Bitcoin Millionaires Should Start Looking into Renewable Energy

ThEmporium

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: Argwai96 on June 29, 2015, 09:32:37 PM

I have always had this idea of a self substantiating bitcoin miner with pure solar and wind energy

That would be awesome, if solar and wind energy would be used for bitcoin mining, I would be keenly looking forward it, generally now a days I am afraid to purchase any bitcoin mining device since it will eat up my electricity bill beyond my strength Sad

JarvisTechnology

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Quote from: anderson00673 on June 30, 2015, 02:28:47 AM

Quote from: Kprawn on June 30, 2015, 02:22:56 AM

We focus too much on Renewable energy... why not focus on developing Asic technology that use less energy, like these people did.
http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2014/08/15/german-startup-says-its-new-chip-halves-bitcoin-mining-energy/

Combine that with renewable energy and you will have a WIN/WIN situation.

Spreading the load and using energy more effectively is the key to success. http://www.coindesk.com/bitfury-light-bulbs-mine-bitcoin/

The problem is that mining profits are tied to electricity costs. So if they come out with a mass produced unit that uses 50% less energy, it seems to me that people would just buy 2x of them and we would be back to square one.

The real problem is how we get our juice. Here in the usa we use quite a lot of coal, so almost anything would be a better alternative. I think the best solution is to have government run nuclear power plants. Private run plants will always cut corners, leading to problems if not a meltdown.

In Bitcoin mining and updation of blockchain there should be continous flow of power, plenty of is being used for their updation and mining.
It is better to look forward for some renewable energy,which save some energy atleast to some percentage.

turvarya

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 500

Quote from: bryant.coleman on June 30, 2015, 09:17:06 AM

Quote from: turvarya on June 30, 2015, 09:02:28 AM

ad 1) Not true. It just seems cheap since it is subsidized

Definitely not. Even without any subsidies, nuclear energy remains as the cheapest source of energy in the world.

Quote from: turvarya on June 30, 2015, 09:02:28 AM

ad 2) You can not dispose of nuclear waste. You have to store it for thousands of years(not in the mood to look up the numbers) and take into account, what could happen in this time.

Nuclear waste is quite small in volume, and can be safely stored in remote and uninhabited areas for millions of years.

Quote from: turvarya on June 30, 2015, 09:02:28 AM

ad 3) You can say that about nearly everything. Bringing back slavery? Sure, it generates employment opportunities for lots of people.

No. The generation of thermal energy and hydro-power energy does not require as many employees as nuclear energy.

ad 1)
Ok, I am not really sure about that, but your graph is from the World Nuclear Association. That is definitely not a good source. They for sure, have hidden some costs. I e.g. don't see anything about insurance there.

ad 2)
That's just pure naive. You have to watch constantly, that it doesn't leak out. Or are you telling me, that it doesn't matter, when it leaks out in a remote and uninhabited area?

ad 3)
So, what about slavery?

hikedoon

full member

Activity: 143

Merit: 100

OR
Maybe we could do like Satoshi envisaged and build giant centralised mining facilities in cold countries with abundant hydro-electric and geo-thermal energy.
Wink

bryant.coleman

legendary

Activity: 3808

Merit: 1219

Quote from: turvarya on June 30, 2015, 09:02:28 AM

ad 1) Not true. It just seems cheap since it is subsidized

Definitely not. Even without any subsidies, nuclear energy remains as the cheapest source of energy in the world.

Quote from: turvarya on June 30, 2015, 09:02:28 AM

ad 2) You can not dispose of nuclear waste. You have to store it for thousands of years(not in the mood to look up the numbers) and take into account, what could happen in this time.

Nuclear waste is quite small in volume, and can be safely stored in remote and uninhabited areas for millions of years.

Quote from: turvarya on June 30, 2015, 09:02:28 AM

ad 3) You can say that about nearly everything. Bringing back slavery? Sure, it generates employment opportunities for lots of people.

No. The generation of thermal energy and hydro-power energy does not require as many employees as nuclear energy.

jonald_fyookball

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1008

Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political

Quote from: turvarya on June 30, 2015, 09:02:28 AM

Quote from: bryant.coleman on June 30, 2015, 03:06:03 AM

May be we should start using the nuclear energy. Here are the advantages:

1. The cheapest form of energy available, as of now.
2. No environmental effect such as deforestation and pollution (if the waste is disposed off properly)
3. Generates employment opportunities for lots of people.

That said, IMO, we should try to create ASIC chips, which are more energy efficient.

Are there seriously still people out there believing that bullshit about nuclear energy?

ad 1) Not true. It just seems cheap since it is subsidized
ad 2) You can not dispose of nuclear waste. You have to store it for thousands of years(not in the mood to look up the numbers) and take into account, what could happen in this time.
ad 3) You can say that about nearly everything. Bringing back slavery? Sure, it generates employment opportunities for lots of people.

4) Even if it was cheap, then the network is cheaply attacked.

turvarya

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 500

Quote from: bryant.coleman on June 30, 2015, 03:06:03 AM

May be we should start using the nuclear energy. Here are the advantages:

1. The cheapest form of energy available, as of now.
2. No environmental effect such as deforestation and pollution (if the waste is disposed off properly)
3. Generates employment opportunities for lots of people.

That said, IMO, we should try to create ASIC chips, which are more energy efficient.

Are there seriously still people out there believing that bullshit about nuclear energy?

ad 1) Not true. It just seems cheap since it is subsidized
ad 2) You can not dispose of nuclear waste. You have to store it for thousands of years(not in the mood to look up the numbers) and take into account, what could happen in this time.
ad 3) You can say that about nearly everything. Bringing back slavery? Sure, it generates employment opportunities for lots of people.

unamis76

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1012

Miners are (and will be) getting more and more energy efficient, while maintaining or even increasing their hashes per second. We've been witnessing this throughout all ASIC generations, for SHA and for Scrypt.

The future also passes through having solar powered mines, or even hydro powered mines, as we've been seeing around the forum. There are also containers that carry ASIC's, and that can be transported to more ecological places.

I think the electricity waste isn't much of a problem in the long run. There are also activities that are more polluting (folks who write such articles probably use cars everyday, and make a boatload of trash generally Cheesy

), and the benefits of Bitcoin pollution outweigh their downsides.

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1072

Quote from: Argwai96 on June 29, 2015, 09:32:37 PM

I have always had this idea of a self substantiating bitcoin miner with pure solar and wind energy, it could be a pricey prototype to make but i'm sure a lot of people would love the idea.

they could use that big solar power plant in california, i forget about its name

decentralized energy would be a good thing, but how they can achieve that if not by simply let the miners use their energy? any other form of decentralized energy will not be really decentralized but centralized

also the very nature of those free energy system make it a bit centralized, because not every place in the world for those kind of free enrgy..

bryant.coleman

legendary

Activity: 3808

Merit: 1219

May be we should start using the nuclear energy. Here are the advantages:

1. The cheapest form of energy available, as of now.
2. No environmental effect such as deforestation and pollution (if the waste is disposed off properly)
3. Generates employment opportunities for lots of people.

That said, IMO, we should try to create ASIC chips, which are more energy efficient.

jeannemadrigal2

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

Yes I agree that the financial leaders of the community could make a difference. They need to make money on it, because usually better power is expensive to make and needs some subsidy. That is the biggest reason that we don't see the rich people doing it I think.

fravia

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 500

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Quote from: Kprawn on June 30, 2015, 02:22:56 AM

We focus too much on Renewable energy... why not focus on developing Asic technology that use less energy, like these people did.
http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2014/08/15/german-startup-says-its-new-chip-halves-bitcoin-mining-energy/

Combine that with renewable energy and you will have a WIN/WIN situation.

Spreading the load and using energy more effectively is the key to success. http://www.coindesk.com/bitfury-light-bulbs-mine-bitcoin/

Yes, definitely! But when the difficulty increases, the new chips will become obsolete again. Ppl still continue to develop new chips. Besides this, cheap energy is a key factor as well!

anderson00673

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Quote from: Kprawn on June 30, 2015, 02:22:56 AM

We focus too much on Renewable energy... why not focus on developing Asic technology that use less energy, like these people did.
http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2014/08/15/german-startup-says-its-new-chip-halves-bitcoin-mining-energy/

Combine that with renewable energy and you will have a WIN/WIN situation.

Spreading the load and using energy more effectively is the key to success. http://www.coindesk.com/bitfury-light-bulbs-mine-bitcoin/

The problem is that mining profits are tied to electricity costs. So if they come out with a mass produced unit that uses 50% less energy, it seems to me that people would just buy 2x of them and we would be back to square one.

The real problem is how we get our juice. Here in the usa we use quite a lot of coal, so almost anything would be a better alternative. I think the best solution is to have government run nuclear power plants. Private run plants will always cut corners, leading to problems if not a meltdown.

Kprawn

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1074

We focus too much on Renewable energy... why not focus on developing Asic technology that use less energy, like these people did.
http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2014/08/15/german-startup-says-its-new-chip-halves-bitcoin-mining-energy/

Combine that with renewable energy and you will have a WIN/WIN situation.

Spreading the load and using energy more effectively is the key to success. http://www.coindesk.com/bitfury-light-bulbs-mine-bitcoin/

tokeweed

legendary

Activity: 3976

Merit: 1421

Life, Love and Laughter...

Quote from: ajareselde on June 30, 2015, 12:36:19 AM

This issue was addressed many times before, i don't understand why it's being brought up again..

We could just as easily accuse governments for wasting energy in producing fiat and using ATM's and alike.. Just think of how many machines every government that has fiat is
using,and that's not just energy being wasted, it's also polluting environment and wasting material used for the bills themselves.
IMHO, it just looks like people are searching for an excuse to attack bitcoin once again, nothing more.

cheers

Exactly. We shouldn't be following them...

edit: We should be talking about it at least... again and again. You never know, somebody might pick it up and actually do something about it.

ajareselde

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1000

Satoshi is rolling in his grave. #bitcoin

This issue was addressed many times before, i don't understand why it's being brought up again..

We could just as easily accuse governments for wasting energy in producing fiat and using ATM's and alike.. Just think of how many machines every government that has fiat is
using,and that's not just energy being wasted, it's also polluting environment and wasting material used for the bills themselves.
IMHO, it just looks like people are searching for an excuse to attack bitcoin once again, nothing more.

cheers

Argwai96

legendary

Activity: 1036

Merit: 1000

Thug for life!

Quote from: tokeweed on June 29, 2015, 09:39:20 PM

Quote from: Argwai96 on June 29, 2015, 09:32:37 PM

I have always had this idea of a self substantiating bitcoin miner with pure solar and wind energy, it could be a pricey prototype to make but i'm sure a lot of people would love the idea.

Yup. That would be awesome. The excess energy generated could even be sold to nearby communities. I think decentralized energy might be the next big thing.

decentralized energy we should be selling energy back to the power companies not they to us, or even the idea of having a self sustainable home would be the next bom in the market just like 3d printing was for designers.

jonald_fyookball

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1008

Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political

Quote from: tokeweed on June 29, 2015, 10:13:26 PM

Quote from: hua_hui on June 29, 2015, 10:06:29 PM

Some companies are doing this.
like this one https://forum.cryptomining.farm/index.php?topic=2.0
https://nxtforum.org/assets-board/(ann)-(cell)-solarfarm-asset-photovoltaic-power-station-in-thailand-18mw/
They are building Photovoltaic power station Project to use generated electricity to mine bitcoin! Such kind of self sustainable mining farm is the future of bitcoin mining industry as the difficulty increases day by day, for the aim of gaining competitive advantage.

Now this is worth advertising. How's that project going? Links directly to their site would be helpful.

edit: Not only should the aim be competitive advantage. But also to at least not harm the environment. Bitcoin should be a group of forward thinking people, not becoming like the greedy, power hungry banksters and politicians that's taking place here right now.

I agree. The challenge is that proof of work by nature needs to cost money and energy.
and not to open up the whole PoW vs PoS debate, but it's unavoidable because a lot of people
think PoS can work and save energy. For better or worse, there are issues with PoS that haven't been successfully addressed yet.

tokeweed

legendary

Activity: 3976

Merit: 1421

Life, Love and Laughter...

Quote from: hua_hui on June 29, 2015, 10:06:29 PM

Some companies are doing this.
like this one https://forum.cryptomining.farm/index.php?topic=2.0
https://nxtforum.org/assets-board/(ann)-(cell)-solarfarm-asset-photovoltaic-power-station-in-thailand-18mw/
They are building Photovoltaic power station Project to use generated electricity to mine bitcoin! Such kind of self sustainable mining farm is the future of bitcoin mining industry as the difficulty increases day by day, for the aim of gaining competitive advantage.

Now this is worth advertising. How's that project going? Links directly to their site would be helpful.

edit: Not only should the aim be competitive advantage. But also to at least not harm the environment. Bitcoin should be a group of forward thinking people, not becoming like the greedy, power hungry banksters and politicians that's taking place here right now.

hua_hui

legendary

Activity: 1386

Merit: 1016

Some companies are doing this.
like this one https://forum.cryptomining.farm/index.php?topic=2.0
https://nxtforum.org/assets-board/(ann)-(cell)-solarfarm-asset-photovoltaic-power-station-in-thailand-18mw/
They are building Photovoltaic power station Project to use generated electricity to mine bitcoin! Such kind of self sustainable mining farm is the future of bitcoin mining industry as the difficulty increases day by day, for the aim of gaining competitive advantage.

Topic: Bitcoin Millionaires Should Start Looking into Renewable Energy (Read 1252 times)