I will agree with @barnabe, if it's about security money for long-term, gold is definitely safer than bitcoin. I personally think that choosing between the two is based on what is your purpose of investing. Within just half a year, a lot of unexpected things already happened like this pandemic. And we are still not sure what will happen next, so if you are planning on a long-run investment just to secure funds, for me it's gold. But if you will be investing for the purpose of potential profit, bitcoin is better because of its volatility.
I don't why we keep comparing these two when we can just understand the fact that gold is not bitcoin, bitcoin is not gold and will never be it. Now asking about asset safety, then it should be gold and not bitcoin simply because the value of bitcoin is volatile that should be enough basis to call it a risky asset. Then we have gold that we have been using as a storage of value for ages, backing nation's wealth with it, creating precious jewelry that costs thousands. Would that not be enough to call an end to this discussion?
I think this topic of which is better as a safe haven has been discussed here in the forum for a lot of time. But for me, it's really not necessary to compare Bitcoin and gold because they are different from each other. The answer to this will still vary from different perspectives
My very point. The thing is they are comparing bitcoin to gold is because of the price, but they are disregarding the quantity of each.
It is very simple, if you want to have a volatile asset where you can gain in a short time possible then go with risky asset, do the opposite otherwise.