Pages:
Author

Topic: Bitcoin really is in trouble. - page 2. (Read 9040 times)

legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1022
November 06, 2013, 11:13:31 AM
#66
I agree it is a sham. Bitcoin is not currency it is a speculative bubble.

Bitcoin is a sham. Unlike the dollar.

Quote of the day, awesome
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
November 06, 2013, 05:57:50 AM
#65
I agree it is a sham. Bitcoin is not currency it is a speculative bubble.

Bitcoin is a sham. Unlike the dollar.
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
RUM AND CARROTS: A PIRATE LIFE FOR ME
November 06, 2013, 03:47:02 AM
#64
Typically, Bitcoin cultists have dismissed the latest which demonstrates that Bitcoin has a fundamental vulnerability. Some salient facts pertinent to this issue largely ignored by this community of rampant speculators.

1. Despite what Bitcoin cultists claim, Bitcoin does have a central authority. Specifically, the group responsible for the most popular Bitcoin client wields as much power over Bitcoin as any central bank does over state fiat.

No, that's flat out wrong. Not only is the group that works on the standard client very large, and very broad, and very active (not to mention under lots of scrutiny) the miners also have a strong say in what bitcoin looks like. Even if the group that makes the popular client were tyrannical in some sense, the miners (the REAL backbone of Bitcoin) can decide themselves if they support new features, new clients, etc... If the miners and developers somehow 'collude' on features, then what you get is a BETTER BITCOIN. Because what your saying is that the people who actively build bitcoin agree with the people who actively run bitcoin, which is exactly what all this is anyway. It's a consensus system. Which means it runs perfectly fine.

Quote
2. A fork of the most popular client with what we shall call a war miner module (extra credit for spotting the gaming reference) would quickly become popular with all those people who invested in ASIC hardware, but ended up  out of pocket as mining difficulty moved ahead of them.

Nope. There are tens of thousands, if not now, soon, hundreds of thousands of miners out there. The only thing that coordinates them now is the pools that they mine one. Miners have no interest in a fork, it's bad for bitcoin, bad for business. A Forked bitcoin with the 'loser asic miners' has no value. You might as well jump on my bandwagon to Monetize and Mine Bitcoin Testnet. Because there already IS a 'bitcoin2' and it's right inside the standard bitcoin client. If you're pissed the difficulty has surpassed your device and still want to mine bitcoin, just hop on the test net. Forks run by the already out-hashes ASICS would be instantly orphaned.

Quote
3. There seems to be a foolish assumption that nobody would bother exploiting this systemic flaw in Bitcoin because to do so would destroy the very thing they would be investing in exploiting. Alas gentlemen, you shall be hoist be your own petard. For all the talk of a brave new world of cryptocurrency, free from the ruinous short-termism of state fiat, what you have is a community whose engagement with Bitcoin is entirely speculative in nature. It's all about riding the bubble and cashing out before it explodes, very few people seem truly committed to Bitcoin as a currency, rather a means to acquire more of the sate fiat they claim to detest. You've collectively recreated the very worst excesses of the Wall St. Mafia, and as a consequence there are plenty in the Bitcoin community who will seek to exploit this core vulnerability for profit.

It's not a flaw, and it's not currently exploitable. You are probably not watching the development email list, but not only are they talking about ways to get around this, but the issue is academic at best. The mining ecosystem is rather well understood to the miners There aren't a bunch of "dark horses" out there. The same people with the hash power to pull something like this off are also the same people working to find solutions to it. There's no money to be made in destroying your own money.

Eri
sr. member
Activity: 264
Merit: 250
November 06, 2013, 03:10:12 AM
#63

They can blacklist Bitcoins, reverse transactions and penalise people choosing to use a client other than their own. Sound like a central authority to me.

Your really under the wrong impression on how it all works.

lets say the govt tells the devs to make a client that blacklists coins, they publish it and say "this is the official client you must use it".

1. Nobody is required to use it, and anyone with half a brain wont.
2. Everyone will be yelling about how crazy it is and to not use it.
3. Someone will be forking the official client(probably the devs themselves over TOR) to include the latest updates without that bit of code in it.


That example applies to the other two examples you mention. And let me just cut you off before you try to make your next point. "But the devs DID reverse many transactions!" No they didnt. If memory serves... there was an issue where the blockchain forked from an update, unintentionally.  you either let it run its course and fix itself (screwing people in the process) or ... get the pool operators together to go back to the previous version of the client to fix it faster. The fallout was minimal and it was the right choice to make. The problem that caused it was in the original database the clients used, a bug.

If people wernt in agreement with what was done they would have left the pools rather then migrating to them.

If you want the rest of the details im sure there is a thread about it somewhere, including a chat log.
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1001
Energy is Wealth
November 06, 2013, 01:51:46 AM
#62
Much bigger trouble on the horizon, affects not just bitcoin:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/internet-to-fracture-along-national-borders-325642
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1005
November 06, 2013, 12:34:23 AM
#61

Quote
fundamental flaw? 


The fundamental flaw with bitcoin is that it is not a UNIT.  Currency is 3 things. 1. a store of value
                                                                                                           2. a medium of exchange
                                                                                                           3. a UNIT of account

Bitcoin is not currency because it is not a UNIT. Units are definable in objective terms and are a constant
Bitcoin is not definable and is not a constant. Bitcoin has the same problem as the dollar since 1971. It cant be defined.

This is crackpot gibberish you basically just pulled out of your ass.

Umm, yeah.  Right.  Bitcoin isn't currency because, according to you, it "has the same problem as the dollar," since apparently the dollar isn't currency either according to your utterly idiotic made-up bullshit.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
November 05, 2013, 11:16:19 PM
#60
i think btc be price 300$

 Huh

you tallk about some small panic
about project bitcoin is die

you need call doctor

all people try/make big money

also a lot people invest a lot money for this procedure


 Roll Eyes
sr. member
Activity: 333
Merit: 250
Commander of the Hodl Legions
November 05, 2013, 11:11:49 PM
#59

Currency is 3 things. 1. a store of value
                               2. a medium of exchange
                               3. a UNIT of account

Bitcoin is not currency because it is not a UNIT. Units are definable in objective terms and are a constant
Bitcoin is not definable and is not a constant. Bitcoin has the same problem as the dollar since 1971. It cant be defined.


Mail is 3 things: 1. a mail box
                        2. an envelope
                        3. a mailman

SMTP is not mail cos you can't put the bits indide an envelope, and there's no mailman... So it doesnt fit the definition of mail despite the fact it has the same functionality.. Theres even people who call it "email"! What a bunch of fools!

Everybody knows that the definition of money is an static and immutable god-given concept. It cant evolve along the years! Whats this kind of sorcery? Let's call the spanish inquisition! I'm sending my carrier piggeon now...
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
November 05, 2013, 09:43:39 PM
#58

Quote
fundamental flaw?  


The fundamental flaw with bitcoin is that it is not a UNIT.  Currency is 3 things. 1. a store of value
                                                                                                           2. a medium of exchange
                                                                                                           3. a UNIT of account

Bitcoin is not currency because it is not a UNIT. Units are definable in objective terms and are a constant
Bitcoin is not definable and is not a constant. Bitcoin has the same problem as the dollar since 1971. It cant be defined.

For bitcoin to become currency it has to be defined and the limit has to be removed. The amount of bitcoin would then have to change in relation to demand for it to keep the definition true.  


Yeah.....see, your myopic focus on this unit pedantry doesn't make sense in your other threads either.

What about bitcoin lacks units? Just because the unit is defined at the protocol layer in binary...is that what's annoying you here? The inherent abstractness of digital assets? You're kinda sounding like an old-school gold bug who can't get his head around something non-physically-tangible...


Edit: Ugh...I can't believe I bumped this thread! Says to self: "Don't feed the trolls....don't feed the trolls..."


What is that definition? What is objectively equal too? It is not that it is not tangible. We have units of electricity and they are not tangible. The problem is it is not definable.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1004
November 05, 2013, 09:35:11 PM
#57

Quote
fundamental flaw?  


The fundamental flaw with bitcoin is that it is not a UNIT.  Currency is 3 things. 1. a store of value
                                                                                                           2. a medium of exchange
                                                                                                           3. a UNIT of account

Bitcoin is not currency because it is not a UNIT. Units are definable in objective terms and are a constant
Bitcoin is not definable and is not a constant. Bitcoin has the same problem as the dollar since 1971. It cant be defined.

For bitcoin to become currency it has to be defined and the limit has to be removed. The amount of bitcoin would then have to change in relation to demand for it to keep the definition true.  


Yeah.....see, your myopic focus on this unit pedantry doesn't make sense in your other threads either.

What about bitcoin lacks units? Just because the unit is defined at the protocol layer in binary...is that what's annoying you here? The inherent abstractness of digital assets? You're kinda sounding like an old-school gold bug who can't get his head around something non-physically-tangible...


Edit: Ugh...I can't believe I bumped this thread! Says to self: "Don't feed the trolls....don't feed the trolls..."
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
November 05, 2013, 09:22:51 PM
#56

Quote
fundamental flaw? 


The fundamental flaw with bitcoin is that it is not a UNIT.  Currency is 3 things. 1. a store of value
                                                                                                           2. a medium of exchange
                                                                                                           3. a UNIT of account

Bitcoin is not currency because it is not a UNIT. Units are definable in objective terms and are a constant
Bitcoin is not definable and is not a constant. Bitcoin has the same problem as the dollar since 1971. It cant be defined.

For bitcoin to become currency it has to be defined and the limit has to be removed. The amount of bitcoin would then have to change in relation to demand for it to keep the definition true.   
newbie
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
November 05, 2013, 07:31:45 PM
#55
Typically, Bitcoin cultists have dismissed the latest which demonstrates that Bitcoin has a fundamental vulnerability. Some salient facts pertinent to this issue largely ignored by this community of rampant speculators.


1. Despite what Bitcoin cultists claim, Bitcoin does have a central authority. Specifically, the group responsible for the most popular Bitcoin client wields as much power over Bitcoin as any central bank does over state fiat.

2. A fork of the most popular client with what we shall call a war miner module (extra credit for spotting the gaming reference) would quickly become popular with all those people who invested in ASIC hardware, but ended up  out of pocket as mining difficulty moved ahead of them.

3. There seems to be a foolish assumption that nobody would bother exploiting this systemic flaw in Bitcoin because to do so would destroy the very thing they would be investing in exploiting. Alas gentlemen, you shall be hoist be your own petard. For all the talk of a brave new world of cryptocurrency, free from the ruinous short-termism of state fiat, what you have is a community whose engagement with Bitcoin is entirely speculative in nature. It's all about riding the bubble and cashing out before it explodes, very few people seem truly committed to Bitcoin as a currency, rather a means to acquire more of the sate fiat they claim to detest. You've collectively recreated the very worst excesses of the Wall St. Mafia, and as a consequence there are plenty in the Bitcoin community who will seek to exploit this core vulnerability for profit.

The greed that created the bubble in Bitcoin will burn it to the ground just as quickly.
Oh Revans. You may have just outsmarted yourself. Now that you've rid yourself of all bitcoin and have no business here except your own, what is your next chapter in life?
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
Fourth richest fictional character
November 05, 2013, 07:30:53 PM
#54
Too late guys, I already sold all my Bitcoins. Cheesy

Glad I got out at the top Smiley *phew!*
full member
Activity: 180
Merit: 100
November 05, 2013, 07:02:05 PM
#53
Hey all,
Just here for the worship service/ goat slaying.

Where do I get my uniform?

And where's the kool-aid???

PS   I <3 this cult!

PPS   Lets nominate Revans to high priestess.    He's obviously the smartest here AND he has a crystal ball!!!!!!!!!!!!!   (extra credit for gaming reference)

Trolololololo

legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1001
bitcoin - the aerogel of money
November 05, 2013, 05:54:01 PM
#52
originality: 2/10
style: 3/10
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
November 05, 2013, 04:56:55 PM
#51
is it already going back up?
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
November 05, 2013, 04:56:35 PM
#50
Somewhere out there, a garden is missing its troll.


Gnomes, gardens have gnomes.

True, but I was picturing something far less cute, more like "chucky" clutching a dollar bill.


Whatever floats your boat.
sr. member
Activity: 358
Merit: 250
November 05, 2013, 04:43:56 PM
#49
Somewhere out there, a garden is missing its troll.


Gnomes, gardens have gnomes.

True, but I was picturing something far less cute, more like "chucky" clutching a dollar bill.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
November 05, 2013, 04:37:37 PM
#48
Somewhere out there, a garden is missing its troll.


Gnomes, gardens have gnomes.
sr. member
Activity: 358
Merit: 250
November 05, 2013, 04:35:36 PM
#47
Somewhere out there, a garden is missing its troll.
Pages:
Jump to: