Gold has stability value, bitcoin its more volatile. Bitcoin needs more stability if it wants to become as popular as gold.
I think you need to rethink your data and opinion about the price of gold and the price and volatility of bitcoin in time. Below are the charts of price of bitcoin this year (which as you can see is almost stable) and the price of gold the last 5 years (which is decreased the last four years and half). It is not the first time that I give these charts but I see again and again people not informed. So needed to publish those again.
Bitcoin:
Gold:
Now show the bitcoin all time high price compared to todays price for comparison like you did for gold -
Very good. These data are very known by everyone which follow bitcoin. No one can deny that bitcoin is volatile.
But with my charts and with my words i wanted to tell that this year bitcoin was almost stable (new thing for it) while the price of gold (not only for the last year but for about four year and half) is decreasing. Those are the LAST data for both the subjects. And are the ANSWER of the post quoted by me. The author of post has very different (wrong) knowledge abut those (LAST) data. My intention was to show (with data) that he has erroneous knowledges. So my answer have as principal aim to give the ANSWER to the quoted post.
Then, as for the volatility (which is shown during the years 2013-2015) and the tendency of decrease of price during these years of bitcoin these are very known things for everyone which follow bitcoin. Maybe these data had in mind even the author the post quoted by me. But let make a little interpretation.
We have in one hand the price of gold which decreased in the last 4 years and half (so no change of tendency during all this period) and on the other hand the price of bitcoin which is volatile with tendency decreasing (we all know the reason of the decrease - MtGox has pumping artificially the price during its activity) during 2013-2015 and as
a new thing the almost stability of this price during all the 2015. Which is the thing which must be underlined according to you? Maybe all this, can told you. I thought not because the first period of bitcoin is well known and don't offer nothing new. Even for the poster. With to much probability it was this period which made possible his thoughts about the volatility of bitcoin.
While the almost stability of the bitcoin price it could (must) be new for him. This is needed to give. And that I gave.