Bitcoin XT? - page 4. | Bitcointalksearch.org

desired_username

hero member

Activity: 886

Merit: 1013

Quote from: ?? on ??

forking is bad, we should all remain on the same chain, either as XT or as core, DEVS GET YOUR FCKIN ASSES TOGETHER AND COME UP WITH A SYNTHESIS!

Do you know what does forking even mean?

Bitcoin cannot evolve without forks.

XT is the same chain, and the trigger mechanism of BIP101 secures that a split is pretty much impossible.

ChetnotAtkins

full member

Activity: 131

Merit: 101

No. I am definitely against this hostile takeover attempt

Ilove-Obama

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: cryptoPrecise on August 18, 2015, 07:48:44 PM

Are you pro Bitcoin XT?

No. down with the speculators who want to create their own fork on behalf of Bitcoin

desired_username

hero member

Activity: 886

Merit: 1013

Quote from: valiz on August 19, 2015, 07:28:46 AM

Quote from: desired_username on August 19, 2015, 07:22:23 AM

XT FTW

Bitcoin arrived at a historic moment. If the blockstream/core cartel wins we can wave goodbye to independent and free bitcoin.

Haha, you're the ones who are forcibly trying to change the protocol Cheesy

. I am certain your propaganda has become ineffective by now.

Meanwhile, remove that extra crap code from the XT cancer. Who knows what discrete backdoors you guys are hiding in there. Keep only the max block size increase to keep a shred of credibility.

Forcibly? It depends on the ecosystem to accept the changes.

The code is open source.

Bitcoin should not depend on any single or group of devs or a company.

The propaganda, the lies and other dirty tactics of the Blockstream/Core-dev group is astonishing though.

desired_username

hero member

Activity: 886

Merit: 1013

Quote from: alani123 on August 19, 2015, 07:30:33 AM

Funny how someone created a fake and indistinguishable XT client. It could effectively cause a premature fork.

That's why 75%+ of hashpower is needed for a trigger.

alani123

legendary

Activity: 2422

Merit: 1451

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Funny how someone created a fake and indistinguishable XT client. It could effectively cause a premature fork.

valiz

sr. member

Activity: 471

Merit: 250

BTC trader

Quote from: desired_username on August 19, 2015, 07:22:23 AM

XT FTW

Bitcoin arrived at a historic moment. If the blockstream/core cartel wins we can wave goodbye to independent and free bitcoin.

Haha, you're the ones who are forcibly trying to change the protocol Cheesy

. I am certain your propaganda has become ineffective by now.

Meanwhile, remove that extra crap code from the XT cancer. Who knows what discrete backdoors you guys are hiding in there. Keep only the max block size increase to keep a shred of credibility.

desired_username

hero member

Activity: 886

Merit: 1013

Quote from: Luqman on August 19, 2015, 01:48:47 AM

We've see the price going down caused by Bitcoin XT Undecided

BS. Check what is bitcoin XT and what is BIP101.

desired_username

hero member

Activity: 886

Merit: 1013

XT FTW

Bitcoin arrived at a historic moment. If the blockstream/core cartel wins we can wave goodbye to independent and free bitcoin.

Envrin

sr. member

Activity: 318

Merit: 251

Quote from: Denker on August 19, 2015, 06:59:18 AM

So I will stay with core for now and hope that the devs will get convinced to increase the blocksize limit at least to 2 or 4MB.

I'm absolutely certain the core devs will devise a consensus based plan to raise the block size when necessary. Right now, there's no immediate need for it, and not for the forseeable future either. When that time comes, I'm absolutely certain the core devs will come to a consensus on a sensible approach to tackle the issue.

This BS about Mike and Gavin shoving it down everyone's throats as if we're in end times is ridiculous, to say the least. Can anyone say "hidden agenda"?

What idiots. They both just totally destroyed any reputation they had within the bitcoin community. They gambled, and they lost. Who's going to listen to them now?

Denker

legendary

Activity: 1442

Merit: 1016

Quote from: Amph on August 19, 2015, 03:22:59 AM

not anymore especially after the thread about how they blacklist ip, i don't like this time of control over users, bitcoin should be synonym of freedom

but i'm still in favor on bigger block at least for now as a soft solution, if we cannot find a better one

Yepp same with me. This is really suspicious. I'm defineately pro bigger blocks but not that way XT is trying to do it.
I'm not a coder but something seems to smell really extremely fishy about it.
So I will stay with core for now and hope that the devs will get convinced to increase the blocksize limit at least to 2 or 4MB.

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

not anymore especially after the thread about how they blacklisted ip, i don't like this time the control over users, bitcoin should be synonym of freedom

but i'm still in favor on bigger block at least for now as a soft solution, if we cannot find a better one

shane

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 503

I really don't care one way or the other
i think forked or not is'nt problem

The real problem is why you should fight?

this is only trol from fake stosi nakamoto

slaveforanunnak1

hero member

Activity: 743

Merit: 502

let me put it simply. FUCK XT.

Luqman

sr. member

Activity: 826

Merit: 263

We've see the price going down caused by Bitcoin XT Undecided

pink fufu bunny

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

Quote from: tadakaluri on August 18, 2015, 10:37:39 PM

The new version, which calls itself Bitcoin XT, would increase the block size to 8 megabytes, which would allow up to 24 transactions to be processed every second. That is still a fraction of the 20,000 or so that VISA can process, but would increase every year, so that bitcoin could continue to grow.

Those who oppose Bitcoin XT say the bigger block size jeopardizes the vision of a decentralized payments system that bitcoin is built on, as the extra computer memory needed would shut out many of the thousands of individual “nodes” that currently power the network.

eya but Ip adressess mmmm na

tadakaluri

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

The new version, which calls itself Bitcoin XT, would increase the block size to 8 megabytes, which would allow up to 24 transactions to be processed every second. That is still a fraction of the 20,000 or so that VISA can process, but would increase every year, so that bitcoin could continue to grow.

Those who oppose Bitcoin XT say the bigger block size jeopardizes the vision of a decentralized payments system that bitcoin is built on, as the extra computer memory needed would shut out many of the thousands of individual “nodes” that currently power the network.

Envrin

sr. member

Activity: 318

Merit: 251

Nope. Mike and Gavin can go F themselves.

What they're attempting to do is absolutely atrocious, and it disgusts me.

Thankfully, it looks like they're going to fall flat on their face. Good. One more win for Bitcoin!

See everyone, this is what happens when you don't keep your ego in check. You get delusional, and come up with ideas like you can just do a hostile takeover of an entire currency.

iCEBREAKER

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1072

Crypto is the separation of Power and State.

Quote from: meono on August 18, 2015, 07:58:40 PM

Be careful, this thread will be locked soon just like this one : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=68655.31220

We have hundreds of votes in that thread.

You can't change your vote in that thread. And the question is not about XT, just 8MB blocks in general.

Plus, it was made long before we knew what Meni Rosenfeld thinks about XT:

Quote

Bitcoin-XT represents a somewhat reckless approach, which in the name of advancement shatters existing structures, fragments the community, and spins the ecosystem into chaos.

Foxpup

legendary

Activity: 4494

Merit: 3178

Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023

I wouldn't care either but for the anti-Tor stuff. That's a big no for me.

Topic: Bitcoin XT? - page 4. (Read 4892 times)