segwit does not solve intentional spam, malicious users just wont use p2wpkh keys
segwit does not solve intentional quadratics, malicious users just wont use p2wpkh keys
LN does not solve intentional spam, malicious users just wont use LN hops or hubs.
the only way i can see that will sort out the fee war and the intentional real spam, without much drastic action is to introduce a new "priority formulae" that actually does a proper job of sorting out the spammers from the normal users
segwit does not solve intentional quadratics, malicious users just wont use p2wpkh keys
LN does not solve intentional spam, malicious users just wont use LN hops or hubs.
the only way i can see that will sort out the fee war and the intentional real spam, without much drastic action is to introduce a new "priority formulae" that actually does a proper job of sorting out the spammers from the normal users
And the spammers sorted out with this formula couldn't use Bitcoin? Banned of Blockchain?
The spammer sorted out would be the address, and this person can create another address and spam again a transaction and again with many other new addresses.
what if there was a formulae that NEVER gave priority unless someones funds were aged atleast a day or they added a CLTV maturity period of a day.
also where the more bloated their transaction was or the more they wanted to bypass the 1day delay to respend sooner would cost them dearly
EG where those genuine/moral users that want to spend more then once a day can save some costs using the voluntary side services such as LN.
while leaving malicious intentional spammers who would refuse to use LN as it doesnt serve their malicious intent, left waiting or paying alot
