Cost of electricity is your own option and risk to join a challenge and win BTC 25.
Cost of electricity is not an "option" or "risk", it's an overhead expense of running a business. Mining is a business, not a "challenge", and you don't "win" anything, you get paid for providing a service. As a business operator, you don't have to provide your service to people who refuse to pay, or are consuming more of your resources than they're paying for. That's just common sense.
It looks like powerful VIPs took control over Bitcoin network deciding what transactions are ok and what should be delated, implementing double spending in microtransactions.
WTF are you talking about?
Block creation should be time clocked process to have the same block created every 1-10 min
and distributed to every interested party not to let dirty games to be played to closing doors to
Bitcoin micropayments to poor people from Africa and other developing countries and regions.
What dirty games are you talking about?
What is Bitcoin dust for the VIPs from Japan, US, Europe is still a real money paid for
the poor villagers from Africa, Asia and developing countries.
No it isn't. The dust limit of
BTC0.0000543 is about 5 cents. The transaction fee to send that is
BTC0.0001, or about 10 cents. I guarantee that there are no poor villagers trying to pay amounts lower than 5 cents over the Internet, and getting upset that they have to pay 10 cents to do so.
Price of 1 Bitcoin can grow to $ 1,000,000 one day requesting people to stop < $ 100 payments via Bitcoin network since $100 payment may be called Bitcoin dust next year .
Transaction fees and the dust limit have already been reduced multiple times as a result of rising exchange rates. What makes you think this won't continue in the future?
So micro , nano Bitcoin payments should be rolled into account balance sum assigned to one signature
every year via zero-award fee-free self-payments exactly as I can do at any real bank today.
Explain how. You do realise that "real banks" charge fees for this service, right?
If UN and others awarded Nobel Prize for the inventor of microcredits
so let me win another Nobel Prize for micropayments solution and technology within Bitcoin network.
Your chance of winning a Nobel Prize would be slightly greater if you actually, you know, invented and implemented your solution. There's no Noble Prize for saying "wouldn't it be nice if..."
I fully support Bitcoin micropayments since I work closely with UN Foundation, other UN agencies,
developing renewable energy solutions for Africa and other poor, underdeveloped regions of the globe.
No you don't. If you truly supported Bitcoin micropayments, you would be running a mining pool which allows microtransactions. As I explained in my first post, that's all you need to do to make it happen.
My intention is to implement Bitcoin micropayments into UN agencies world-wide.
What's stopping you?