Pages:
Author

Topic: Bitcoin will inevitably Fail as Altcoins suceed - page 2. (Read 3964 times)

donator
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1014
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
I always think about ipv6 and ipv4 in this comparison.

I don't think this comparison is valid or interesting.
Bitcoin is more like a higher layer protocol over TCP/IP, I like comparing it to UUCP that had limited applications.
IIRC Gavin recently observed that a better analogy would be ethernet replacing token ring.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 260
I always think about ipv6 and ipv4 in this comparison.

I don't think this comparison is valid or interesting.
Bitcoin is more like a higher layer protocol over TCP/IP, I like comparing it to UUCP that had limited applications.
legendary
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1008
Delusional crypto obsessionist
The quality of the people involved with the sdiechain whitepaper shows that at least some prominent knowledgeable Bitcoiners recognize that altcoins technology is pretty interesting and even superior in many aspects to Bitcoin.
Just as no one knew where bitcoin would be a couple of years ago, no one knows where altcoins will be over the horizon. And the horizon is not that far away
I always think about ipv6 and ipv4 in this comparison.
ipv6 is vastly superior to ipv4 but few people really know anything about it or are using it.
Why should I go for ipv6 when ipv4 also works (I know there are benefits and more ip adresses)?

And to compare it with cryptocurrency makes altcoins even less interesting in my opinion because there is value involved with bitcoin.
People want their precious bitcoins to be valuable so there is even less incentive to move to alts, how brilliant they are.
ipv4 = bitcoin
ipv6 = brilliant mega super duper other unicorn coin
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
The quality of the people involved with the sdiechain whitepaper shows that at least some prominent knowledgeable Bitcoiners recognize that altcoins technology is pretty interesting and even superior in many aspects to Bitcoin.
Just as no one knew where bitcoin would be a couple of years ago, no one knows where altcoins will be over the horizon. And the horizon is not that far away
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
MtGox, man! Still haunting us up till today. It's like that STI that you can't get rid off no matter what you try.
full member
Activity: 120
Merit: 100
Why do you want to be terrorist giving this type of news? Relax, no one know future and no one know what will happen.
hero member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 783
better everyday ♥
Aren't Altcoins derivative from this first coin?  Homework done.

Some are (copycat), some are far from it. Homework not done.

Anything after the first, is derivative or copying some aspect of the first.  Don't tell me you have some stake in some of those crappy alts?
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 260
Aren't Altcoins derivative from this first coin?  Homework done.

Some are (copycat), some are far from it. Homework not done.
hero member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 783
better everyday ♥
the fact of the matter is all Altcoins are copycat, gimmicky pump and dump schemes.

You obviously haven't done your homework.

How so?  Isn't Bitcoin the first and original coin created by Satoshi Nakamoto based on the old Hashcash.  Yea, I read the white paper.   Wink

Aren't Altcoins derivative from this first coin?  Homework done.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 260
the fact of the matter is all Altcoins are copycat, gimmicky pump and dump schemes.

You obviously haven't done your homework.
hero member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 783
better everyday ♥
It's funny the OP make all these untrue points, but the fact of the matter is all Altcoins are copycat, gimmicky pump and dump schemes.

I mean Dogecoin was the biggest Alt for awhile based on an Internet Meme, and we're supposed to take Altcoins seriously?

legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
mining is so 2012-2013
hero member
Activity: 759
Merit: 502
Centralized currency is issued by some entity and nobody else can control it, no matter what. It can be argued Bitcoin cannot be centralized, because anybody can put as much hashpower as he likes and have own fee per transaction policy for his blocks. Obviously many have expensive electricity so they cannot be much competetive, but this is not Bitcoin fault.
Q7
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
The thing is that if you create an altcoin that resembles everything that bitcoin has or even better, from name, coin specs, that altcoin will still fail. Bitcoin is there and is currently there by virtue because it is the first. And if bitcoin fails, no other altcoin will ever reach the level bitcoin has gained. People will lose confidence in crypto *completely* and that is that.

The question on whether bitcoin will fail remains to be answered. 4 years back they say it was going to fail but it didn't. The signs are there, the vulnerability is there, the word decentralization makes no sense, however that doesn't mean that it is going to fail and flop completely tomorrow. We'll just have to see...
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
Even if satoshi have 1 mil coins and he decides to dump it, market will eat them all up, just like it ate those 30K some weeks ago. There are just too many ppl trusting and invested in btc.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
AltoCenter.com
Bitcoin will never fall, you know why? Because it will always have criticism like this making it last even more. Many altcoins came and gone, but bitcoin is still here. So as far as those who follows bitcoin remains loyal, bitcoin will survive.
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Brainwashed this way
1) Pure speculation. No one knows what he has, not for sure so 1million is assumed. Since you speculated I'll speculate. You can believe those coins are part of the overall plan and are safe with instructions left in case something happened to him. And NO it doesn't bother me.

2) The Bitcoin Foundation does not own or represent Bitcoin. Most of those idiots are gone anyway. I hate Gavin getting paid by them, but it's better than the government paying the lowest bidder to try to do the job. Remember we still have people like Andreas and gmaxwell on our side.

3) Mining is not centralized, I own a small farm and that's first hand knowledge. There are solutions for the 51% attack situation. When the fix needs to be implimented it will be. Gavin and others have had the solution(s) ready for awhile now. There are also permanent solutions out there they just haven't been implemented yet. Peter Todd is nobody. He was trying to get his way and at the same time saw a chance to sell half his coins without people raising a brow. The whole 51% thing just makes good press, it's all about selling fear, thats why you never hear that a 51% attack would be noticed immediately and the fix would shut the attack down almost immediately making all the attackers blocks invalid. To the normal citizen Bitcoin user it would be a small "hiccup" and banks have big "hiccups" all the time and no one really complains. Banks even close on the weekends and are getting hacked/fraud/ID thefts daily. The public knows about the 51% issue and watches for it and they know there is a quick fix if it would happen before a permanent solution is in place. The reason they won't is because Bitcoin is not a "Scamcoin".
http://gavintech.blogspot.com/2012/05/neutralizing-51-attack.html?m=1
https://bitcoinfoundation.org/2014/07/mining-decentralisation-the-low-hanging-fruit/
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/multi-pps-281180

4) Your talking about MtGox in 2012. Every aspect of that operation was a scam from the day they opened. No body cares about MtGox. Exchanges don't operate like that anymore, there's too many eyes watching now. That's ancient history of the start up phase of Bitcoin. That place was ran by kids. Most of us knew that at least a year before they shut down. That's called growing pains. Exchanges today have insured accounts. That's called stability. I myself have four bots trading Btc-e and Circle wallets with MY coins insured 100%. I still keep most in Armory offline. As the person above me stated "All markets are manipulated".
legendary
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1008
Delusional crypto obsessionist

1) Satoshi Nakamoto owns a reported 1,000,000(1million) bitcoins. Does anyone else see the huge huge problem with this?
No. Wold love them to own them myself

2) The Bitcoin Foundation, or the board representing Bitcoin, is full of illegal activity with dozens of former foundation members resigning from their positions this year.
They are a bunch of people who do not represent me. I did not choose them, neither did they chose me.

3) Bitcoin is centralized. It is controlled by the mining pools.
But who controls the hashing? The miners! There are a lot of them.

4) The most damming evidence of Bitcoin's certain death as of right now(excluding Satoshi's huge 1million Bitcoin stash) however, is Willy.
All markets are manipulated.
Alt-coins even more.

No offense, but to me your story really sounds like trolling.
I suggest you sell all your bitcoins and trade them for your beloved alts.
I will happily buy the bitcoin from you.
Now that I think of it, I should buy some extra bitcoins right now.


legendary
Activity: 1267
Merit: 1000
A little info about me: I'm a decent sized Bitcoin holder, having a little under 1,000 bitcoins as of right now. I bought most of them in late 2012 and sold quite a bit more around mid 2013. Anyway, at the beginning I entertained the thought that Bitcoin will truly change the world and become a revolutionary, unstoppable force. But, after really looking at both sides of the story, I realized that Bitcoin is doomed to fail no matter how much media exposure it gets. I know what I type below seems hypocritical, with myself owning Bitcoins, but I can't hold it in any longer and watch all the brainwashing go on in this forum. I truly do not believe that Bitcoin will stay on top the next coming years, for the reasons listed below, it's(Bitcoin's) entire history has been falsified. I have recently turned my attention away from Bitcoin and into Altcoins, which believe it or not, lack the faults that Bitcoin has below and improve on nearly everything that Bitcoin can't.

Basically I've come up with a few basic reasons why everything we knew about Bitcoin, price wise, has been false, and that the entire market is 100% manipulation and games.



Interesting... you bought BTC in 2012, yet registered new here today?
Where did you first learn about BTC if it wasn't here?
I have to agree with you on the Bitcoin Foundation and the fact that Gavin is paid by them.
The wordpress article on the bot was quite excellent - are you the author of that research?

legendary
Activity: 888
Merit: 1000
Monero - secure, private and untraceable currency.
1) Satoshi Nakamoto owns a reported 1,000,000(1million) bitcoins. Does anyone else see the huge huge problem with this? If Satoshi's bitcoin wallet or addresses were hacked or taken control of by a relative, friend, or others and they decided to even sell a fraction of the coins, coupled with the already uncertain market, Bitcoin's price will plummet to less than $1 per coin. Honestly, Satoshi owning 1million bitcoins has doomed Bitcoin from the start. This is one of the Major reasons why so few legit organzations are out there accepting Bitcoin as a means of payment and another reason why most people looking at Bitcoin think of it as a ponzi scheme(which it is) or scam.

Yes, this is a bit of a problem, but it's not guaranteed it will turn out badly. It even can turn out good, read what I think Satoshi would do with his enormous wealth: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8840162

Also, fact Satoshi has so much coins does not make Bitcoin a ponzi scheme.

Quote
2) The Bitcoin Foundation, or the board representing Bitcoin, is full of illegal activity with dozens of former foundation members resigning from their positions this year. Charlie Shrem, a (former?) foundation member, has been invicted on April 10, 2014 on accusations of "operating an unlicensed money transmitting business, money laundering conspiracy and willfully failing to file suspicious activity reports with banking authorities". He was using Bitcoin to help users of the illegal drug marketplace, Silk Road, buy drugs with Bitcoin, as well as operating an unlicensed money transmitting business, (former) Bitinstant and Brock Pierce (current) foundation member, is an accused Child Molester.

I don't have problem with Charlie Shrem, I believe many other don't have too, even if he goes to jail. Fact Brock Pierce is accused pedophile has not much to do with Bitcoin.

Quote
3) Bitcoin is centralized. It is controlled by the mining pools. For instance, just a few months ago, Ghash.io caused quite a scare in which even Peter Todd, a core developer for Bitcoin, announced that he would be selling 51% of his Bitcoin's due to Ghash.io controlling and approaching 51% of Bitcoin's entire hashrate, which would easily allow them to commit a 51% attack on Bitcoin, thereby killing the currency by basically printing duplicate Bitcoins.

I don't believe that will happen in the future, network hash rate is already much bigger, besides, one owning more than 51% of hashrate does not have much incentive bringing the Bitcoin down.

Quote
4) The most damming evidence of Bitcoin's certain death as of right now(excluding Satoshi's huge 1million Bitcoin stash) however, is Willy. Willy was a bot used on the MtGox exchange from since back in 2012. Willy was illegaly using false fiat funds to buy large quantities of Bitcoin's every hour for days and months on end, which was what led to All of Bitcoin's previous bullruns, as well as dumps when Willy reversed the trend and started selling Bitcoins. Basically, Bitcoin's entire price rise history and dumps, is due not to the traders, not to the news, but to a bot using fake money to buy bitcoins and sell them at a profit. Based upon that information, one can only guess that Bitcoin will never see a $1000+ price per coin again. http://willyreport.wordpress.com/2014/05/25/the-willy-report-proof-of-massive-fraudulent-trading-activity-at-mt-gox-and-how-it-has-affected-the-price-of-bitcoin/

Given how tiny Bitcoin is, compared to world economy, I say 1k USD is ridiculously cheap Bitcoin. See you in few years. Those are not good enough reasons to be that bearish. You're bearish primarily because desperation level is at ATH right now. Do you see all that investments, do you see queues in front of Bitcoin ATMs in next bullrun? Infrastructure is built right to support all of that. You haven't missed the train, but don't miss another one. Bull run will happen 2 years from now, the most.
Pages:
Jump to: