely for "protecting the people of themselves" (which they in fact never can manage. Cause it allways end up in a very selective kind of moral reasoning > if you restrict Marihuana, you have to restrict alkohol, sugar...fat), it is just a matter of time, until their is immediate need for a totalitarian dictator, that centralizes every power in his hands. In fact this is then only the beginning of the end! That was it, what the socialist-plague in the middle of the century told us. If someone is a socialist, ok, i have no problem with this. As long as he keeps his dick of my face an not telling me what to do. He can make his things in private, but kindly put his hands out of my f.... wallet!
My dear stoner, you have so much to learm. I suggest you read some books, or if don't have the attention span for that, do some traveling! Go some places where there are not so many tourists. You will learn a lot about what freedom really means - that's something I can't possibly convey in a single forum post.
And in the mean time keep YOUR dick out of other people's faces - your ideas are an insult to all the people that actually fought for real freedom. Not your naïve 'don't regulate anything' survival of the fittest capitalist enslaving porpaganda freedom, but real freedom.
OMG so many contradictions I lose count.
BTW, Godwin's law is for pretentious people who also happen to be intellectually lazy.
What julien071 names as freedom means HIS freedom. And he wants to prove his subjective view on things as a categorical imperative. Thats in fact what the socialists do in our country.
And further, this is what democracy legitimates inevitably...a dictatorship of the majority.His freedom is freedom. Fuck Kant and his imperatives, for his views are what give btc tangible and ideological value....not yours.
February 13, 2015, 02:21:20 PM
As a socialist and lover and defender of mariihuana, I demand you either get out of the marihuana business or stop misusing the term 'socialist'.
Nazis where/are Socialists... Interventionism allways ends up in Communism oder National-Socialism. When a system claims control over more and more parts of our daily live, and if it's merely for "protecting the people of themselves" (which they in fact never can manage. Cause it allways end up in a very selective kind of moral reasoning > if you restrict Marihuana, you have to restrict alkohol, sugar...fat), it is just a matter of time, until their is immediate need for a totalitarian dictator, that centralizes every power in his hands. In fact this is then only the beginning of the end! That was it, what the socialist-plague in the middle of the century told us. If someone is a socialist, ok, i have no problem with this. As long as he keeps his dick of my face an not telling me what to do. He can make his things in private, but kindly put his hands out of my f.... wallet!
My dear stoner, you have so much to learm. I suggest you read some books, or if don't have the attention span for that, do some traveling! Go some places where there are not so many tourists. You will learn a lot about what freedom really means - that's something I can't possibly convey in a single forum post.
And in the mean time keep YOUR dick out of other people's faces - your ideas are an insult to all the people that actually fought for real freedom. Not your naïve 'don't regulate anything' survival of the fittest capitalist enslaving porpaganda freedom, but real freedom.
OMG so many contradictions I lose count.
BTW, Godwin's law is for pretentious people who also happen to be intellectually lazy.
What julien071 names as freedom means HIS freedom. And he wants to prove his subjective view on things as a categorical imperative. Thats in fact what the socialists do in our country.
And further, this is what democracy legitimates inevitably...a dictatorship of the majority. February 13, 2015, 01:27:39 PM
As a socialist and lover and defender of mariihuana, I demand you either get out of the marihuana business or stop misusing the term 'socialist'.
Nazis where/are Socialists... Interventionism allways ends up in Communism oder National-Socialism. When a system claims control over more and more parts of our daily live, and if it's merely for "protecting the people of themselves" (which they in fact never can manage. Cause it allways end up in a very selective kind of moral reasoning > if you restrict Marihuana, you have to restrict alkohol, sugar...fat), it is just a matter of time, until their is immediate need for a totalitarian dictator, that centralizes every power in his hands. In fact this is then only the beginning of the end! That was it, what the socialist-plague in the middle of the century told us. If someone is a socialist, ok, i have no problem with this. As long as he keeps his dick of my face an not telling me what to do. He can make his things in private, but kindly put his hands out of my f.... wallet!
My dear stoner, you have so much to learm. I suggest you read some books, or if don't have the attention span for that, do some traveling! Go some places where there are not so many tourists. You will learn a lot about what freedom really means - that's something I can't possibly convey in a single forum post.
And in the mean time keep YOUR dick out of other people's faces - your ideas are an insult to all the people that actually fought for real freedom. Not your naïve 'don't regulate anything' survival of the fittest capitalist enslaving porpaganda freedom, but real freedom.
OMG so many contradictions I lose count.
BTW, Godwin's law is for pretentious people who also happen to be intellectually lazy.
February 12, 2015, 02:57:54 PM
I suggest you read some books too. Something like: "The road to Serfdom". Or simply ask yourself, what Socialism does and has done to us and our society. You're maybe one of those guys, who think, that liberalism or the bad, bad capitalism is the origin of the ultra-inflationary money policy some countrys follow. So i say you: Think about your opinion objectively and you'll see, that this behavior (money printing, money-monopoly, centralization of credit) could come out of the communist-manifest and in deed makes the poor poorer and the rich richer. For that cause, socialism has nothing, but absolutely nothing to do with freedom. Remind Erich Mielke, Mao, Stalin or Adolf Hitler...THEY WERE SOCIALISTS!
Peace!
"judging by your not so fantastic use of the English language"
You judge me by my knowledge of english grammar, calling me childish, talking with me a waste of breath and telling me to read Thomas Piketty???
Thomas Piketty's book is full of misguided thoughts and straight lies. Why should i trust in that book?
How could one, with that opinion, judge a person? I'd say that person is pretty arrogant and i wouldn't trust his judgement...
February 12, 2015, 02:40:51 PM
I wrote 2 messages to you, but you didn't find it necessary to say something about it.
I didn't answer the first one because I took a long weekend off. The second called me a nazi, which is precisely the point at which I usually start to ignore any further content.But i had to ask myself, if your rating is made upon your experience with our product or just came from resentments you may have for us.
My rating came from previous experience with other "investment opportunities" that have been marketed here and turned out to be scam. Your offer was marketed in very much the same way, which led me to the assumption that it'd be better for others if they at least would be warned of a potential scam.The next evident point is, that in fact tax freedom is a true liberal value
I beg to differ.Dodging taxes has nothing to do whatsoever with liberal values.
If anything, it stands for a wrongful understanding of so-called libertarian values.
Further i think, that Bitcoin-Foundation is in deed a organisation that stands for centralization
I think you love to make assumptions based on no evidence whatsoever.I would even go so far as to say that you probably don't even know who the Foundation is or what they are doing.
They speak for themselves, not for me.
That's correct.We'll work on our trust-rating and methods of promoting our offers. We talked a lot about this in the past days and made a good progress i think. We really want to make this concept work and we stand behind this idea with full engagement.
Just a suggestion, separate your business from your private quasi-political motivation.You're not doing your business a favor when you throw around words like "nazi" or "socialist".
Second, write a good business plan, explain how you want to make money, what you're doing to make it happen, who you are etc. and I might change my mind about your investment opportunity. That's the bare minimum required for any serious business to ask for investors money.
It is not true that i called you a nazi. I asked IF you are "some kind of nazi or religious fundamentalist". A normal question in my eyes.
Second, if you arrogate yourself to know, what is "best for the people", than you are a kind of socialist per se. That answered my question too. And this issue has a lot to do with political motivation, because if there are people, that know what is the best for me, and force me to do so...they are totalitarians and i have to do something about, or in a not so far future we'll live under similar circumstances as the poor people in Northkorea have to live today. I don't want to live this way. Or do you want to?
If you call yourself "Bitcoin-Foundation" than you make a clear claim to represent Bitcoin. Or did i miss some fact?
And last, but not least: Tax-freedom has nothing to do with liberal values? Ok. That means that if you are forced to pay taxes, that is liberal?
A very questionable point in my opinion. That means Northkorea is liberal too??And because you made bad experience with other assets somewhere, that means that we are bad people too? In my eyes that generalizes, what you can, because of a lack of experience with our behavior, not generalize. But ok, it's your opinion... i can live with that. Now, that you told us your reasons, i can understand you much better and we will do our best to show you, that we deserve it to trust us.
Do you know about Richard Cantillon, know what Mercantilism is and what circumstances let it grow worldwide? Here is a nice article about him: http://wiki.mises.org/wiki/Richard_Cantillon
Thank you for your tips. You are right, we should explain our plans more detailed..
February 12, 2015, 02:09:24 PM
I suggest you read some books too. Something like: "The road to Serfdom". Or simply ask yourself, what Socialism does and has done to us and our society. You're maybe one of those guys, who think, that liberalism or the bad, bad capitalism is the origin of the ultra-inflationary money policy some countrys follow. So i say you: Think about your opinion objectively and you'll see, that this behavior (money printing, money-monopoly, centralization of credit) could come out of the communist-manifest and in deed makes the poor poorer and the rich richer. For that cause, socialism has nothing, but absolutely nothing to do with freedom. Remind Erich Mielke, Mao, Stalin or Adolf Hitler...THEY WERE SOCIALISTS!
Peace!
My dear stoner, judging by your not so fantastic use of the English language, and your utterly absurd statement that Hitler was a socialist, I'm quite sure that you are still the one who really really needs to start to read some books. Or maybe just watch the History Channel. Please do realise that Nazism actually existed and millions of people were murdered in the most terrible way. Neo-nazi's still exist today - in fact they were active in my home town not two days ago. Spreading their rightwing (not leftwing) vile and hatemongering propaganda.
Even more people were murdered by Stalin. Like Hitler, what that man stood for can hardly be called socialist ideals.
I''m probably wasting my breath here but I want to point out that your childish and ill-informed ramblings are quite insulting.
If you really want to know more about the poor getting poorer and rich richer, I suggest you read 'Capitalism in the 21st century'. It's a bit long but not too hard to read.
February 12, 2015, 06:51:05 AM
Nazis where/are Socialists... Interventionism allways ends up in Communism oder National-Socialism.
wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_lawQuote
"As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1"
This discussion had a probability of 1 when it started February 12, 2015, 06:49:07 AM
I wrote 2 messages to you, but you didn't find it necessary to say something about it.
I didn't answer the first one because I took a long weekend off. The second called me a nazi, which is precisely the point at which I usually start to ignore any further content.But i had to ask myself, if your rating is made upon your experience with our product or just came from resentments you may have for us.
My rating came from previous experience with other "investment opportunities" that have been marketed here and turned out to be scam. Your offer was marketed in very much the same way, which led me to the assumption that it'd be better for others if they at least would be warned of a potential scam.The next evident point is, that in fact tax freedom is a true liberal value
I beg to differ.Dodging taxes has nothing to do whatsoever with liberal values.
If anything, it stands for a wrongful understanding of so-called libertarian values.
Further i think, that Bitcoin-Foundation is in deed a organisation that stands for centralization
I think you love to make assumptions based on no evidence whatsoever.I would even go so far as to say that you probably don't even know who the Foundation is or what they are doing.
They speak for themselves, not for me.
That's correct.We'll work on our trust-rating and methods of promoting our offers. We talked a lot about this in the past days and made a good progress i think. We really want to make this concept work and we stand behind this idea with full engagement.
Just a suggestion, separate your business from your private quasi-political motivation.You're not doing your business a favor when you throw around words like "nazi" or "socialist".
Second, write a good business plan, explain how you want to make money, what you're doing to make it happen, who you are etc. and I might change my mind about your investment opportunity. That's the bare minimum required for any serious business to ask for investors money.
February 11, 2015, 07:55:43 PM
As a socialist and lover and defender of mariihuana, I demand you either get out of the marihuana business or stop misusing the term 'socialist'.
Nazis where/are Socialists... Interventionism allways ends up in Communism oder National-Socialism. When a system claims control over more and more parts of our daily live, and if it's merely for "protecting the people of themselves" (which they in fact never can manage. Cause it allways end up in a very selective kind of moral reasoning > if you restrict Marihuana, you have to restrict alkohol, sugar...fat), it is just a matter of time, until their is immediate need for a totalitarian dictator, that centralizes every power in his hands. In fact this is then only the beginning of the end! That was it, what the socialist-plague in the middle of the century told us. If someone is a socialist, ok, i have no problem with this. As long as he keeps his dick of my face an not telling me what to do. He can make his things in private, but kindly put his hands out of my f.... wallet!
My dear stoner, you have so much to learm. I suggest you read some books, or if don't have the attention span for that, do some traveling! Go some places where there are not so many tourists. You will learn a lot about what freedom really means - that's something I can't possibly convey in a single forum post.
And in the mean time keep YOUR dick out of other people's faces - your ideas are an insult to all the people that actually fought for real freedom. Not your naïve 'don't regulate anything' survival of the fittest capitalist enslaving porpaganda freedom, but real freedom.
I suggest you read some books too. Something like: "The road to Serfdom". Or simply ask yourself, what Socialism does and has done to us and our society. You're maybe one of those guys, who think, that liberalism or the bad, bad capitalism is the origin of the ultra-inflationary money policy some countrys follow. So i say you: Think about your opinion objectively and you'll see, that this behavior (money printing, money-monopoly, centralization of credit) could come out of the communist-manifest and in deed makes the poor poorer and the rich richer. For that cause, socialism has nothing, but absolutely nothing to do with freedom. Remind Erich Mielke, Mao, Stalin or Adolf Hitler...THEY WERE SOCIALISTS!
Peace!
February 11, 2015, 07:51:20 PM
Nazis where/are Socialists... Interventionism allways ends up in Communism oder National-Socialism.
February 11, 2015, 07:44:40 PM
After a long weekend, I find PMs in my inbox calling me a Nazi and this thread.
Ah, the heartwarming cosyfireplace stake bitcointalk is 
I did not give you a negative trust rating because of the product you offered, but for the means by which you tried to promote it.
As a (imho) experienced bitcointalk user, I took the liberty to judge your offer as a potential scam and ponzi scheme.
Also, I expressed my concerns about your promise of tax-free gains.
I explained that in the thread, as you might or might not have read before it was deleted.
Without further evidence of your claims, I will stand by my negative rating.
I am absolutely willing to remove my negative rating once I see considerable evidence against my judgement.
Also, please feel free to leave negative feedback for me yourself if you feel misjudged, or if you consider my judgements inappropriate.
Second, my trust ratings here do not reflect the opinions of the Foundation or other members of the Foundation.
Third, WTF have you been smoking?
Ah, the heartwarming cosy
We are registered on this forum since 3 days. On day 2 a Bitcoin-Foundation member
gave us a extremly negative trust-rating. We gave him no reason for this!
Was it because of the product we're offering?
Unfortunately, the thread no longer exists (possibly because I reported it).gave us a extremly negative trust-rating. We gave him no reason for this!
Was it because of the product we're offering?
I did not give you a negative trust rating because of the product you offered, but for the means by which you tried to promote it.
As a (imho) experienced bitcointalk user, I took the liberty to judge your offer as a potential scam and ponzi scheme.
Also, I expressed my concerns about your promise of tax-free gains.
I explained that in the thread, as you might or might not have read before it was deleted.
Is this a case of legit oppinion for a product, or is it a interventionist move to talk down
a eventual undermining of bitcoin by a 100% legit project, named "Marihuana-Stocks"?
I made the private decision to use the trust system on this forum to warn others about potentially "scammy" "investment opportunities".a eventual undermining of bitcoin by a 100% legit project, named "Marihuana-Stocks"?
Without further evidence of your claims, I will stand by my negative rating.
I am absolutely willing to remove my negative rating once I see considerable evidence against my judgement.
Also, please feel free to leave negative feedback for me yourself if you feel misjudged, or if you consider my judgements inappropriate.
And here my question again: Is Bitcoin-Foundation a socialist operation? Do the murder everything bitcoin is standing for?
First of all, I am not a representative of the Bitcoin Foundation, but a mere mortal member. Second, my trust ratings here do not reflect the opinions of the Foundation or other members of the Foundation.
Third, WTF have you been smoking?
How nice to hear a statement about your rating.I wrote 2 messages to you, but you didn't find it necessary to say something about it. Which is ok and your legit choice. It's your opinion and i respect that. But i had to ask myself, if your rating is made upon your experience with our product or just came from resentments you may have for us.
The next evident point is, that in fact tax freedom is a true liberal value and i think, everybody should decide by himself, if he, or if he not want to pay taxes for something. If that decision is made pro taxes, that is ok and respectable too, but if that payment is forced and someone can't put the payment in context with concrete services (and that may be the case in large parts of this world) then he should have the freedom to do so. If i order a pizza today, i will pay the bill voluntarily, because i ordered it and i demanded that service. If i'm forced to pay taxes without a specific demand for a service or if i even don't get any service but the financing of a totalitarian regime..wouldn't it be legit to boycott any payment of further taxes? Because we said "No Taxes" that doesn't mean that someone is forced to don't pay them. He could if he wants to do so, but he must not!
Further i think, that Bitcoin-Foundation is in deed a organisation that stands for centralization, which is absolutely contrary to the BTC idea, and arrogate themselves to speak for the whole community, where there is in fact no consensus. They speak for themselves, not for me.
I won't leave a negative trust rating for you, why should i? Like i said: It is your opinion and that is 100 percent legit. BUT my following questions were legit too and i found it worth to talk about. Like you can read, i'm not alone with my thoughts.
I think we can, yes we should talk about everything and shouldn't forget any aspect of such important issues. Every opinion is worth to talk about.We'll work on our trust-rating and methods of promoting our offers. We talked a lot about this in the past days and made a good progress i think. We really want to make this concept work and we stand behind this idea with full engagement.
I hope you'll hear a lot from us in the next months an change your mind on our credibility.
<3
February 10, 2015, 10:30:15 AM
After a long weekend, I find PMs in my inbox calling me a Nazi and this thread.
Ah, the heartwarming cosyfireplace stake bitcointalk is
I did not give you a negative trust rating because of the product you offered, but for the means by which you tried to promote it.
As a (imho) experienced bitcointalk user, I took the liberty to judge your offer as a potential scam and ponzi scheme.
Also, I expressed my concerns about your promise of tax-free gains.
I explained that in the thread, as you might or might not have read before it was deleted.
Without further evidence of your claims, I will stand by my negative rating.
I am absolutely willing to remove my negative rating once I see considerable evidence against my judgement.
Also, please feel free to leave negative feedback for me yourself if you feel misjudged, or if you consider my judgements inappropriate.
Second, my trust ratings here do not reflect the opinions of the Foundation or other members of the Foundation.
Third, WTF have you been smoking?
Ah, the heartwarming cosy
We are registered on this forum since 3 days. On day 2 a Bitcoin-Foundation member
gave us a extremly negative trust-rating. We gave him no reason for this!
Was it because of the product we're offering?
Unfortunately, the thread no longer exists (possibly because I reported it).gave us a extremly negative trust-rating. We gave him no reason for this!
Was it because of the product we're offering?
I did not give you a negative trust rating because of the product you offered, but for the means by which you tried to promote it.
As a (imho) experienced bitcointalk user, I took the liberty to judge your offer as a potential scam and ponzi scheme.
Also, I expressed my concerns about your promise of tax-free gains.
I explained that in the thread, as you might or might not have read before it was deleted.
Is this a case of legit oppinion for a product, or is it a interventionist move to talk down
a eventual undermining of bitcoin by a 100% legit project, named "Marihuana-Stocks"?
I made the private decision to use the trust system on this forum to warn others about potentially "scammy" "investment opportunities".a eventual undermining of bitcoin by a 100% legit project, named "Marihuana-Stocks"?
Without further evidence of your claims, I will stand by my negative rating.
I am absolutely willing to remove my negative rating once I see considerable evidence against my judgement.
Also, please feel free to leave negative feedback for me yourself if you feel misjudged, or if you consider my judgements inappropriate.
And here my question again: Is Bitcoin-Foundation a socialist operation? Do the murder everything bitcoin is standing for?
First of all, I am not a representative of the Bitcoin Foundation, but a mere mortal member. Second, my trust ratings here do not reflect the opinions of the Foundation or other members of the Foundation.
Third, WTF have you been smoking?
February 09, 2015, 06:01:09 PM
We are registered on this forum since 3 days. On day 2 a Bitcoin-Foundation member
gave us a extremly negative trust-rating. We gave him no reason for this!
...
And here my question again: Is Bitcoin-Foundation a socialist operation? Do the murder everything bitcoin is standing for?
gave us a extremly negative trust-rating. We gave him no reason for this!
...
And here my question again: Is Bitcoin-Foundation a socialist operation? Do the murder everything bitcoin is standing for?
So you feel attacked by the Bitcoin foundation just because qwk has "Bitcoin Foundation Member" in his profile?
If he had "I like turtles" in his personal message, would you claim that turtle-loving socialist are plotting to destroy bitcoin/marijuana/free market?
You know he doesn't represent TBF? You know that anyone can become member?
February 09, 2015, 05:29:44 PM
As a socialist and lover and defender of mariihuana, I demand you either get out of the marihuana business or stop misusing the term 'socialist'.
Nazis where/are Socialists... Interventionism allways ends up in Communism oder National-Socialism. When a system claims control over more and more parts of our daily live, and if it's merely for "protecting the people of themselves" (which they in fact never can manage. Cause it allways end up in a very selective kind of moral reasoning > if you restrict Marihuana, you have to restrict alkohol, sugar...fat), it is just a matter of time, until their is immediate need for a totalitarian dictator, that centralizes every power in his hands. In fact this is then only the beginning of the end! That was it, what the socialist-plague in the middle of the century told us. If someone is a socialist, ok, i have no problem with this. As long as he keeps his dick of my face an not telling me what to do. He can make his things in private, but kindly put his hands out of my f.... wallet!
My dear stoner, you have so much to learm. I suggest you read some books, or if don't have the attention span for that, do some traveling! Go some places where there are not so many tourists. You will learn a lot about what freedom really means - that's something I can't possibly convey in a single forum post.
And in the mean time keep YOUR dick out of other people's faces - your ideas are an insult to all the people that actually fought for real freedom. Not your naïve 'don't regulate anything' survival of the fittest capitalist enslaving porpaganda freedom, but real freedom.
February 09, 2015, 05:14:56 PM
Bitcoin used to be free an unregulated. It is time for new services. Ones, which aren't available with fiat or generally, in this totalitarian Nazi-Regime-State..
February 08, 2015, 06:10:00 PM
I knew it! So what can we do about it? Will we delegate our future and freedom into the hands of some totalitarians?
So what can we do about it? Will we delegate our future and freedom into the hands of some totalitarians?What do we do about it....good question.
Advertise bitcoin for what it really is and get others to follow and realize....we will take back our sacred digital homeland from them....
Bitcoin is FREE and Unregulated....it is a currency...it is digital gold......it is freedom....praise be to ALLAH
BTW, let's make a petition to deport Preet Bharara!
February 08, 2015, 12:19:39 PM
He's just a lowly member of the bitcoin foundation by the looks of it. Anyone can become a member, but just because he left you negative feedback doesn't mean he's speaking for the Foundation. I also don't understand how it's a socialist operation. There is no conspiracy here. The reason you got the trust is detailed in the feedback.
I have no access to the reasoning. What did he wrote?
February 08, 2015, 12:07:28 PM
As a socialist and lover and defender of mariihuana, I demand you either get out of the marihuana business or stop misusing the term 'socialist'.
Nazis where/are Socialists... Interventionism allways ends up in Communism oder National-Socialism. When a system claims control over more and more parts of our daily live, and if it's merely for "protecting the people of themselves" (which they in fact never can manage. Cause it allways end up in a very selective kind of moral reasoning > if you restrict Marihuana, you have to restrict alkohol, sugar...fat), it is just a matter of time, until their is immediate need for a totalitarian dictator, that centralizes every power in his hands. In fact this is then only the beginning of the end! That was it, what the socialist-plague in the middle of the century told us. If someone is a socialist, ok, i have no problem with this. As long as he keeps his dick of my face an not telling me what to do. He can make his things in private, but kindly put his hands out of my f.... wallet!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism
Really? > http://www.worldcrunch.com/opinion-analysis/europe-039-s-extreme-right-and-left-united-in-support-of-putin/russia-extremism-nationalism-ukraine-conflict/c7s15880/
How does Socialism differ exactly from National-Socialism? Even the Nationalism is it, that marks both. And not to forget Communism, that is even as totalitarian.
The word "socialism" doesn't even occur in the link you posted.
But the link contains such words as "Putin", "Alexander Dugin", "good contacts to the far right" , "extreme nationalism"...
Jump to: