Pages:
Author

Topic: Bitcoin Savings and Trust | Home | Closed - page 59. (Read 802117 times)

hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 504
^SEM img of Si wafer edge, scanned 2012-3-12.
January 03, 2012, 06:45:17 PM
Amazing, I'm still in! Apparently I'm not a "new lender" anymore.
I do understand the reasons for doing it the way you do, but for me it does feel fairer to just bump out the latest deposits, not the latest accounts. In the end it's your decision though.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
"Yes I am a pirate, 200 years too late."
January 03, 2012, 06:39:27 PM

The result of a little scheme where I gathered the first 51% of the lenders and got em all to vote for the status quo. Grin

I wish i could limit votes to members of btclending.

Why not put the poll behind the login on btclending.com, and limit it to one vote per account?

I just thought to eliminate the risk of people thinking I was swaying the vote I'd just do it on the forums.  In all honesty when I did the poll I got a lot of comments from my lenders asking why I would change things.  Enough that I think if we did another vote we would end up with the same outcome or more.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
January 03, 2012, 06:34:33 PM

The result of a little scheme where I gathered the first 51% of the lenders and got em all to vote for the status quo. Grin

I wish i could limit votes to members of btclending.

Why not put the poll behind the login on btclending.com, and limit it to one vote per account?
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
January 03, 2012, 06:21:52 PM
My misunderstanding then.  I was under the impression that once coins were in, they were in, and it was only in the later rounds of funding that the election would take place.

No, at anytime if a lender is in a higher place (by account age) they you can force lenders out.

No problem.  Smiley

Back at day job, but at least I'm still enjoying summer.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
"Yes I am a pirate, 200 years too late."
January 03, 2012, 06:19:02 PM
My misunderstanding then.  I was under the impression that once coins were in, they were in, and it was only in the later rounds of funding that the election would take place.

No, at anytime if a lender is in a higher place (by account age) they you can force lenders out.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
January 03, 2012, 06:16:40 PM
My misunderstanding then.  I was under the impression that once coins were in, they were in, and it was only in the later rounds of funding that the election would take place.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
"Yes I am a pirate, 200 years too late."
January 03, 2012, 06:11:54 PM

The result of a little scheme where I gathered the first 51% of the lenders and got em all to vote for the status quo. Grin

I wish i could limit votes to members of btclending.
Can't you collect votes via PM from investors? I don't appreciate this little side-business "ineededausername" is running, and I'm fairly certain I'm not the only one.

The goal at the start was to only have a few investors, which is why I did it this way.  I rarely have to force people out but I'm not going to cut into my profits.  I also need to give courtesy to those that trusted me from the start.  I'm managing more coins than most of the lending sub-forum combined and getting to that point took a lot of trust from my early adopters.  If this is not how you planned on making your money you don't have to stick around. 
donator
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
January 03, 2012, 06:04:31 PM

The result of a little scheme where I gathered the first 51% of the lenders and got em all to vote for the status quo. Grin

I wish i could limit votes to members of btclending.
Can't you collect votes via PM from investors? I don't appreciate this little side-business "ineededausername" is running, and I'm fairly certain I'm not the only one.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
"Yes I am a pirate, 200 years too late."
January 03, 2012, 05:51:57 PM

The result of a little scheme where I gathered the first 51% of the lenders and got em all to vote for the status quo. Grin

I wish i could limit votes to members of btclending.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
bitcoin hundred-aire
January 03, 2012, 05:50:38 PM
What has happened, exactly?

One of my early lenders just pushed out some new people.
You mean they deposited after you have updated the OP to 0BTC?

Yea, forcing out new people like a freight train going through a parking lot.
In that case, what if early adopters keep deposit more BTC even when you have 0BTC storage left?
Would that mean more late adopters getting kicked out???

Yep, I put the poll vote and they won. Sad

The result of a little scheme where I gathered the first 51% of the lenders and got em all to vote for the status quo. Grin
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
"Yes I am a pirate, 200 years too late."
January 03, 2012, 05:48:40 PM
What has happened, exactly?

One of my early lenders just pushed out some new people.
You mean they deposited after you have updated the OP to 0BTC?

Yea, forcing out new people like a freight train going through a parking lot.
In that case, what if early adopters keep deposit more BTC even when you have 0BTC storage left?
Would that mean more late adopters getting kicked out???

Yep, I put the poll vote and they won. Sad
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
January 03, 2012, 05:48:30 PM
What has happened, exactly?

One of my early lenders just pushed out some new people.
You mean they deposited after you have updated the OP to 0BTC?

Yea, forcing out new people like a freight train going through a parking lot.
In that case, what if early adopters keep deposit more BTC even when you have 0BTC storage left?
Would that mean more late adopters getting kicked out???

That's how it works. I don't think it's fair either.
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1005
January 03, 2012, 05:47:41 PM
What has happened, exactly?

One of my early lenders just pushed out some new people.
You mean they deposited after you have updated the OP to 0BTC?

Yea, forcing out new people like a freight train going through a parking lot.
In that case, what if early adopters keep deposit more BTC even when you have 0BTC storage left?
Would that mean more late adopters getting kicked out???
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
"Yes I am a pirate, 200 years too late."
January 03, 2012, 05:43:26 PM
What has happened, exactly?

One of my early lenders just pushed out some new people.
You mean they deposited after you have updated the OP to 0BTC?

Yea, forcing out new people like a freight train going through a parking lot.
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1005
January 03, 2012, 05:42:16 PM
What has happened, exactly?

One of my early lenders just pushed out some new people.
You mean they deposited after you have updated the OP to 0BTC?
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
"Yes I am a pirate, 200 years too late."
January 03, 2012, 05:35:55 PM
What has happened, exactly?

One of my early lenders just pushed out some new people.
donator
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
January 03, 2012, 05:35:04 PM
What has happened, exactly?
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
"Yes I am a pirate, 200 years too late."
January 03, 2012, 05:31:51 PM
/enable force withdraw

Wow, how many people did you eject just then Shocked

Enough for me to be hated for a couple days. Sad
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
January 03, 2012, 05:31:40 PM
/enable force withdraw

Wow, how many people did you eject just then Shocked

I bet just Dave.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
bitcoin hundred-aire
January 03, 2012, 05:30:50 PM
/enable force withdraw

Wow, how many people did you eject just then Shocked
Pages:
Jump to: