Topic: Bitcoin War - page 2. (Read 453 times)
The whole world is trying their best to move to peace and live in peace. Even the ones that are having problems and war are going into peace accord. I don't think that any body or any government will be interested to fight a war because of bitcoin. Assuming Bitcoin is own by a particular country the war might come as country vs country. Assuming Satoshi is known now it will be possible to be fighting Satoshi and his country men. Now that Bitcoin does not belong to anyone how will the fight happen and who will be fighting against who? There will be nothing like international war because of bitcoin.
Do you anticipate a future in which there is a large-scale battle between pro-and anti-Bitcoin nations?
Bitcoin can not be forced on any nation either now or in the future because it was not built to enjoy government backing.
So we have a marvel-like ending...or DC at its darkest and weirdest. But regardless of that we have them together in a fight for the good.
I do not understand what the conflicting probitcoin countries have to do with those who oppose its use, today we are in the retrograde thinking of wars and confrontations, but I think that in the long term this type of thinking must change for the good of existence, although this somewhat utopian thought is not even seen in the near future when we have the world at the gates of a war due to differences in persistent ideas of individuals and not of groups (the people), nobody in their right mind wants a war.
Based on the foregoing, without a doubt, any principle of success capitalized on hegemony, dominance and control, questions powerful third parties who, by not having that access or losing leadership due to the use of a technology such as bitcoin, consider brute force. But come on, for now that's just a guess in the mind of someone who watches a lot of streaming on disney plus. (imo).
I do not understand what the conflicting probitcoin countries have to do with those who oppose its use, today we are in the retrograde thinking of wars and confrontations, but I think that in the long term this type of thinking must change for the good of existence, although this somewhat utopian thought is not even seen in the near future when we have the world at the gates of a war due to differences in persistent ideas of individuals and not of groups (the people), nobody in their right mind wants a war.
Based on the foregoing, without a doubt, any principle of success capitalized on hegemony, dominance and control, questions powerful third parties who, by not having that access or losing leadership due to the use of a technology such as bitcoin, consider brute force. But come on, for now that's just a guess in the mind of someone who watches a lot of streaming on disney plus. (imo).
Using bitcoin or adopting bitcoin is a choice that can be taken or not. If the cons with bitcoin might just ban it without having to fight because of the pros and cons of bitcoin.
Bitcoin will not be a threat to Fiat. Fiat and Bitcoin can go hand in hand and have their respective functions.
So some developing countries or developed countries can choose what to do. adopt it or not, it depends on each regulation without having to go to war.
Bitcoin will never compete or replace fiat in the long run so there's no valid reason that everything will end up in a war between pro bitcoin and anti bitcoin. Its only invented as an asset or investment, and if the government accept it, it will be a great option for fiat. But if not, it will always retain as a good investment. Bitcoin as part of cryptocurrencies, may be considered as the biggest financial innovation of the century, but each country has their own view about that so they are free to decide whether to accept it or not. Bitcoin will not be a threat to Fiat. Fiat and Bitcoin can go hand in hand and have their respective functions.
So some developing countries or developed countries can choose what to do. adopt it or not, it depends on each regulation without having to go to war.
Using bitcoin or adopting bitcoin is a choice that can be taken or not. If the cons with bitcoin might just ban it without having to fight because of the pros and cons of bitcoin.
Bitcoin will not be a threat to Fiat. Fiat and Bitcoin can go hand in hand and have their respective functions.
So some developing countries or developed countries can choose what to do. adopt it or not, it depends on each regulation without having to go to war.
Bitcoin will not be a threat to Fiat. Fiat and Bitcoin can go hand in hand and have their respective functions.
So some developing countries or developed countries can choose what to do. adopt it or not, it depends on each regulation without having to go to war.
Countries going in political war is pretty much it for most times and they are generally not going to take it that far for something as trivial as a currency, there can definitely be nations and banks opposing the situations, for example in El Salvador as well, they were refused the loans by banks if they did not go back on their whole bitcoin economy decision. This is the kind of control that might be forced on some nations. But war is quite a bit word. Political, economical things can be very well be solved by simple laws and chats which is quite preferable
I doubt that such a scenario could happen sooner or later.
According to the human history, wars are made for energy resources including foods. Bitcoin and other forms of symbolic value like bitcoin and paper money are not resources of energy. In addition to the fact that anti-bitcoin nations (if any) won't be that dumb to start a war against those using bitcoin ; at worst scenarios they can apply sanctions but i also doubt it to happen.
According to the human history, wars are made for energy resources including foods. Bitcoin and other forms of symbolic value like bitcoin and paper money are not resources of energy. In addition to the fact that anti-bitcoin nations (if any) won't be that dumb to start a war against those using bitcoin ; at worst scenarios they can apply sanctions but i also doubt it to happen.
Authoritarian governments would very certainly fight to maintain their use of money as a control device.
Do you anticipate a future in which there is a large-scale battle between pro-and anti-Bitcoin nations?
I don't believe that's a very likely scenario, but it's a concept I've had, and I'd want to hear your thoughts on it.
Thanks!
Do you anticipate a future in which there is a large-scale battle between pro-and anti-Bitcoin nations?
I don't believe that's a very likely scenario, but it's a concept I've had, and I'd want to hear your thoughts on it.
Thanks!
Are you thinking that there might be a time when countries go to war because of Bitcoin 
Neh, that is not happening regardless of how wants to adopt Bitcoin as a legal tender or not or even those that just accept to allow its trade as an asset even if not as a legal tender. I don't think Bitcoin is that type of asset that can lead to that and besides, how many percentage is left to mine anyways that they will want to fight over. 
Not a war, but the pro Bitcoin countries will see increased wealth, such as El Salvador.
If there comes a world crisis, product of the collapse of the USD and other FIATs, this might become more evident. Could it cause some jealously enough to warrant war? I doubt it, but who knows.
If there comes a world crisis, product of the collapse of the USD and other FIATs, this might become more evident. Could it cause some jealously enough to warrant war? I doubt it, but who knows.
What do you mean by "large scale battle"?Do you mean a real war?No,I don't think so.
Even the so called "pro-Bitcoin" countries aren't that "pro-Bitcoin"(maybe except El Salvador).
They are more like neutral and liberal towards Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies,but that doesn't mean that they actually like Bitcoin/crypto.No country in the world would bother fighting for Bitcoin.
There's always a possibility for the pro-Bitcoin countries to become anti-Bitcoin.
El Salvador turned into a pro-Bitcoin country only because the president of El Salvador is a hardcore Bitcoin maximalist,not because the people of El Salvador are really fascinated of Bitcoin.
Even the so called "pro-Bitcoin" countries aren't that "pro-Bitcoin"(maybe except El Salvador).
They are more like neutral and liberal towards Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies,but that doesn't mean that they actually like Bitcoin/crypto.No country in the world would bother fighting for Bitcoin.
There's always a possibility for the pro-Bitcoin countries to become anti-Bitcoin.
El Salvador turned into a pro-Bitcoin country only because the president of El Salvador is a hardcore Bitcoin maximalist,not because the people of El Salvador are really fascinated of Bitcoin.
Authoritarian governments would very certainly fight to maintain their use of money as a control device.
Do you anticipate a future in which there is a large-scale battle between pro-and anti-Bitcoin nations?
I don't believe that's a very likely scenario, but it's a concept I've had, and I'd want to hear your thoughts on it.
Thanks!
Why would countries need to have battle after realizing that crypto (bitcoin) will bring help to their country and economy?Do you anticipate a future in which there is a large-scale battle between pro-and anti-Bitcoin nations?
I don't believe that's a very likely scenario, but it's a concept I've had, and I'd want to hear your thoughts on it.
Thanks!
I'm sure they will be adopting this than battling for this.
Bitcoin maybe still in process of acceptance but most of the countries that had realized that is now making their way investing here.
You hear too much about that but you may not search for the other news.
Maybe there is a pro and anti-bitcoin, but that does not mean there is a large-scale battle that can happen.
So far, bitcoin can be traded in many countries and many people already use bitcoin without a problem, although maybe some people can use bitcoin as other people.
But that does not mean we will face a big battle between pro and anti-bitcoin.
So I advise you to calm down and not just trust the source of what you read but search for more information will be better than filtering everything.
Maybe there is a pro and anti-bitcoin, but that does not mean there is a large-scale battle that can happen.
So far, bitcoin can be traded in many countries and many people already use bitcoin without a problem, although maybe some people can use bitcoin as other people.
But that does not mean we will face a big battle between pro and anti-bitcoin.
So I advise you to calm down and not just trust the source of what you read but search for more information will be better than filtering everything.
No, I don't think there will be such a war. It would be pointless. If we have different states where cryptocurrency will be allowed or prohibited, there is no point in fighting between them. The state in which the cryptocurrency is legalized will benefit from its circulation on its territory and it will be practically indifferent to it how the cryptocurrency is treated nearby. Also, the state in which cryptocurrency is prohibited for circulation will not lose anything. I see no point in starting a war with those states that have allowed cryptocurrency. Unrest can be within the state if the people are infringed on the right to use cryptocurrency.
Authoritarian governments would very certainly fight to maintain their use of money as a control device.
Do you anticipate a future in which there is a large-scale battle between pro-and anti-Bitcoin nations?
I don't believe that's a very likely scenario, but it's a concept I've had, and I'd want to hear your thoughts on it.
Thanks!
Do you anticipate a future in which there is a large-scale battle between pro-and anti-Bitcoin nations?
I don't believe that's a very likely scenario, but it's a concept I've had, and I'd want to hear your thoughts on it.
Thanks!
Why would there would be a war between those nation who accept bitcoins and those who do not accept bitcoins ?
This is the internal countires descsion and it has nothing to do with the outside world. However in order to build pressure on those who legalizes bitcoins, the other anti bitcoin nations may try to enforce sactions on them through international monetary department. Even if there is a war, it wont be a physical one.
No, that'd be pretty dumb. I mean, they can just let them do what they want to do, It's not like being anti Bitcoin requires you to destroy every remnant of it from existence, just don't use it, pretty sure it won't affect you. Plus, wars would probably be a last resort kind of thing in situations where it actually makes sense, a fight between pro and anti Bitcoin isn't one of them. If wars were started over stuff like that, we would've had a LOT of wars already just because of the fact that different countries use different fiats (or even different beliefs,religions, etc.)
Do you anticipate a future in which there is a large-scale battle between pro-and anti-Bitcoin nations?
There are always two opposite sides: supporters and protesters. They are from personal, institutional to governmental levels.There will be nations which support, make Bitcoin as legal tender and nations which don't accept Bitcoin. It is like Communism and Capitalism but there will always be a dominating side like Capitalism dominates the world.
Because I am Bitcoiner, I believe that in future, there will be more nations which accept Bitcoin than don't accept it.
Authoritarian governments would very certainly fight to maintain their use of money as a control device.
Do you anticipate a future in which there is a large-scale battle between pro-and anti-Bitcoin nations?
I don't believe that's a very likely scenario, but it's a concept I've had, and I'd want to hear your thoughts on it.
Thanks!
Do you anticipate a future in which there is a large-scale battle between pro-and anti-Bitcoin nations?
I don't believe that's a very likely scenario, but it's a concept I've had, and I'd want to hear your thoughts on it.
Thanks!
I think there's more pending issues to discuss by countries though, specially political and in economics. I doubt that bitcoin will be any of those priorities. And this has been discuss by G7 in their summit so I guess at a sense they have been tackling bitcoin fo the last 5 years or so and we never heard of any of them battling it out on the floor, except maybe talking about the pros and cons of crypto in general and what could be the effect on countries.
If the mankind continues to choose the stupidest and destructive of all the paths laid out for us to decide our future, pretty sure that we're probably going to see that kind of war although I don't think that we're going to see it anytime soon, even if the scale is slowly tethering towards the demise of our civilization, there's still people fighting out there for us to not go down to that point. Also, I don't think that the war would be more digital rather than a physical one because if you compare it to the wars throughout human history, the reason for bitcoin war is petty to become a full scale war.
It's too shallow to end with that idea but just with our curiosity, we build thoughts like this.
There's no need for a war, that's too harsh. Whom do they are fighting for? A nation that's bitcoin friendly, there's no need to hate them and have them on a war.
Those anti-bitcoin nations, the solution is simple. A ban, that's all they need to do.
There's no need for a war, that's too harsh. Whom do they are fighting for? A nation that's bitcoin friendly, there's no need to hate them and have them on a war.
Those anti-bitcoin nations, the solution is simple. A ban, that's all they need to do.
Fighting against bitcoin is like fighting against the internet or against social media. If the whole world turned into North Korea, then we could talk about such a fight, but right now it seems useless to me. For example, China recently banned mining and cryptocurrencies, but in general nothing happened.
Jump to: