Topic: bitcoin scaling war explained in simple terms - page 2. (Read 1480 times)
I hope that my bitcoins will be safe when that happent and that bitcoin will not be destroyed.Also I hope that I will be able to buy bitcoin for less than 100 usd to become a rich and sell it for 3000$.
The scaling war is miners attempt to seize control of the developer side of things.
Bitcoin unlimited/segwit are puppet groups for miners.
Best move is to support core and keep things decentralized, rather than support bu/segwit and give miners all the power in a centralized format.
Bitcoin unlimited/segwit are puppet groups for miners.
Best move is to support core and keep things decentralized, rather than support bu/segwit and give miners all the power in a centralized format.
Be aware of the fact that everyone involved in the hardfork is a direct enemy of bitcoin.
hard forks are not dangerous or enemies of bitcoin. as long as the hard fork actually uses the full symbiotic consensus to enable a hard fork.
segwit whether bip9 or any other bip has avoided a proper consensus.. yep even sgwit2x is avoiding true consensus.
softforks can cause a bilateral split just as much as a hard for can.
soft bypasses certain symbiotic vote/veto where as hard utilities full symbiotic relationship vote/veto.
the issues of splitting or not splitting is not soft or hard.. its simply consensus vs controversial. and whether the controverts either giving and join majority or go on a ban-hammer session of dis-communicating opposing nodes to keep their minority alive(can happen soft or hard)
its worth people actually running scenario's instead of script reading from reddit
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 278
Bitcoin :open immutable decentralized global fair
LJR actually wants SW because LJR makes money through merge mining and wants all the exploits available to get sidechains running to merge mine many coins and get lots of funds that most pool customers dont realise are possible to get from mining
Gmax wants SW+LN without a base block increase. because he wants the onchain fee to grow to allow all the BScartell LN hubs to charge more per LN 'payment' so that barry can recoup money from all the investments of his portfolio including blockstram and bloq.
EG if onchain was 10c LNwould have to charge 0.01cent.. but if onchain was $2 LN could charge 1cent and people would be somewhat "happy"
the gavin vs blockstream is just social drama of distraction trying to assume gavin became corporatised while cor secretly(back then) was the actual group becoming corporatised..
(standard point in opposite direction distraction technique)
Gmax wants SW+LN without a base block increase. because he wants the onchain fee to grow to allow all the BScartell LN hubs to charge more per LN 'payment' so that barry can recoup money from all the investments of his portfolio including blockstram and bloq.
EG if onchain was 10c LNwould have to charge 0.01cent.. but if onchain was $2 LN could charge 1cent and people would be somewhat "happy"
the gavin vs blockstream is just social drama of distraction trying to assume gavin became corporatised while cor secretly(back then) was the actual group becoming corporatised..
(standard point in opposite direction distraction technique)
Exactly.
Also thank you for pointing out the distraction technique: I think its important for readers to engage their critical thinking especially on these forums with popular topics.
Thanks for the link. Everyone with half a brain should recognize that the unwillingness to increase the blocksize is driven by ulterior motives and greed. A second layer is unnecessary and opposite to Satoshi's stated goal of decentralization.
eule: Quite the contrary.
To all. I'd be comfortable to go as far as saying:
Be aware of the fact that everyone involved in the hardfork is a direct enemy of bitcoin.
Bitcoin has been a beautiful success going on 8-years strong.
Thanks for the link. Everyone with half a brain should recognize that the unwillingness to increase the blocksize is driven by ulterior motives and greed. A second layer is unnecessary and opposite to Satoshi's stated goal of decentralization.
LJR actually wants SW because LJR makes money through merge mining and wants all the exploits available to get sidechains running to merge mine many coins and get lots of funds that most pool customers dont realise are possible to get from mining
Gmax wants SW+LN without a base block increase. because he wants the onchain fee to grow to allow all the BScartell LN hubs to charge more per LN 'payment' so that barry can recoup money from all the investments of his portfolio including blockstram and bloq.
EG if onchain was 10c LNwould have to charge 0.01cent.. but if onchain was $2 LN could charge 1cent and people would be somewhat "happy"
the gavin vs blockstream is just social drama of distraction trying to assume gavin became corporatised while cor secretly(back then) was the actual group becoming corporatised..
(standard point in opposite direction distraction technique)
Gmax wants SW+LN without a base block increase. because he wants the onchain fee to grow to allow all the BScartell LN hubs to charge more per LN 'payment' so that barry can recoup money from all the investments of his portfolio including blockstram and bloq.
EG if onchain was 10c LNwould have to charge 0.01cent.. but if onchain was $2 LN could charge 1cent and people would be somewhat "happy"
the gavin vs blockstream is just social drama of distraction trying to assume gavin became corporatised while cor secretly(back then) was the actual group becoming corporatised..
(standard point in opposite direction distraction technique)
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
Jump to: