I think the name is very bad for the original Bitcoin. Investors shall be confused with more Bitcoin coins and there will be less investments. Local stores are going to think "what a mess" and consumers are not adopting because there is no "clear simple story" to tell.
The next coin can be named
- Bitcoin Alt
- Bitcoin Crypt
- Bitcrypt Coin
- Bitcoin Cash
and so on. You made it a mess in the hope to fill your own pockets....
Even before the BTC is adopted worldwide by local stores and consumers, you are allready seeding confusion in a bad way.
Very very bad. And remember, till so far, only the BTC (and on some sites, LTC) is the "way out" to dollars or euro's.
This "way out" is as we speak the only reason that people in the street will adopt BTC as value.
So when you disadvantage the original BTC, you disadvantage yourself, your adopters, and your miners.
Bitcoin-scrypt shall never be accepted at your local stores and because of the name, you are delaying the needed adoption of the real BTC.
That adoption is needed to raise the value of the BTC, and in that way, all the other coins. The choice of this name brings damage to the whole process.
It's a pity....
First: I'm not the developer of Bitcoin sCrypt, just an early supporter
Second: Bitcoin sCrypt has been around since september and nobody got confused
Third: The name is great, it has Bitcoin specs but with scrypt algo, so Bitcoin sCrypt makes clear what it is
Fifth: I can't count