Pages:
Author

Topic: bitcoin xt is needed bigger blocks are needed to make bitcoin a success?or not? - page 2. (Read 1065 times)

sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
the Cat-a-clysm.
It doesnt really matter where the block size limit increase is implemented(core or xt), it is needed and it will have to be a fork. You cant have a change like that without forking, again it doesnt matter if its in core or xt.

But it seems the developers of core don't want bigger blocks, so it would be called XT as a result. I like the sound of Core better than XT personally.

So I've heard. Higher block limit is a solution for now. In my opinion of course. Which is why I am running xt. If the core devs decide to go with higher block limit then I'll run core again. I agree it would be better to implement it into core. Obviously it cause confusion for some.
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1183
It doesnt really matter where the block size limit increase is implemented(core or xt), it is needed and it will have to be a fork. You cant have a change like that without forking, again it doesnt matter if its in core or xt.

But it seems the developers of core don't want bigger blocks, so it would be called XT as a result. I like the sound of Core better than XT personally.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
the Cat-a-clysm.
It doesnt really matter where the block size limit increase is implemented(core or xt), it is needed and it will have to be a fork. You cant have a change like that without forking, again it doesnt matter if its in core or xt.
full member
Activity: 406
Merit: 100
bitcoin xt is needed bigger blocks are needed to make bitcoin a success the transactions take to long to process.bitcoin will not go mainstream until there are bigger blocks. the devs should vote and take a decisión bitcoin xt or something that everybody agrees on bitcoin has a lot of potencial as a currency and remittance service bitcoin is great
Pages:
Jump to: