Pages:
Author

Topic: Bitcoin is archaic - page 5. (Read 2555 times)

legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
February 09, 2016, 03:41:00 AM
#4
you can accept zero confirmation, so it's a merchants fault, there is no real issue in accepting them, all fud, because if there was issue, then bitcoin was simple already died

anonimity is better than fiat, and that everything you need for noe, for better anon mix it with monero, it's okish for me that you need to work a little bit to have better anonimity
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
I ❤ www.LuckyB.it!
February 09, 2016, 02:56:56 AM
#3
I know it has all the network effects but it's a dinosaur. Transactions take forever, sometimes take days or take client reindexing which takes an entire day. there is little anonyiminiy. Something like Dash has to eventually take it's place. The question is when.

there are services that can improve the anonimity of the transaction, example mixer services, and for the transaction if you pay the right fee it won't take long time to confirm
legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 2472
https://JetCash.com
February 09, 2016, 02:36:07 AM
#2
I believe that the transaparency of Bitcoin is an advantage. Most people in commerce don't need anonymity. I can't think of a situation where I would need to conceal a transaction, but, the way the current governments are acting, that may change in the future.
full member
Activity: 128
Merit: 100
February 09, 2016, 02:17:11 AM
#1
I know it has all the network effects but it's a dinosaur. Transactions take forever, sometimes take days or take client reindexing which takes an entire day. there is little anonyiminiy. Something like Dash has to eventually take it's place. The question is when.
Pages:
Jump to: