Veering back on topic... do you know any Notorious Relic Dealers named Chen? I believe that is critical to the successful implementation of options trading in bitcoin.
Seems intereyest has been gouged.
Topic: Bitcoin Options Contracts - Gauging Interest (Read 3105 times)
Seems intereyest has been gouged.
Veering back on topic... do you know any Notorious Relic Dealers named Chen? I believe that is critical to the successful implementation of options trading in bitcoin.
No, I saw other disgusting things on their site, and stopped digging. Its obviously un moderated and just like a site such as 4chan people post cp, all I asked was that she defend herself by saying, something like "I dont agree with allowing these things to be published, but I do find them disgusting."
If you want your "reputable" exchange to advance, I would suggest disregarding the image board.
If you want your "reputable" exchange to advance, I would suggest disregarding the image board.
You could start by either learning English, logic, or both. Or at the very least stop confusing what people actually said with what you think they said.
You could respond to a request to comment with one that addresses the subject we are discussing.
Must every thread derail to this over beaten long decayed horse?
Good point back on subject, cryptostocks please please please continue to make your site awesome. We love it. Burnside appears to have a decent site, but little volume, maybe it can be opened up to btc too?
No, I saw other disgusting things on their site, and stopped digging. Its obviously un moderated and just like a site such as 4chan people post cp, all I asked was that she defend herself by saying, something like "I dont agree with allowing these things to be published, but I do find them disgusting."
If you want your "reputable" exchange to advance, I would suggest disregarding the image board.
If you want your "reputable" exchange to advance, I would suggest disregarding the image board.
You could start by either learning English, logic, or both. Or at the very least stop confusing what people actually said with what you think they said.
You could respond to a request to comment with one that addresses the subject we are discussing.
Must every thread derail to this over beaten long decayed horse?
No, I saw other disgusting things on their site, and stopped digging. Its obviously un moderated and just like a site such as 4chan people post cp, all I asked was that she defend herself by saying, something like "I dont agree with allowing these things to be published, but I do find them disgusting."
If you want your "reputable" exchange to advance, I would suggest disregarding the image board.
If you want your "reputable" exchange to advance, I would suggest disregarding the image board.
You could start by either learning English, logic, or both. Or at the very least stop confusing what people actually said with what you think they said.
You could respond to a request to comment with one that addresses the subject we are discussing.
No, I saw other disgusting things on their site, and stopped digging. Its obviously un moderated and just like a site such as 4chan people post cp, all I asked was that she defend herself by saying, something like "I dont agree with allowing these things to be published, but I do find them disgusting."
If you want your "reputable" exchange to advance, I would suggest disregarding the image board.
If you want your "reputable" exchange to advance, I would suggest disregarding the image board.
You could start by either learning English, logic, or both. Or at the very least stop confusing what people actually said with what you think they said.
No, I saw other disgusting things on their site, and stopped digging. Its obviously un moderated and just like a site such as 4chan people post cp, all I asked was that she defend herself by saying, something like "I dont agree with allowing these things to be published, but I do find them disgusting."
If you want your "reputable" exchange to advance, I would suggest disregarding the image board.
If you want your "reputable" exchange to advance, I would suggest disregarding the image board.
I like cryptostocks I have a ton of shares on there, all you are missing is more activity here to help drum up more volume.
Quoted for the humor content.
Quoted to show I am not on ignore and that she simply is unwilling to answer accusations that her company also allows the hosting of child pornography on their server.
Did you view this alleged CP?
I like cryptostocks I have a ton of shares on there, all you are missing is more activity here to help drum up more volume.
Quoted for the humor content.
Quoted to show I am not on ignore and that she simply is unwilling to answer accusations that her company also allows the hosting of child pornography on their server.
I like cryptostocks I have a ton of shares on there, all you are missing is more activity here to help drum up more volume.
Quoted for the humor content.
I like cryptostocks I have a ton of shares on there, all you are missing is more activity here to help drum up more volume. But I think its progressing nicely. And your site is not a mess like mpex and a lagfest like glbse. Only thing I can think of is to have each security give the option to add more than one currency they accept per share so they can receive btc ltc dvc if they choose to at whatever price they have set.
It will go the same way glbse did eventually. Its better if we come up with a way for each security issuer to run their own company separately from any exchange.
The offline shares would essentially do that, cryptostocks, can you create a gui that can be downloaded and installed to manage your "offline" securities similar to the bitcoin wallet?
I like cryptostocks I have a ton of shares on there, all you are missing is more activity here to help drum up more volume. But I think its progressing nicely. And your site is not a mess like mpex and a lagfest like glbse. Only thing I can think of is to have each security give the option to add more than one currency they accept per share so they can receive btc ltc dvc if they choose to at whatever price they have set.
It will go the same way glbse did eventually. Its better if we come up with a way for each security issuer to run their own company separately from any exchange.
What do you offer for a delisting process should I later choose to move my asset to another exchange?
There are many choices:
1. We provide the feature of offline shares, in short: you get a hash that uniquely identifies a number of shares for a ticker that you own. Should another exchange be willing to work with these hash codes, we will provide an API that would allow a seamless online movement of shares from exchange to exchange
2. If you as a "security" issuer have any other requirement, we will be more than willing to work with you on any transfer mechanism that you/the other exchange would require.
Got any idea? Let us know, we'll work with you on implementing it.
I want to let you know I have nothing against you or anything, I am just am hesitant after GLSBE. I am registered at your site and I do like the way it works I just checked it out again. Do you have a service post on here?
Yeah and even if you don't want to mix in vircurex or whatever the issuer can set their own prices.
I like cryptostocks I have a ton of shares on there, all you are missing is more activity here to help drum up more volume. But I think its progressing nicely. And your site is not a mess like mpex and a lagfest like glbse. Only thing I can think of is to have each security give the option to add more than one currency they accept per share so they can receive btc ltc dvc if they choose to at whatever price they have set.
What do you offer for a delisting process should I later choose to move my asset to another exchange?
There are many choices:
1. We provide the feature of offline shares, in short: you get a hash that uniquely identifies a number of shares for a ticker that you own. Should another exchange be willing to work with these hash codes, we will provide an API that would allow a seamless online movement of shares from exchange to exchange
2. If you as a "security" issuer have any other requirement, we will be more than willing to work with you on any transfer mechanism that you/the other exchange would require.
Got any idea? Let us know, we'll work with you on implementing it.
Honestly I would just stay away from all exchanges at this point in time. Do it old fashion pen paper way.
Whats missing to be "there"?
Cryptostocks.com is offering all you need:
- Listing projects
- Ability to pay back your investores via dividends
- Offline shares
- Two factor authentication
- Trade In (coming up within the next two or three days)
- Multiple chain supported: BTC, LTC, DVC
- Bonds / Buy backs
- API
- etc.
Cryptostocks.com is offering all you need:
- Listing projects
- Ability to pay back your investores via dividends
- Offline shares
- Two factor authentication
- Trade In (coming up within the next two or three days)
- Multiple chain supported: BTC, LTC, DVC
- Bonds / Buy backs
- API
- etc.
For example, I would offer $13 strike Call for Nov 23rd expiration for 1.95
You mean 1.95 BTC? This looks to me as the same thing as O.BTCUSD.C130N on MPOE/MPEx that sells only at 0.25757542 atm. And MPOE consistently reports profit so their market making seems sound.And the price on MPOE is nearly $3usd while I'm offering it for 1.95
The MPOE sites include un-moderated image board which have a tendency to include CP (child porn) and various other pretty nasty stuff. The community is still waiting for burnside or someone to launch a viable alternative to glbse and crytpostocks looks to be getting there.
For example, I would offer $13 strike Call for Nov 23rd expiration for 1.95
You mean 1.95 BTC? This looks to me as the same thing as O.BTCUSD.C130N on MPOE/MPEx that sells only at 0.25757542 atm. And MPOE consistently reports profit so their market making seems sound.And the price on MPOE is nearly $3usd while I'm offering it for 1.95
Jump to: