Pages:
Author

Topic: Bitcoin mining at 20 cents per kwh - page 2. (Read 3421 times)

newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
July 23, 2011, 03:43:08 AM
#4
I salute you.

I never understood the folks who complained that power-consumption was the sole reason why they got out of mining.  Either their math was wrong or they weren't doing it right.

Or they are in places where per KW/h costs more. For example, mine's around US$0.27/KWh
legendary
Activity: 1692
Merit: 1018
July 23, 2011, 03:30:52 AM
#3
Assuming you're running at about 1.9 Mhps/Watt, that puts your average power-consumption at 1,750W (1.75kW) which is 1260kW per 30 days or $252 USD per month. 3.2 Ghps at current 1.69m difficulty @ $13.7 USD/btc is pretty close to $800/month.  That's how I'm guessing how you're close to $550/month.

An assumption about the 1.9Mhps/watt can only be made if running old hardware that's very difficult to obtain (5xxx series cards).

My set up: AMD 145 CPU, mATX mobo, 2Gb RAM, 30Gb SSD, 6950 (cannot unlock shaders any more).  330Mhash/s, slightly overclocked, RAM downclocked to half, fans at 25%, 80Plus PSU.  Using an accurate power meter it consumes 205 to 210 watts, depending on fan activity.  That's 4.75kWh per day, or 142.5kWh per 30 day month.  It produces around 0.2 BTC per day, and since I pay the equivalent of US 25c per kWh it costs me $1.19 to get $2.72 of income.  $1.53 per day.  Then take out income tax, which few people add to the calculations as they think they'll never get caught when miscellaneous USD$ appears in their accounts, and it's close to a dollar per day.  $30 per month on hardware that today costs about $350.  It's difficult to get excited.

If I could unlock the shaders or overclock further the calculation would be slightly more favourable, but power consumption goes up with hashing speed too.  Adding a second card to the PC is not that efficient as you gain by not doubling up on power consumption by the RAM/mobo/PSU, but you pay the penalty of the CPU now running at 100% due to dodgy OpenCL drivers.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
July 23, 2011, 01:36:33 AM
#2
I salute you.

I never understood the folks who complained that power-consumption was the sole reason why they got out of mining.  Either their math was wrong or they weren't doing it right.

Assuming you're running at about 1.9 Mhps/Watt, that puts your average power-consumption at 1,750W (1.75kW) which is 1260kW per 30 days or $252 USD per month. 3.2 Ghps at current 1.69m difficulty @ $13.7 USD/btc is pretty close to $800/month.  That's how I'm guessing how you're close to $550/month.

Difference if your $/kWh was half of $0.20/kWh to $0.10/kWh...  Only a difference of $126 USD more in profit or $4.20 USD/day.

Difficulty would have to hit around 5m, if the exchange rate stayed flat, where you'd only break even.

Cheers,
Kermee

P.S. All calculations do not include power-costs that may be required in order to cool rigs, or may be negligible, or may be a fixed existing cost whether or not you're having to deal with heat generation of mining rigs.

full member
Activity: 125
Merit: 100
July 22, 2011, 10:07:22 PM
#1
with 3.2 gigs

still profitable by approx $550/month at current bitcoin prices..................

and that's at .20/kwh

Yup, CA likes it anal style..............

DKN
Pages:
Jump to: