Pages:
Author

Topic: Bitcoin XT has backdoor that may reveal real IP address of its users? (Read 1323 times)

full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
I think a lot of people are changing their minds on XT after the addition of blacklisting code.

Why didn't they just keep the Core code except add the block size upgrade?
Because XT developers are fulfilling government's mission to castrate bitcoin and change it to bring it in line with other payment methods.
Upgrading only block size with XT was never their only purpose. If this will go live we will have 'civil' version of bitcoin...

another FUD? lol
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1005
★Nitrogensports.eu★
I think a lot of people are changing their minds on XT after the addition of blacklisting code.

Why didn't they just keep the Core code except add the block size upgrade?
Because XT developers are fulfilling government's mission to castrate bitcoin and change it to bring it in line with other payment methods.
Upgrading only block size with XT was never their only purpose. If this will go live we will have 'civil' version of bitcoin...
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
So basically don’t use TOR if bitcoin is being DDOSed.

Gotcha.


What dumb workaround is this and how do you even know Bitcoin is being DDOSed in before hand? That just makes 0 sense. Also all the options are set on by default which will mean all noobs dont even know whats going on.
It's about the client being DDosed. It's when the limit of 127 connections is reached(which doesn't happen usually)
Do you guys do any research ever? They same things are clarified over and over again, but seems like even long time members are just reading headlines.

LOL right after you posted, an idiot showed up and did exactly that.....

This forum never ceases to amaze me......
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
So basically don’t use TOR if bitcoin is being DDOSed.

Gotcha.


What dumb workaround is this and how do you even know Bitcoin is being DDOSed in before hand? That just makes 0 sense. Also all the options are set on by default which will mean all noobs dont even know whats going on.
It's about the client being DDosed. It's when the limit of 127 connections is reached(which doesn't happen usually)
Do you guys do any research ever? They same things are clarified over and over again, but seems like even long time members are just reading headlines.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
I think OP should edit the tittle of this thread now. Unless he is just a troll ....  Undecided
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
I think a lot of people are changing their minds on XT after the addition of blacklisting code.

Why didn't they just keep the Core code except add the block size upgrade?
Because BitcoinXT exists since Jan 6, 2014
https://github.com/bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt/commits/master?page=100


Yes, but the block size code was only recently added.
So, what exactly is so hard to understand about BitcoinXT being an alternative client, with additional features?
Should they drop all their features, because people are to dumb to read?

Oh, wait, they already made a version for that:
https://github.com/bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt/tree/only-bigblocks
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1218
Change is in your hands
So basically don’t use TOR if bitcoin is being DDOSed.

Gotcha.


What dumb workaround is this and how do you even know Bitcoin is being DDOSed in before hand? That just makes 0 sense. Also all the options are set on by default which will mean all noobs dont even know whats going on.

Exactly but few greedy people know what will happen at exact time Wink
legendary
Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386
Viva Ut Vivas
I think a lot of people are changing their minds on XT after the addition of blacklisting code.

Why didn't they just keep the Core code except add the block size upgrade?
Because BitcoinXT exists since Jan 6, 2014
https://github.com/bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt/commits/master?page=100


Yes, but the block size code was only recently added.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
I think a lot of people are changing their minds on XT after the addition of blacklisting code.

Why didn't they just keep the Core code except add the block size upgrade?
Because BitcoinXT exists since Jan 6, 2014
https://github.com/bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt/commits/master?page=100
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1047
I think a lot of people are changing their minds on XT after the addition of blacklisting code.

Why didn't they just keep the Core code except add the block size upgrade?

I agree with you completely.

As I have posted before.

""Bitcoin XT" is like getting Thrush in your mouth. This is the result of yeast permitted to overgrow as a result of taking antibiotics to destroy all good and bad bacteria in your body."
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
I think a lot of people are changing their minds on XT after the addition of blacklisting code.

Why didn't they just keep the Core code except add the block size upgrade?
Because the intentions of Hearn aren't pure. Obviously if it was only about the block size, then the XT client would only contain a increased block size limit. However it contains controversial patches that they call "bug fixes", all that were rejected when proposed to Core for being buggy and whatnot.

Also, it can't contain a 'backdoor', since it is open source. People just need to check the source code themselves to verify, which is different from the classic backdoors (usually within finished products).
legendary
Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386
Viva Ut Vivas
I think a lot of people are changing their minds on XT after the addition of blacklisting code.

Why didn't they just keep the Core code except add the block size upgrade?
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
One seriously has to wonder how some characters here still defend XT after all the recent revelations. Why exactly do you use/ like Bitcoin?

I for one view it as a decentralized monetary system, that allows me to store and transfer my wealth globally without any limitations of borders and jurisdictions while retaining complete privacy. If XT is a measure to undermine this fantastic invention then what does it say about the people who support it?

Speak for yourself, some kind of character you got there


Are you sure you dont have a mental issue?


This is what you wrote, isnt it


Already have there been dubious code segments detected in XT's code base. XT is a trojan horse that plans to base it's hostile takeover of Bitcoin on manipulating the notoriously stupid masses.

I for one will dump ALL my Bitcoins immediately on the XT chain, should it ever be tradeable, which will certainly not be without effect. Bitcoin simply cannot be in control of two people with very questionable motives and tactics. It is a tool of the cypherpunks



How are developers responding to this severe limitation of Bitcoin's usage. There are currently 72000 (!) unconfirmed transactions but it seems they don't really want to acknowledge it.

Perhaps set a limit of tx/s to discourage spamming the mempool and block malicious nodes.
full member
Activity: 131
Merit: 100
One seriously has to wonder how some characters here still defend XT after all the recent revelations. Why exactly do you use/ like Bitcoin?

I for one view it as a decentralized monetary system, that allows me to store and transfer my wealth globally without any limitations of borders and jurisdictions while retaining complete privacy. If XT is a measure to undermine this fantastic invention then what does it say about the people who support it?
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1010
In Satoshi I Trust
Zeroday is filling in for TurtleHurricane today.

 Wink - maybe the turtle has two accounts
donator
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
It's not giving up privacy. It’s not like bitcoin will always be under DDOS or there would be a problem. If that happens there are other means to achieve privacy anyway.
How will you comment this finding:
Quote
Connections are made over clearnet even when using a proxy or
onlynet=tor, which leaks connections on the P2P network with the real
location of the node.
source: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010379.html
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
--------------->¿?
So basically don’t use TOR if bitcoin is being DDOSed.

Gotcha.


Your answer is pretty clear. So basically give up privacy.
Gotcha.


It's not giving up privacy. It’s not like bitcoin will always be under DDOS or there would be a problem. If that happens there are other means to achieve privacy anyway.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
the Cat-a-clysm.
Zeroday is filling in for TurtleHurricane today.
legendary
Activity: 868
Merit: 1004
So basically don’t use TOR if bitcoin is being DDOSed.

Gotcha.


What dumb workaround is this and how do you even know Bitcoin is being DDOSed in before hand? That just makes 0 sense. Also all the options are set on by default which will mean all noobs dont even know whats going on.
donator
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
So basically don’t use TOR if bitcoin is being DDOSed.

Gotcha.


Your answer is pretty clear. So basically give up privacy.
Gotcha.
Pages:
Jump to: