Don't get your hopes high, guys. In this whole article bitcoin was mentioned 1 time. That means nothing and in fact that's pure speculation of the author.
It is nice that bitcoin is no longer outcast of the financial scene but get real - it is still infancy of cryptocurrency and a lot can change while gold and land have been in good standing since dawn of time.
Exactly, I don't see how a 3-4 year bear market in gold prices all the sudden mean its lost its place as a store of value. Hello, its only been used as a currency/store of value/investment for THOUSANDS of years, much longer than ANY paper currency.
BTC on the other hand has only been around for just a few years, and I dont see people selling their land in droves for btc. I mean really, btc may have a current price that seems high, that doesn't mean its necessarily that valuable in terms of real life value.
No one in their right mind can call btc a store of value, when it hasn't been around long enough to even be considered in the same category as land/gold.