Bitcoin is no hedge against inflation - i unadopted it.

ivanovasmd

newbie

Activity: 43

Merit: 0

Quote from: ?? on ??

wait for when USD collapses or move to a country where inflation is 30% per year like Argentina Roll Eyes

I've been hearing about the collapse of USD for ages, decades now. It never happens, and I think it will not happen during our lifetimes. We will all be dead before the USD empires ever collapses. Sad but true.

BlindMayorBitcorn

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1116

This is starting to remind me of a 24 hour PoW shitcoin. How long will it be before the market can absorb 3600 btc a day. These miner dumps will last a crypto-eternity

Eotnak

member

Activity: 117

Merit: 10

Quote from: jbreher on October 01, 2014, 04:56:40 PM

Quote from: Eotnak on October 01, 2014, 08:46:29 AM

Quote from: jbreher on September 30, 2014, 05:47:38 PM

The possibility of fractional reserve bitcoin banking clearly exists. It is up to us -- those that understand -- to spread the certainty that a bitcoin and a bitcoinIOU are two different things. And to never accept a bitcoinIOU in lieu of a bitcoin. Only if this knowledge becomes universal, can we stave off the threat of fractional reserve bitcoin banking.

ahh, thank you. That's what I've been trying to get at. I'm from USA, and from what I've seen people do in the past and present, I've determined that we can spread word all we want and care to. Do it until the day we die, and all the experts will warn against keeping Bitcoin online and accepting Bitcoin IOU's. And it will amount to nothing because Bank of America can give out free ipad's with a new minimum BTC deposit account, and people will want to avoid paying transaction fees by keeping their transactions off the blockchain when demand soars past hundreds and thousands of transactions per second.

For that reason, I believe that the 21 million coin cap is a technicality, and the supply of Bitcoins in use will go beyond that very soon (by comparison) thus making the currency less inflationary compared to fiat, but not truly deflationary indefinitely as per the protocol. The market will determine the supply.

Perhaps. However, our current system has grown up through generations understanding that, should a bank become insolvent, the FED (through the FDIC) will make all depositors whole. And in the case of a systemic issue, again, the FED (through massive 'printing' of new 'dollars') will make depositors 'whole'. Though this 'whole-ness' will be in terms of dollars only -- not wealth or purchasing power.

It will be interesting to see how BoA's bitcoin dealings might evolve in the case where there is no central bank to backstop such operations.

Ten years ago, pretty much nobody understood the fraud of central banking. Today, an increasing percentage does.

Let us cling to our principles and our hope, and endeavor to pull the blinders off the next group of the people.

All true, thanks for the insight! I'll do my part.

blumangroup

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

'Slow and steady wins the race'

Quote from: Eotnak on September 30, 2014, 03:39:23 PM

Quote from: jbreher on September 30, 2014, 02:57:18 PM

Quote from: Eotnak on September 30, 2014, 02:10:50 PM

Thanks for addressing my question! I'm not sure I understand what you wrote, though. How do today's banks seize dollars that are not on deposit? Sorry if that's a stupid question, but I never studied any of this stuff in school.

It is not a hard concept to grasp. Indeed, it is so astonishingly simple that the mind recoils from considering that the system would ever be thusly structured.

Today's banks seize dollars by simply zapping them into existence, where no dollars were before.

I thought it was the government that did that. Printing new bills. The question was how do banks seize dollars that actually exist, not fractional reserve...I'm trying to nail down whether or not the possibility exists that Bitcoin will suffer from fractional reserve banking.

Seize is really not a good word to use. They give people an incentive to keep their money on deposit by paying interest and charging fees to take money out of CDs.

jbreher

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 1660

lose: unfind ... loose: untight

Quote from: Rishblitz on October 01, 2014, 06:28:56 PM

Every currency has inflation that's the nature of economics.

Ha. Haha. Hahahahahahaha.

Care to clarify your statement? What is your definition of inflation in use here?

Rishblitz

full member

Activity: 308

Merit: 100

I'm nothing without GOD

Every currency has inflation that's the nature of economics.

galbros

legendary

Activity: 1022

Merit: 1000

Quote from: jbreher on September 30, 2014, 05:47:38 PM

The dollars that the banks zap into being exist in the same sense that those notes in your pocket exist.

The possibility of fractional reserve bitcoin banking clearly exists. It is up to us -- those that understand -- to spread the certainty that a bitcoin and a bitcoinIOU are two different things. And to never accept a bitcoinIOU in lieu of a bitcoin. Only if this knowledge becomes universal, can we stave off the threat of fractional reserve bitcoin banking.

This is the key insight. Just like banks can't create more gold, they can't create more bitcoin. All they can create is bitcoinIOUs and that is a very different thing. If you don't hold the private key you don't really hold the bitcoin is the key idea to get across to newbies.

jbreher

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 1660

lose: unfind ... loose: untight

Quote from: Eotnak on October 01, 2014, 08:46:29 AM

Quote from: jbreher on September 30, 2014, 05:47:38 PM

The possibility of fractional reserve bitcoin banking clearly exists. It is up to us -- those that understand -- to spread the certainty that a bitcoin and a bitcoinIOU are two different things. And to never accept a bitcoinIOU in lieu of a bitcoin. Only if this knowledge becomes universal, can we stave off the threat of fractional reserve bitcoin banking.

ahh, thank you. That's what I've been trying to get at. I'm from USA, and from what I've seen people do in the past and present, I've determined that we can spread word all we want and care to. Do it until the day we die, and all the experts will warn against keeping Bitcoin online and accepting Bitcoin IOU's. And it will amount to nothing because Bank of America can give out free ipad's with a new minimum BTC deposit account, and people will want to avoid paying transaction fees by keeping their transactions off the blockchain when demand soars past hundreds and thousands of transactions per second.

For that reason, I believe that the 21 million coin cap is a technicality, and the supply of Bitcoins in use will go beyond that very soon (by comparison) thus making the currency less inflationary compared to fiat, but not truly deflationary indefinitely as per the protocol. The market will determine the supply.

Perhaps. However, our current system has grown up through generations understanding that, should a bank become insolvent, the FED (through the FDIC) will make all depositors whole. And in the case of a systemic issue, again, the FED (through massive 'printing' of new 'dollars') will make depositors 'whole'. Though this 'whole-ness' will be in terms of dollars only -- not wealth or purchasing power.

It will be interesting to see how BoA's bitcoin dealings might evolve in the case where there is no central bank to backstop such operations.

Ten years ago, pretty much nobody understood the fraud of central banking. Today, an increasing percentage does.

Let us cling to our principles and our hope, and endeavor to pull the blinders off the next group of the people.

Eotnak

member

Activity: 117

Merit: 10

Quote from: jbreher on September 30, 2014, 05:47:38 PM

The possibility of fractional reserve bitcoin banking clearly exists. It is up to us -- those that understand -- to spread the certainty that a bitcoin and a bitcoinIOU are two different things. And to never accept a bitcoinIOU in lieu of a bitcoin. Only if this knowledge becomes universal, can we stave off the threat of fractional reserve bitcoin banking.

ahh, thank you. That's what I've been trying to get at. I'm from USA, and from what I've seen people do in the past and present, I've determined that we can spread word all we want and care to. Do it until the day we die, and all the experts will warn against keeping Bitcoin online and accepting Bitcoin IOU's. And it will amount to nothing because Bank of America can give out free ipad's with a new minimum BTC deposit account, and people will want to avoid paying transaction fees by keeping their transactions off the blockchain when demand soars past hundreds and thousands of transactions per second.

For that reason, I believe that the 21 million coin cap is a technicality, and the supply of Bitcoins in use will go beyond that very soon (by comparison) thus making the currency less inflationary compared to fiat, but not truly deflationary indefinitely as per the protocol. The market will determine the supply.

jbreher

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 1660

lose: unfind ... loose: untight

Quote from: Eotnak on September 30, 2014, 03:39:23 PM

Quote from: jbreher on September 30, 2014, 02:57:18 PM

Quote from: Eotnak on September 30, 2014, 02:10:50 PM

Thanks for addressing my question! I'm not sure I understand what you wrote, though. How do today's banks seize dollars that are not on deposit? Sorry if that's a stupid question, but I never studied any of this stuff in school.

It is not a hard concept to grasp. Indeed, it is so astonishingly simple that the mind recoils from considering that the system would ever be thusly structured.

Today's banks seize dollars by simply zapping them into existence, where no dollars were before.

I thought it was the government that did that. Printing new bills.

I don't know where you are from. Here in the USA, 'dollars' are zapped into being by the banks - up to and including the FED.

Quote

The question was how do banks seize dollars that actually exist, not fractional reserve...I'm trying to nail down whether or not the possibility exists that Bitcoin will suffer from fractional reserve banking.

The dollars that the banks zap into being exist in the same sense that those notes in your pocket exist.

The possibility of fractional reserve bitcoin banking clearly exists. It is up to us -- those that understand -- to spread the certainty that a bitcoin and a bitcoinIOU are two different things. And to never accept a bitcoinIOU in lieu of a bitcoin. Only if this knowledge becomes universal, can we stave off the threat of fractional reserve bitcoin banking.

yayayo

legendary

Activity: 1806

Merit: 1024

Quote from: Eotnak on September 30, 2014, 03:39:23 PM

Quote from: jbreher on September 30, 2014, 02:57:18 PM

Quote from: Eotnak on September 30, 2014, 02:10:50 PM

Thanks for addressing my question! I'm not sure I understand what you wrote, though. How do today's banks seize dollars that are not on deposit? Sorry if that's a stupid question, but I never studied any of this stuff in school.

It is not a hard concept to grasp. Indeed, it is so astonishingly simple that the mind recoils from considering that the system would ever be thusly structured.

Today's banks seize dollars by simply zapping them into existence, where no dollars were before.

I thought it was the government that did that. Printing new bills. The question was how do banks seize dollars that actually exist, not fractional reserve...I'm trying to nail down whether or not the possibility exists that Bitcoin will suffer from fractional reserve banking.

Both do it. The FED prints physical fiat money that is put into circulation via banks. People deposit this physical fiat money into a savings account at a bank. The bank in turn can use the seized deposits as security to create a certain amount of nonphysical bank money (at a factor of about 1:10). That's fractional reserve banking.

ya.ya.yo!

Eotnak

member

Activity: 117

Merit: 10

Quote from: jbreher on September 30, 2014, 02:57:18 PM

Quote from: Eotnak on September 30, 2014, 02:10:50 PM

Thanks for addressing my question! I'm not sure I understand what you wrote, though. How do today's banks seize dollars that are not on deposit? Sorry if that's a stupid question, but I never studied any of this stuff in school.

It is not a hard concept to grasp. Indeed, it is so astonishingly simple that the mind recoils from considering that the system would ever be thusly structured.

Today's banks seize dollars by simply zapping them into existence, where no dollars were before.

I thought it was the government that did that. Printing new bills. The question was how do banks seize dollars that actually exist, not fractional reserve...I'm trying to nail down whether or not the possibility exists that Bitcoin will suffer from fractional reserve banking.

jbreher

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 1660

lose: unfind ... loose: untight

Quote from: Eotnak on September 30, 2014, 02:10:50 PM

Thanks for addressing my question! I'm not sure I understand what you wrote, though. How do today's banks seize dollars that are not on deposit? Sorry if that's a stupid question, but I never studied any of this stuff in school.

It is not a hard concept to grasp. Indeed, it is so astonishingly simple that the mind recoils from considering that the system would ever be thusly structured.

Today's banks seize dollars by simply zapping them into existence, where no dollars were before.

Eotnak

member

Activity: 117

Merit: 10

Quote from: a447513372 on September 29, 2014, 07:41:03 PM

Quote from: Eotnak on September 29, 2014, 03:14:04 PM

Quote from: Eotnak on September 26, 2014, 12:24:59 PM

Quote from: yayayo on September 26, 2014, 11:50:55 AM

Quote from: Eotnak on September 26, 2014, 11:18:15 AM

Again, I respectfully disagree. I think banks will take it upon themselves to practice BTC fractional reserve and "mint" coins for their users. 21 million cap: poof!

Banks can use fractional reserve practice on any asset you deposit at their scam shops. But when they do it with Bitcoin or gold, you can clearly prove that whatever thing they emit for your deposit is a (fractionally reserve) IOU and not the same as Bitcoin or gold. That distinguishes Bitcoin and gold from fiat money.

Bitcoin even discourages handing over capital to banks, because if you own your private keys and can do transfers yourself you no longer need to trust a bank to hold your funds and do it for you.

ya.ya.yo!

I'm not an economist, so explain it to me like I'm a mechanic. Bank A sends Bank B BTC IOU. Presently, bank A sends bank B fiat IOU as well, no? I don't see the difference. Only that I as a consumer have the option of saving and transacting without a bank at all.

Well, since no one can answer my question, I assume that I am right. The 21 million cap on Bitcoin is for true Bitcoin. Sheople, after mass adoption happens, will probably not want to be bothered with keeping their own private keys, and will keep their BTC in online services. The bigger the service, the more BTC IOU's they can use, hence increasing Bitcoin supply past 21 million. It'll be fun to watch!

even still $380 per BTC is insanely cheap.

There is a cap on the 21 million BTC that can ever be mined. This is part of the protocol. It is not possible for there to be more then this many bitcoin on the public ledger (blockchain), however you are correct to say that banks could "create" additional bitcoin via fractional reserve lending. This however is very risky and I don't think will ever catch on because of banks inability to seize bitcoin that is not "on deposit" with them

Thanks for addressing my question! I'm not sure I understand what you wrote, though. How do today's banks seize dollars that are not on deposit? Sorry if that's a stupid question, but I never studied any of this stuff in school.

halfawake

hero member

Activity: 490

Merit: 500

Quote from: jbreher on September 29, 2014, 10:46:36 PM

You state that as if it is the only reason. That would be a false assertion. There is another reason, and it is undoubtedly the most important reason to the banking class.

This reason is that inflation steals the wealth of the populace at large, and transfers that wealth to the banking class.

Well, yes. Arguably, that's true as well, but...the reason I stated is at least the public version that all economists would agree with.

jbreher

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 1660

lose: unfind ... loose: untight

Quote from: halfawake on September 28, 2014, 03:04:21 PM

Small amounts (2 - 3%) of inflation are actively promoted by central banks for one reason: to promote spending.

You state that as if it is the only reason. That would be a false assertion. There is another reason, and it is undoubtedly the most important reason to the banking class.

This reason is that inflation steals the wealth of the populace at large, and transfers that wealth to the banking class.

a447513372

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

DLISK - Next Generation Coin

Quote from: Eotnak on September 29, 2014, 03:14:04 PM

Quote from: Eotnak on September 26, 2014, 12:24:59 PM

Quote from: yayayo on September 26, 2014, 11:50:55 AM

Quote from: Eotnak on September 26, 2014, 11:18:15 AM

Again, I respectfully disagree. I think banks will take it upon themselves to practice BTC fractional reserve and "mint" coins for their users. 21 million cap: poof!

Banks can use fractional reserve practice on any asset you deposit at their scam shops. But when they do it with Bitcoin or gold, you can clearly prove that whatever thing they emit for your deposit is a (fractionally reserve) IOU and not the same as Bitcoin or gold. That distinguishes Bitcoin and gold from fiat money.

Bitcoin even discourages handing over capital to banks, because if you own your private keys and can do transfers yourself you no longer need to trust a bank to hold your funds and do it for you.

ya.ya.yo!

I'm not an economist, so explain it to me like I'm a mechanic. Bank A sends Bank B BTC IOU. Presently, bank A sends bank B fiat IOU as well, no? I don't see the difference. Only that I as a consumer have the option of saving and transacting without a bank at all.

Well, since no one can answer my question, I assume that I am right. The 21 million cap on Bitcoin is for true Bitcoin. Sheople, after mass adoption happens, will probably not want to be bothered with keeping their own private keys, and will keep their BTC in online services. The bigger the service, the more BTC IOU's they can use, hence increasing Bitcoin supply past 21 million. It'll be fun to watch!

even still $380 per BTC is insanely cheap.

There is a cap on the 21 million BTC that can ever be mined. This is part of the protocol. It is not possible for there to be more then this many bitcoin on the public ledger (blockchain), however you are correct to say that banks could "create" additional bitcoin via fractional reserve lending. This however is very risky and I don't think will ever catch on because of banks inability to seize bitcoin that is not "on deposit" with them

colinistheman

hero member

Activity: 907

Merit: 1003

Quote from: venlo on September 26, 2014, 06:15:49 AM

People like to call it 'hedge against fiat inflation' others said 'it's digital gold'

None of it is true. In fact it is misleading. Bitcoin inflates twice as heavy as fiatmoney until 2016 - after that it'll continue to inflate at the same rate as fiatmoney. So how can that be a hedge against inflation or compared to gold? It's a lie.

Bitcoin is inflating heavily with around 10% per year. This is causing negative feedbackloops like we see now and causes high volatility.
The high inflation in bitcoin also impacts adoption in a negative way. People will probably not adopt something that goes down 90% of the time to make a crazy rise (maybe) at one point for a few weeks and then starts declining again for ages.
Sane people will not adopt that.

So, can i ask. Why was it again we are having that inflation? What sense does it make? Why do we need it?
Is Bitcoin maybe just a plot to make big miners rich?

I myself unadopted bitcoin again for that reason.
I refuse to invest in inflationary coins.

your thoughts?

Interestingly the inflation in the number of coins mined (even with this creation being greater at the beginning with 50btc and 25btc per block), is still having a generally uptrending value if you take it on a span of years. So the price is still deflating even though the supply is inflating. Tell that to the dollar.

This year we can buy MORE things with 1 BTC than last year, and the year before. (take it on an average, and not the spikes)

The US dollar can buy you LESS this year than last year and the year before.

galbros

legendary

Activity: 1022

Merit: 1000

Bitcoin is not inflationary, it has a fixed number of coins. The rate of generation may result in transitory inflation but we all know where this is going to end, 21 million bitcoins minus however many are lost along the way.

Just like the price of gold fluctuates so will bitcoin's price. Speaking of which, more gold gets mined every year as well, still it's a decent inflation hedge.

The bigger issue may be that there isn't a lot of inflation to worry about in most developed countries now, so less need of a hedge rather than bitcoin not being a potential hedge.

Eotnak

member

Activity: 117

Merit: 10

Quote from: Eotnak on September 26, 2014, 12:24:59 PM

Quote from: yayayo on September 26, 2014, 11:50:55 AM

Quote from: Eotnak on September 26, 2014, 11:18:15 AM

Again, I respectfully disagree. I think banks will take it upon themselves to practice BTC fractional reserve and "mint" coins for their users. 21 million cap: poof!

Banks can use fractional reserve practice on any asset you deposit at their scam shops. But when they do it with Bitcoin or gold, you can clearly prove that whatever thing they emit for your deposit is a (fractionally reserve) IOU and not the same as Bitcoin or gold. That distinguishes Bitcoin and gold from fiat money.

Bitcoin even discourages handing over capital to banks, because if you own your private keys and can do transfers yourself you no longer need to trust a bank to hold your funds and do it for you.

ya.ya.yo!

I'm not an economist, so explain it to me like I'm a mechanic. Bank A sends Bank B BTC IOU. Presently, bank A sends bank B fiat IOU as well, no? I don't see the difference. Only that I as a consumer have the option of saving and transacting without a bank at all.

Well, since no one can answer my question, I assume that I am right. The 21 million cap on Bitcoin is for true Bitcoin. Sheople, after mass adoption happens, will probably not want to be bothered with keeping their own private keys, and will keep their BTC in online services. The bigger the service, the more BTC IOU's they can use, hence increasing Bitcoin supply past 21 million. It'll be fun to watch!

even still $380 per BTC is insanely cheap.

Topic: Bitcoin is no hedge against inflation - i unadopted it. (Read 5823 times)