Add BetVIP ? I'd like to vote on 1.5
DirectBet 4.5
Predictious 3
Topic: BITCOIN SPORTS BETTING REVIEW - BEST BTC SPORTSBOOKS - 2018 (CUSTOMER FEEDBACK) - page 72. (Read 147673 times)
July 12, 2014, 12:53:13 PM
July 12, 2014, 05:45:40 AM
DirectBet voting 5 is a DirectBet shill. He voted low ratings for the top two books which doesn't make sense for a true voter.
We have been the victims of shill accounts, not the beneficiary.
3 users rated us 1 without any explanation, including yourself.
Ryan - I think you should disqualify all ratings of 1 that were made without any explanation on legitimate books. A rating of 1 is supposed to be reserved for scams.
It's true, if anyone want to give 1 he/she must explain why because it's clearly written in OP that 1 means terrible or most probably scam.
Ryank must not accept any rating of 1 without any proof.
July 12, 2014, 05:26:11 AM
DirectBet voting 5 is a DirectBet shill. He voted low ratings for the top two books which doesn't make sense for a true voter.
We have been the victims of shill accounts, not the beneficiary.
3 users rated us 1 without any explanation, including yourself.
Ryan - I think you should disqualify all ratings of 1 that were made without any explanation on legitimate books. A rating of 1 is supposed to be reserved for scams.
July 11, 2014, 11:33:04 PM
Whatever happened to btcsportsbet and btcsportsmatch?
Also it looks like bitbook fell off big time.
Also it looks like bitbook fell off big time.
Not sure about the first two but bitbook closed shop early this year.
July 11, 2014, 11:32:25 PM
I was going to rate but after reading this I will wait till I will have more posts.
Thanks! You are close, so come back soon!
July 11, 2014, 03:33:41 PM
Whatever happened to btcsportsbet and btcsportsmatch?
Also it looks like bitbook fell off big time.
Also it looks like bitbook fell off big time.
July 11, 2014, 02:14:49 PM
directbet 5
nitrogen 3
anonibet 2
nitrogen 3
anonibet 2
I'd really like to hear why anonibet was rated a 2 (TWO!)? Especially from a 3-day old account. Nothing against new players but I do think that he could have even made a '1' or '0' without any questions asked. Likewise, why 3 for nitrogen and 5 for direct bet? Seems like slightly suspicious ratings.
I think in order to turn this into a quality community review thread, you should require a 1 sentence reason behind each rating (as most have been doing anyway); and a sportsbook could jump in to say 'actually yes we do allow anonymous deposits' (or whatever the case may be). Otherwise it promotes shilling and prevents finding the 'true' crowd-wisdom-based ratings.
Another trick is look at the account activity AFTER the rating - you'll find some of them don't log in after posting their rating (literally the last they logged in was to post the rating
)I do think you should do this retrospectively btw; or, wait till you get more reviews then replace the old fake ones with real ones from real people.
Unfortunately there will always be some questionable scores placed here and there is not a good way around it. This is why I have the top and bottom 10% of scores taken off for the final rankings. It is at least a way to prevent it a bit. I feel that it has worked pretty well too. But yeah, I totally get where you are coming from... After thinking about it a little more I am raising the post limit for a score to count will be 20 instead of 10. Thanks for all the input everyone. I just want this to be the most accurate place to really see what books are doing a good job!
I was going to rate but after reading this I will wait till I will have more posts.
July 11, 2014, 01:53:43 PM
directbet 5
nitrogen 3
anonibet 2
nitrogen 3
anonibet 2
PocketRockets is a 1 because of this - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7709902
Thanks for the scores
Updated 7/11
July 11, 2014, 01:33:49 PM
I am voting for Nitrogen !
They have good support and they answer my question quickly or even have any problem .
They have good support and they answer my question quickly or even have any problem .
Give points between 1-5 not just I am voting for Nitrogen.
Yes please!
July 11, 2014, 01:28:10 PM
directbet 5
nitrogen 3
anonibet 2
nitrogen 3
anonibet 2
I'd really like to hear why anonibet was rated a 2 (TWO!)? Especially from a 3-day old account. Nothing against new players but I do think that he could have even made a '1' or '0' without any questions asked. Likewise, why 3 for nitrogen and 5 for direct bet? Seems like slightly suspicious ratings.
I think in order to turn this into a quality community review thread, you should require a 1 sentence reason behind each rating (as most have been doing anyway); and a sportsbook could jump in to say 'actually yes we do allow anonymous deposits' (or whatever the case may be). Otherwise it promotes shilling and prevents finding the 'true' crowd-wisdom-based ratings.
Another trick is look at the account activity AFTER the rating - you'll find some of them don't log in after posting their rating (literally the last they logged in was to post the rating
)I do think you should do this retrospectively btw; or, wait till you get more reviews then replace the old fake ones with real ones from real people.
Unfortunately there will always be some questionable scores placed here and there is not a good way around it. This is why I have the top and bottom 10% of scores taken off for the final rankings. It is at least a way to prevent it a bit. I feel that it has worked pretty well too. But yeah, I totally get where you are coming from... After thinking about it a little more I am raising the post limit for a score to count will be 20 instead of 10. Thanks for all the input everyone. I just want this to be the most accurate place to really see what books are doing a good job!
July 11, 2014, 11:43:16 AM
Maybe a good idea is also to make a table with all the features that sportbook has/hasn't
July 11, 2014, 11:39:45 AM
I am voting for Nitrogen !
They have good support and they answer my question quickly or even have any problem .
They have good support and they answer my question quickly or even have any problem .
Give points between 1-5 not just I am voting for Nitrogen.
July 11, 2014, 11:31:14 AM
I am voting for Nitrogen !
They have good support and they answer my question quickly or even have any problem .
They have good support and they answer my question quickly or even have any problem .
July 11, 2014, 11:31:07 AM
I like the idea of having a 10 post minimum or setting something else to prevent shills. DirectBet voting 5 is a DirectBet shill. He voted low ratings for the top two books which doesn't make sense for a true voter.
Books should stay out of this thread and not promote their case. This is a great thread but keep the books out of here. It will be a unique rating guide.
Books should stay out of this thread and not promote their case. This is a great thread but keep the books out of here. It will be a unique rating guide.
July 11, 2014, 11:06:04 AM
directbet 5
nitrogen 3
anonibet 2
nitrogen 3
anonibet 2
I'd really like to hear why anonibet was rated a 2 (TWO!)? Especially from a 3-day old account. Nothing against new players but I do think that he could have even made a '1' or '0' without any questions asked. Likewise, why 3 for nitrogen and 5 for direct bet? Seems like slightly suspicious ratings.
I think in order to turn this into a quality community review thread, you should require a 1 sentence reason behind each rating (as most have been doing anyway); and a sportsbook could jump in to say 'actually yes we do allow anonymous deposits' (or whatever the case may be). Otherwise it promotes shilling and prevents finding the 'true' crowd-wisdom-based ratings.
Another trick is look at the account activity AFTER the rating - you'll find some of them don't log in after posting their rating (literally the last they logged in was to post the rating
)I do think you should do this retrospectively btw; or, wait till you get more reviews then replace the old fake ones with real ones from real people.
Well spoted Betmoose! Thank you.
That is the reason I asked Ryank to set some critirea before accpting any rating. Because making new account is just some click away and another thing it is acceptable here. You can hold more then 1 account there.
July 11, 2014, 11:02:12 AM
directbet 5
nitrogen 3
anonibet 2
nitrogen 3
anonibet 2
I'd really like to hear why anonibet was rated a 2 (TWO!)? Especially from a 3-day old account. Nothing against new players but I do think that he could have even made a '1' or '0' without any questions asked. Likewise, why 3 for nitrogen and 5 for direct bet? Seems like slightly suspicious ratings.
I think in order to turn this into a quality community review thread, you should require a 1 sentence reason behind each rating (as most have been doing anyway); and a sportsbook could jump in to say 'actually yes we do allow anonymous deposits' (or whatever the case may be). Otherwise it promotes shilling and prevents finding the 'true' crowd-wisdom-based ratings.
Another trick is look at the account activity AFTER the rating - you'll find some of them don't log in after posting their rating (literally the last they logged in was to post the rating
)I do think you should do this retrospectively btw; or, wait till you get more reviews then replace the old fake ones with real ones from real people.
Well spoted Betmoose! Thank you.
July 11, 2014, 10:46:52 AM
tdsports.co.nr
Always free goodies awesome support. Great deposit options, licensed by Government of Curaçao.
Poker room is winning poker network with a beginners bankroll.
Always free goodies awesome support. Great deposit options, licensed by Government of Curaçao.
Poker room is winning poker network with a beginners bankroll.
July 11, 2014, 10:32:03 AM
directbet 5
nitrogen 3
anonibet 2
nitrogen 3
anonibet 2
I'd really like to hear why anonibet was rated a 2 (TWO!)? Especially from a 3-day old account. Nothing against new players but I do think that he could have even made a '1' or '0' without any questions asked. Likewise, why 3 for nitrogen and 5 for direct bet? Seems like slightly suspicious ratings.
I think in order to turn this into a quality community review thread, you should require a 1 sentence reason behind each rating (as most have been doing anyway); and a sportsbook could jump in to say 'actually yes we do allow anonymous deposits' (or whatever the case may be). Otherwise it promotes shilling and prevents finding the 'true' crowd-wisdom-based ratings.
Another trick is look at the account activity AFTER the rating - you'll find some of them don't log in after posting their rating (literally the last they logged in was to post the rating
)I do think you should do this retrospectively btw; or, wait till you get more reviews then replace the old fake ones with real ones from real people.
July 11, 2014, 07:49:18 AM
directbet 5
nitrogen 3
anonibet 2
nitrogen 3
anonibet 2
July 11, 2014, 12:03:03 AM
From this point on scores will only count from users with at least 10 posts.
Thanks everyone
Thanks everyone
Jump to: