Topic: Bitcoin vs Bitcoin Cash - page 3. (Read 826 times)

I think bitcoin will be much more effective than BCH, you should consider

I also prefer with bitcoin cash (BCH) rather than bitcoin (BTC). I chose BCH because BCH able to accommodate block of 8 MB while BTC only able to accommodate block of 1 MB only. Besides that, in terms of security, I prefer BCH. When hard fork occurs, the bitcoin network becomes instable so sometimes bitcoin transactions will be temporarily suspended. While BCH tends to be stable and transactions can still be done even though it is in a hard fork.

I prefer bitcoin cash. Is it not the presence of this bitcoin cash to improve the weakness of transactions on bitcoin? The presence of bitcoin cash is motivated by the slow ability of bitcoin in conducting large-scale transactions. Bitcoin is only able to process approximately 6 to 7 transactions and it takes 10 minutes. An old process is not it? Compared to banks, banks are able to process VISA credit card transactions of 1,600 transactions per second. This is what motivates developers to make improvements. If not, then bitcoin will be increasingly abandoned. Although bitcoin cash is relatively young but I prefer bitcoin cash rather than bitcoin.

Both Cash & Core are forks of the original Bitcoin, neither is the original since the community split during the forks, some went with one some went with the other.

While the miners just play both sides by mining both. 

i dont follow ver.. which again is your failing to understand. you think people need to follow.. (facepalm)
you are so stuck in the follower mindset that you think its the only thing available. you need to learn the concept of decentralisation, urgently.
thats the problem with sheep they think if your not following the farmer you must be following the sheepdog.

what the sheep dont realise is the farmer and the sheep are working together

segwit was implemented in a few days.. with their MANDATORY consensus bypass crap on august 1st!!

prior to the august event they didnt want to admit thir power. but at a cost to them only having 35% consensus.. so instead of backing off and finding a compromise that consensus would agree with.. they instead revealed their power.

real funny part.. you cant ignore the data, as its wrote into the blockchain.
you cant denie the core devs admitting their corruption. they even made pictures of it to make it obvious..

all you can try and do is to pretend im a ver fanboy..
what a silly pointless rebuttle that makes especially when its not the case.

P.S why are you not talking about BLOQ, the bilateral split.
why are you not taking about the up/downstream filers/bridging that TRULY makes segwit not backward compatible (in a network bug event. where segwit nodes cant translate, thus the segwit blocks are not compatible with legacy nodes)

and dont bother replying with just a point finger at a ver fanclub as your answer to anything anti core

..
P.S
when core defenders cannot rebut the obvious. all they can do is pretend a core opposer must be pidgeon holed into a fanclub of someone else..
but never do these core defenders ever consider that people can be decentralsied and hate cores centralisation.. all the core fanboys can comprehend is fanclubs of x or y. centralisation is all they understand because they have not experienced decentralisation.
...
the reason i dont follow ver is simple.  i have explained it SEVERAL TIMES to you specifically.
ver is on the same team those that want core to own bitcoin. (dcg.io)

its reserve psychology..

lets try it in another analogy. because real data, real quotes from core devs themselves seems to blow right past you.
womens hair.
no one should own the brand "blonde" but one brunette bleaches her hair blonde and wants to be the centre of attention as the one true and only blonde.
she gets her sister VERa whos a red head to scream out that strawberry blonde is the new blonde. all so that friends of the bleach blonde can argue that ginger is just ginger and will never be blonde and that bleach blonde is the one true blonde.

in my eyes neither are blonde.
there is
strawberry blonde
bleache blonde
but neither should own the brand blonde. and neither should say only they are THE blonde..

other blonde in the blonde community would get rekt and their hair forked out with scissors by the bleach blonde if they tried to say they were THE blonde. they would get told to dye off their hair to another colour if they tried to take blonde brand away from bleache blonde

so with bleache blonde now controlling the blonde community with her forks and scissor powers. we should still not let bleache blonde own the brand blonde.
and instead call the community she monarchs over bleache blonde until she backs down and declares to drop the rekt campaignes and forks and scirrors against other blondes. thus allowing othr blondes to as a community consensus go back to how things were a few years ago

In terms of advantages, I can not say for sure, but in terms of growth rate, I see that BCH has higher speed than BTC, and when decreasing, BCH is always lower. I find that BCH is quite a potential coin in the market, perhaps I will decide to buy some of the CCH holds for the future to come. They are really safe, I believe in the BCH.

If I still trust bitcoin to experience rapid development in the next few years because the presence of many enthusiasts will certainly increase the bitcoin to be popular because long-term investments are most effective in generating profits.

Bitcoin was the first ever cryptocurrecy and today Bitcoin is the most valuable   cryptocurrency currently on the market. while other currencies are attempting to outrank Bitcoin and reduce it's dominance over the dogital-coin sector, few are getting close. However, Bitcoin cash may be an exception to that due to the difference between Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash.!

I believe bitcoin will become more scalable and efficient in the long term. because I prefer Bitcoin more then Bitcoin cash, it's more sustainable. strong and balanced in my eyes.

Bitcoin is good as currency and as investment at the same time, we can now buy all kind of goods we can even save it for our future, bitcoin is best to hold for long time we can trade with bitcoin we can invest and mine as well but this all needs patience if you have patience you will never lose at your investment, so keep on using bitcoin to buy good and to get profit at the same time.

i think bitcoin is still more efficient than any other and it will still do well in future

Unlike you we know who to follow. We know who the good developers are. You follow Roger Ver and believe in his propaganda. You are the sheep.

Bitcoin Cash will be better without Roger Ver and his friend Craig Wright.


You can make your own Bitcoin impelementation if you like.


Bitcoin development is not centralized. The Core developers have no power over the users, the miners, the WHOLE community? If they did then Segwit would have been implemented in a few days without the drama.


I already did my research. I was confused in the beginning. In this forum I asked questions and learned from you and Fyookball. But I also learned from achow and Danny Hamilton.

You know my position and we can debate all day.


Yes to follow, like how you follow Roger Ver. You are the only people who call Bitcoin "Bitcoin Core".

People often use bitcoin rather than bitcoin in cash. Bitcoin is trusted by many investors and used in payment services in developed countries around the world. The bitcoin price is rising because of its usefulness for everyone. Bitcoin cash is not as popular as bitcoin, but in the future they will also grow.

both have similar advantages, and I prefer to Bitcoin Cash
in trading, I do not like the expensive coins, because to get profit, I have to wait a long time
because I am a fast-paced trader

With out any doubt i'll choose bitcoin. Because father remains father. High five

Bitcoin is far ahead from bitcoin cash. Bitcoin is the market leader of this market and they are less risky than bitcoin cash. Bitcoins transaction system is also easier from bitcoin cash. So i suggest you invest on bitcoin.

I don't like everything around Bcash, but Roger has always been a great source of marketing for Bitcoin in the very early days. Too bad he has completely lost his mind in the worst possible way.

The reason he doesn't consider his Bcash project to be an altcoin is because of his plan to surpass Bitcoin at some point in the future. It's his only option left after having failed to take over Bitcoin with other toxic beings.

I don't hate him. I think he is mentally challenged and actually believes he's following the right path. It makes him look like someone badly in need of professional help, and every serious investor can see that.

No one in his right mind will pump millions in Bcash other than Roger himself.

It is true that Bitcoin cash is a fork of the original Bitcoin in the name of de-congesting the network but then the originality of the bitcoin framework is immeasurable compared to other networks that exist on the framework. thanks

Well, I will not tell you which one is better but personally I support Bitcoin. Bitcoin is a good platform to invest and it has a very good potential to make you profitable. Moreover, I believe Bitcoin is far away better that Bitcoin cash.

On chain scaling does not increase as fast as the block size increases. Eventually you're just going to have huge blocks with no priority. I think the off-chain solutions offered by Bitcoin, or even Ethereum's Raiden network pose a much more plausible solution to the scaling issue. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised if we don't see some amalgamation between a sharding type and off-chain solution.