The article blames the banks for the previous crisis and says that the risks are now in the area of asset management, but essentially it was the problem the previous time as well. Yeah, banks gave away credits too easily. But what really made the thing way worse where bonds of bonds of bonds! The bubble grew because of the new levels of 'bets' not on the real estate, but on other bets on the real estate.
i still don't understand why some people insist on saying or believing that bitcoin was created to "replace" fiat! bitcoin is the alternative not the replacement.
Will Bitcoin really survive the next financial holocaust?
since bitcoin is not yet corrupted by the government or the banks and they are responsible for the economic crisis, there is no argument about bitcoin's survival! it is obvious it will survive.
the only question that is worth discussing is whether bitcoin price is going to shoot up to millions because of the crisis or will it not be impacted?
Well, I think that in the long run it's a replacement, because it's a way better alternative. And that's the reason why I'd answer positively to the question you find important. Bitcoin is not like fiat, and fiat can be abandoned after it collapses. The demand for uncontrolled cryptos will obviously grow in that case, and the value will grow, even though it would not make sense to measure it in relation to USD anymore. We'd see that the value has grown from what we'll be able to afford for 1 bitcoin.