Topic: Bitcoin7.com - Brand new exchange market! - page 4. (Read 28877 times)

I finally found why those transfers were 15 days delayed, it's because of your spam withdrawals...

i can't recommend wiring via sepa from sofia
12 euros fee on my 19 euro withdraw..

Unknown. It's in Dwolla's hands.

So I noticed it said Dwolla / LR withdrawals are halted - any word on the issue or when they will resume?

of course I ususly change 2/3 BTC: sell and move to my bank account.

I don't want to take the risk to leave money on any BTC market. IMHO

Most all that has been covered. Glad it went well for you.

You know I would have no problem trusting them with 100 of your euro anytime!!!   

for transfers bigger than 1100 euro, that 22 euro tax goes cheaper than 2% flat fee

12/22 euro each EUR withdraw to SEPA account.... to much for me I prefer 2% of MtGox also taking USD/EUR change risk..

More sock puppets?

According to the charts b7 hasn't done more than 1 BTC every day since they went live. Or their API for this is broken too

They already had CSS history, CSRF, I wonder when they'll be SQL injected too.

actually i found them very pleasant to deal with

especially for euro-users

It was in my account history, now it's gone. I only copied numbers for internal bookkeeping, didn't make a screenshot I screenshotted Bitcoincharts today, though, who recorded that trade. Will keep you updated on how it is being resolved.

Is this transaction in your account history? Can you post that image?

Sorry, poorly explained. I started with 4 BTC and 0 money. I sold the 4 BTC for lets say 10money. New balance: 0 BTC, 40 money. Next day I check it and balance is suddenly again 4 BTC and 0 money.
No clue about the counterparty as it is an anonymous exchange (like MtGox). All I can say is that they reversed a reasonable trade without notifying me, which is a serious issue for me. How can I trust in dealing with them if they reverse deals from me? That's ridiculous. Never seen anything like this happen at a serious exchange (NYSE, Scoach, MtGox...). Makes me stop trusting those guys.

I don't understand. You sold BTC and received money but they took the BTC? What about the counterparty? What did they receive?

Funny story? Bitcoin 7 cancelled some of my trades. This exchange is supposed to be an instant trade market like MtGox or Britcoin. So, one advantage is that you cannot reverse a trade. But that's exactly what they did. Somebody bought from me well above market, trade got through and got revorded (you can still see it in Bitcoinchart history for instance) they credited me with the money and took my BTC. I lock in today again - I got my BTC back but the money got refunded. WTF?
I'm writing them a mail - but for the time being I can only say - stay away from Bitcoin7!

do you know that anyone dealing with Liberty Reserve is failing AML guidelines even he claims otherwise?

Ah, somehow missed that one (post#27 in this very thread).

I would guess Bruce got a similar offer then. Bad show bitcoin7.

I was not offered a referral bonus.

I was offered money, specifically, to say that bitcoin7 was better than mtgox. 

The text of the email has already been posted.

I originally read that as proactively seeking regulation from the government (like I'm thinking about going to the local tax office to get their stance on Bitcoin before I jump into it), but you are right it could be read that they don't have the necessary paperwork yet either. I guess the main difference is that they didn't rip off Tradehill, or tried to grease luminaries.


If that's aimed at me, maybe that was lost in the sarcasm (because bitcoin7 was pulling the same slur) but I specifically said I don't trust the person/organization, not the country. But you're right, Amirs can't be trusted


Apples and Oranges. A better analogy would be pharmaceutical companies greasing doctors to recommend their brands instead of (cheaper) generic drugs. Bribing someone famous is not quite the same as bribing someone in authority, or bribing the news anchor. Someone you don't just want to, but *have* to trust, or expect to be impartial, or at least upfront about it.


Didn't sound like he was offered a sponsor deal, although Bruce obviously isn't impartial here. Still, he was upfront about the Tradehill sponsoring on the show, nothing wrong with that. The confusion about him being the proprietor was started by someone possibly referring to Jered as 'very trusted member of the community', and someone else combined the OP with that. Bruce did set the record straight fairly quickly (it's hard to follow everything here as it is, I'm sure he's busy enough already).


That sounds quite benign (basically same deal as Tradehill for the referrals) but doesn't mention money, it should be interesting whether Bruce (and Jeff Garzik) got the same message.

My apologies jerfelix, I wasn't directing that towards you......it was generally speaking.