Ok.. surely we'll never hit n, it's been under n for like... forever !
n>41
Topic: Bitcoin is never going to hit $35 (Read 7659 times)
Ok.. surely we'll never hit n, it's been under n for like... forever !
n>41
Alright, where the never 40 thread at?
I think we agreed it'd make more sense to just keep changing the thread title.
Ok.. surely we'll never hit n, it's been under n for like... forever !
There's no magic or jinx in terms of btc true value....
Alright, where the never 40 thread at?
I think we agreed it'd make more sense to just keep changing the thread title.
Ok.. surely we'll never hit n, it's been under n for like... forever !
Alright, where the never 40 thread at?
I think we agreed it'd make more sense to just keep changing the thread title.
Alright, where the never 40 thread at?
Lets get this guy outta here 
he's always wrong
he's always wrong this code is just as good as typical TA in this forum 
Loool. Code has ab out 10 mistakes
oh lol. few minutes ago, my script would have actually saved your prediction! haha.
this is going to be ballisticcccc
this is going to be ballisticcccc
i thought you mean it will never again fall down to 35.. right?
I know this would not run
fixed that for you:Code:
import requests, json
req = requests.get("https://mtgox.com/api/1/BTCUSD/ticker")
mtgox = json.loads(req.text)
from math import floor
targ = floor(float(mtgox['return']['high']['value'])) + 1
print("it will never hit $ %s" % targ)
req = requests.get("https://mtgox.com/api/1/BTCUSD/ticker")
mtgox = json.loads(req.text)
from math import floor
targ = floor(float(mtgox['return']['high']['value'])) + 1
print("it will never hit $ %s" % targ)
this code is just as good as typical TA in this forum
Code:
gcc fu.c
fu.c: In function ‘main’:
fu.c:6: error: ‘A’ undeclared (first use in this function)
fu.c:6: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
fu.c:6: error: for each function it appears in.)
fu.c:6: error: expected expression before ‘=’ token
fu.c:6: error: ‘fetch’ undeclared (first use in this function)
fu.c: In function ‘main’:
fu.c:6: error: ‘A’ undeclared (first use in this function)
fu.c:6: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
fu.c:6: error: for each function it appears in.)
fu.c:6: error: expected expression before ‘=’ token
fu.c:6: error: ‘fetch’ undeclared (first use in this function)
/* Forum bear updater */
#include
#include
int main(){
A% = fetch Mt.Gox_price (int ++1)
printf "The price of bitcoins will never reach %A !"
return 0;
}
Now we can always maintain a bear thread.
I know this would not run
#include
#include
int main(){
A% = fetch Mt.Gox_price (int ++1)
printf "The price of bitcoins will never reach %A !"
return 0;
}
Now we can always maintain a bear thread.
I know this would not run
Code:
gcc fu.c
fu.c: In function ‘main’:
fu.c:6: error: ‘A’ undeclared (first use in this function)
fu.c:6: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
fu.c:6: error: for each function it appears in.)
fu.c:6: error: expected expression before ‘=’ token
fu.c:6: error: ‘fetch’ undeclared (first use in this function)
fu.c: In function ‘main’:
fu.c:6: error: ‘A’ undeclared (first use in this function)
fu.c:6: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
fu.c:6: error: for each function it appears in.)
fu.c:6: error: expected expression before ‘=’ token
fu.c:6: error: ‘fetch’ undeclared (first use in this function)
/* Forum bear updater */
#include
#include
int main(){
A% = fetch Mt.Gox_price (int ++1)
printf "The price of bitcoins will never reach %A !"
return 0;
}
Now we can always maintain a bear thread.
I know this would not run
#include
#include
int main(){
A% = fetch Mt.Gox_price (int ++1)
printf "The price of bitcoins will never reach %A !"
return 0;
}
Now we can always maintain a bear thread.
I know this would not run
I'm sure i'll never hit 40, it's been under 40 for like forever!
Wow, the logic is very clear and easy to understand with this one.
i love the fact such a prediction will be recorded for all time as wrong
$36.0xxxx
$36.0xxxx
I'm sure i'll never hit 40, it's been under 40 for like forever!
i love the fact such a prediction will be recorded for all time as wrong
$36.0xxxx
$36.0xxxx
I'm so glad this post warned me that the price was never going to hit $35. Should the title be changed again so the OP can be wrong three times.
why is it going up so fast i don't understand
LOL. unicorns.......... it's all unicorns from here on out.
Btw, OP need to alter $35 to something more reasonable ------>>> $50
Bears will say otherwise.......
why is it going up so fast i don't understand
LOL. unicorns.......... it's all unicorns from here on out.
Btw, OP need to alter $35 to something more reasonable ------>>> $50
Jump to: