First Question
I've read somewhere that only 1000 individuals own nearly 50% of all the Bitcoins currently in circulation. This gives me some concern. I really like the whole idea behind Bitcoin, I think it could be revolutionary if my objective intellect has understood things correctly.
However, if Bitcoin were to take off, and one day (probably many years from now) be adopted worldwide, wouldn't these 1000 individuals literally be so rich they could influence the world like we have never seen? This is only the case if Money= Power. And wouldn't this mean that the rest of the 99.99999% of the population would be a lot less well off in the future than they are today due to the MASSIVE rich and poor divide?
Say for e.g there is roughly 10 trillion dollars in circulation worldwide today, would that not mean that people like the Winklevoss Twins (who have nearly 1% of all bitcoins) would be valued at USD 100 Billion. Is this not mad? Is this not what bitcoin was fighting?
Some people could argue too much power causes corruption. There is less equality. I mean with the introduction of Bitcoin and (possibly) the Outernet which is in development at the moment, this inequality could be mitigated, but who knows.
"Is this not what bitcoin was fighting?" No. Bitcoin is not fighting the wealth distribution problem. Bitcoin is fighting the necessity to Trust a Central Authority problem. Those people who have enormous amounts of Bitcoin may very have so much power that they could do some very sinister things if they wanted to, but what they cannot do is print bitcoins out of thin air, or tell me what I can and can't do with mine. IMO they acquired these Bitcoins fair and square, and they can use those bitcoins to make purchases just like all of us can. I see nothing alarming about this except for the fact that they can buy satellite laser guns and buy of politicians to pass laws they want passed, but these types of issues can be dealt with. The fact that they have a whole bunch of bitcoins is not a problem in itself. The difference is: if they want more they have to earn them, they can't just create them out of thin air like the Federal Reserve does and therefore enslave the common man to their wishes and whims.
Second Question
How would recessions be controlled? I understand there are many 'specs' to economics, but if we were to delve into a recession, who would be there to help ease things? What about things like quantitive easing. With bitcoin, no central authority is control of money, which is AWESOME don't get me wrong, but I think it is human nature to desire some sort of security, something to look up to sort things out when the shit gets real.
The price of freedom is responsibility. Recessions will not be "controlled" anymore than my household finances are. This fear is what created the monster we are now in the process of dismantling. We have learned that the threat of an occasional recession is preferable to the threat of Fascist Government growing like a cancer out of the power we gave it to be our "Trusted Central Authority" to protect use from the fear of possible recessions.
It is time we took the training wheels off and faced the risk of falling and scraping a knee every once and while. Especially considering these training wheels of ours have morphed into a robot with a 50 cal. pointed straight out our head!Third Newbie Question (Technological)
Forgive my ignorance for this. I'm interested in buying bitcoin at the moment, but I just do not understand how the payment system works.
Say for e.g I buy a bitcoin off an exchange like coinbase. I want this coin secure, and so want to now remove it from the exchange and have it in my own hands. I have now removed it from the exchange, but what is to stop them from 'copying' the dat. file so even though I have this 'wallet' they could still have the key to take my bitcoin whenever they want? Even though I have this wallet, the bitcoin is actually stored in the blockchain right? So all they need is my private key to take ownership of the coin.
What if I were to take this file and make a copy, transferring this copy to a USB stick? A hacker could still access my computer which is connected to the internet, and have a peek (i.e through a trojan or keylogger) and a take a copy of my address which stores my private key? Even though I have stored the information on my USB, which is not connected to the internet, there is still a copy of the file on my computer, which can still be accessed, am I right? So creating my copies of this file, for backup purposes e.g corruption or lost file, just increases the chances of hackers finding my wallet and therefore increasing the chances of my bitcoin being stolen. I just don't understand.
What you do is create an Off-line Wallet. You either find a computer that has never been connected to the internet before or you get something like Ubuntu and run it on your computer instead of your regular OS, from there you create your wallet.dat without it ever touching the internet or ever having the possibility of touching a corrupted computer, you then save your wallet.dat on a USB and keep your public addresses handy so you can send Bitcoin to it whenever you want. Then go to your Coinbase account and send those Bitcoins to your off-line wallet's address. As soon as those bitcoins are on your off-line wallet's address, nothing having to do with coin base can effect those bitcoins, and there is virtually zero risk that your wallet.dat can be hacked. You can verify whenever you want by looking up your address on blockchain.org that you have the bitcoins in your wallet, and when you are ready you can connect that wallet to the internet and load the block chain and you will have those bitcoins in your wallet to spend or transfer to other wallets whenever you please.