Topic: bitcoin life expectancy... (Read 4772 times)

...that would explain the shortage of anti-capitalist skinheads on most campuses - too busy mining litecoins in their mom's basement.

lol, i like that anser 

win++;

MM is an inveterate troll...that's why I like him/her.

Of course hybridization tends to provoke the expression of positive characteristics, among them general intelligence.  Inbreeding is the opposite...it tends to produce racist scum who's populations are not self sustaining.

excuse me?

The IQ of a population has decreased, obviously.
 

The singularity will never happen in my opinion. Average IQ of population decreases as capitalism and interracial breeding takes place. The technology also loses quality, computers in particular not so well built like they were 15 years ago. Computers becomes more powerful in terms of computing and raw throughput, but the general population even struggles with copy-paste operations and renaming of files.

The noobs will damage Dyson sphere when drunk and majority of the energy from it will be diverted to power some unnecessary eye candy like Vista Aero instead of powering real computing.

But I dont see any real obstacles why Bitcoin system can not last for my lifetime and lifetime of my kids. It will last as long as internet and binary computers exist.

it is far and away the most powerful computing effort yet

I, for one, welcome our new cybernetic overlords

As long as the internet exists bitcoin will exist. You cannot shutdown P2P protocol, you can only corrupt it, as long as bitcoin keeps evolving we shouldn't be afraid how long it would last.

bitcoin is designed for longterm use.

There are fairly hard physical limits on storing the blockchain, and on the energy required to hash.  But practical considerations (like asteroid impact or thermonuclear war) would likely intervene long before they are reached.

I doubt that even a distinctly 'better' system would take over unless Bitcoin itself became thoroughly corrupted and useless though the latter could happen if the idea of crypto-currencies really caught on but the distribution of wealth in Bitcoin-land was such that very few people could obtain and use them.  After all, other crypto-currencies would (or could) have the same major strength insofar as they are kept solid via cryptography so the main thing differentiating Bitcoin from a fork is that users are fickle and this impacts value.  The core team's skill and disposition will probably be the biggest factor in determining if the corruption thing happens.  My current sense is that at this point Bitcoin has the mindshare and distribution to retain command of significant value in most circumstances.  If anything I would expect Bitcoin to 'back' other crypto-currencies as something of a reserve currency.

I'm actually kinda hoping for a world where different organizations issue their own crypto-currencies backed at least in part by user-support for various things which the organization 'stands for'.  So, for instance, I choose to use a currency issued by my local community because I like the community and wish to support it, and because a good deal of my spending is done locally.  I might also use 'EFF' currency because I like the work they do.  If I want something which someone is selling in a currency I don't normally use, I'll go to an exchange.  But this is all something of a dream-world to me and I don't really think it'll go down that way.

What do you consider "life"?

I do believe that, given that technological civilisation does not collapse, eventually a large part of the economy will be using distributed cryptocurrency systems. A currency system based on math and fixed rules instead of vague human promises or transfer of physical materials is simply a matter of technological progress.

Bitcoin will always be heralded as the first one that was used outside of academic circles. I also think that Bitcoin will have some role as "hub" in the trade between various cryptocurrencies, at least in the beginning. It won't disappear from one moment to another because there is a better successor. That's not how things work.

It may eventually be regarded as old-fashioned or impractical, or even nostalgic. Just as we're not using cars from 1900 but we're still using cars.

Eventually every single BTC will be lost forever as people lose their wallets through various means or their drives get confiscated by the FBI under kiddie-porn suspicions. 

You forgot to mention that every alternative that has popped up has fallen flat on it's face. This doesn't mean an alternative won't come out which succeeds, but let's not downplay the challenge presented by the current champion, Bitcoin.

Perhaps you neglected to consider that the singularity will bring....  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyson_sphere

This is why it's better done now than later. We only have 3 decimal places remaining until we must switch to 128 bits.

However, I assume it can still be done with a hard (as in, very hard) fork:

1. Agree on Bitcoin termination date, and calculate corresponding block height
2. Release clients that conform with new rules once past the termination date
3. After termination date, clients will use the block as a genesis block and begin a new protocol

<2 years.
already there are alternatives popping up that solve issues that bitcoin has, imho it's inevetable that the community will jump on that and drop bitcoin

42 years, +- 50 billion years

If this time comes it wont be a problem like the y2k bug. They didnt think the computer systems would be running for so long...
But more like ipv6?

Ooops my misstake...Calculating, only one more month! But I will be very nice and buy all your coins for $0.0001.

The important number for me is when, if ever, Bitcoin will become something I don't wish to support due to it's impact on the various societies around the world...as is the case today for the USD for instance.  I suspect that that could happen within the period of time when I will be needing to be actively shifting my assets around.  That is to say, within roughly the next quarter century or so.  Of course if a weakness in the system rears it's head than that day could come sooner.