Topic: Bitcoin in Obama's second term? (Read 2593 times)

1. His campaign is much more focused on military and monetary issues.
2. Sarcasm is sarcastic.
3. Assasinations, but that takes heroes wiling to be killed as "traitors".

1. i don't, but it's part of his campaign
2. this post was incredibly sarcastic and shouldn't be taken seriously at all
3. i just wish there was some way to restructure the global economy so that it's not just a giant pyramid scheme where the rich sit on top.

1) How do you envision RP accomplishing this?
2) Why do you think that is less likely if we continue the status quo?
3) The "fat-cats" are in a much better position to use chaos to their advantage, why do you think class war would end up bettering the lives of the 50% of americans considered low income?

That's it folks.  The internet is over.  It was fun.  Glad to have been a part of it.  I'm gonna go play NES now.  See ya.

PS:  Fuck you, Uncle Sam.

Just in the interest of widening and intertwining horizons I would beg the board's pardon and drop a couple timely links in this particular thread...both active today.

http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1678149

http://www.zerohedge.com/

yes, and hopefully before he completely dismantles the federal government and the 1/2 of americans who are considered "low income" fall the rest of the way through the social safety net, ushering in a new and historically unprecedented era of class division in the united states.

actually, that sounds like the recipe for class war, the only thing powerful enough to bring fat cats to their knees. bring it, paul!

Even in the off chance Ron Paul actually gets into position, he WILL be assassinated.  Bet on it.

Me too.  Couldn't have said it better myself.  Tune in?  Not anymore.  Turn on?  Only when you can get away with it.  Drop out?  A MUST: EVERY DAY I'M HUSTLIN'.

So then vote for ron paul

You have to understand just how corrupt and manipulated the system is here.  We are presented with a binary choice that is no choice at all.  It is a ridiculous, and very unfunny, joke.  I, for one, refuse to contribute to the false legitimacy of this farcist kleptocracy by voting for tweedle dee rather than tweedle dum.

You need look no further than the media's treatment of Dr. Paul to see just how silly it has become.

Will people along the old left/right fault lines still have serious issues to resolve?  Absolutely!  Particularly, it seems, around issues of procreation and gender, but we are never going to be allowed to work those out so long as they are an effective tool of division.

I have fucking had it.

I come from a land of compulsory voting, and that may be why, but I don't quite understand the sentiment behind that statement.

If only the noobs are voting, then who's going to be elected?

If the competent run for election and the competent don't vote, how will they ever be elected?

If the statement is a protest against the government in general, fair enough, but realistically your only real choice is to join the fray, assume power of the military, leave or put up with it. What do you expect to achieve by not voting?

This is the most intelligent thing I've read on this forum to date.

Voting = participation in the facade.  I have never and will never vote.

Just wait till it warms up.

This.

The reason it is called the TEA PARTY is because it was based off of the Boston Tea Party where they tossed Tea into the Boston Harbor in protest of the British tax on Tea.

What part of the celebration of that act promotes anything but a protest against taxes and a tyrannical government?

Obama WILL get a second term because Ron Paul supporters and true Tea Party patriots know that Mitt Romney is no different from Obama and will be voting for neither.

No One But Paul!

@Gewure

Dude, you have to break out of this obsolete right/left shadow play.  Up/down is the struggle, and the more the up can keep the down bickering over bullshit the weaker we are.

occupyanonteaparty bitchez

Okay, let me set the record straight on a few things here. Ron Paul is only running as a Republican because if he had run as a Libertarian (which he has done in the past) then he would have no shot at accomplishing anything. However, Paul's platform is more in line with the Republican party of years past, rather than the bullshit neocons that are running the show now.

Now, about the Tea Party bit. What the media portrays as the "Tea Party" is NOT what the Tea Party was meant to be. Ron Paul actually started the Tea Party movement when he was running in 2008. Originally, the movement had nothing to do with social conservatism. It was a movement to lower taxes and reduce government spending, but was later adopted by many extremist right wing Christians. But I digress. The Tea Party, although in its current state is ridiculous, has a just cause.

And yes, I agree with you on a secularized government, as does Ron Paul. He is a strict Constitutionalist, and that includes separation of church and state.

Ron Paul

..not much to be said here.

only (offcourse in capslock): WRONG PARTY

even if there are only to parties: FUCKING WRONG PARTY!

FUCKING FUCKING WRONG PARTY!

when it comes to competence, i don't mid if its Ron Paul or Barack Obama. i consider them equal.
As european fellow, i lobby for a liberal, smart, democratic and antiauthoritarian leader. Ron Paul fits that as good as Barack Obama. So i don't Mind, as long as it is not ppl like romney, santorum, gingrich or any of those rightwing creeps.

Ron Paul is OK, i guess thats a viewpoint many ppl share. He is old, wise and a thinker. not the guy for crazy actions, not corrupt. will not lead US into another war; stuff like that. its OK.

its OK like obama is OK. but nothing more.


.. and im still drunk, excuse me. good day. +

[edit] reading wikipedia just opened to me that his son is a tea-party supporter..

dont get me wrong, but its -crazy- stuff like that, that makes me think ron paul should not be president. teaparty. nothing to be said here. watch a video of some mobilsation and listen to what the people say. best add against them, isnt it?

i don't get all that conservative stuff in the US at all?! why the fuck does anybody want to preserve worths, the WASPs and christians and conservatives and whatever stand for? am i totally wrong and unpopular in the US if i claim a government should be 100% secularized?! ..

..

i don't think so.

 

word up

makes you think doesn't it

ever heard of Ron Paul 

He is what the GOP used to stand for before fiscal irresponsibility and the neoconservative movement took over.