I hope you know that investment risk can only be managed and reduced, but it can't be completely eradicated no matter which form of investment it is, so the same thing is applicable to Bitcoin. No matter how long it stays, it will only gain more popularity and approval from those criticizing it, and some Bitcoin racists will turn their backs on it and become Bitcoiners, but that will not change its volatile nature, which puts your investment at high risk, especially when you buy at a higher price.
once invested, there is always risk, whether it is gold or real estate, two types of assets are considered the safest ever due to their popularity. but if you compare bitcoin with these asset classes, it is clear that bitcoin is much riskier because it is not yet widely available and has not been recognized by the majority of the world. Those who participate and accept bitcoin represent only 2% of the world population, showing that bitcoin is actually much more risky.
Do you calculate bitcoin risk by recognition, or do you calculate bitcoin risk by both recognition and volatility?
There is every tendency that any investment with a high possibility of a higher reward always has a greater risk when you view it from the financial studies and adviser point of view.
Talking about real estate and gold, I think the era for real estate and gold is gradually fading away; the price and value of those investments are not actually turning into anything tangible these days.