@keepinquiet please calm down, there is nothing to be nervous about
We are not using SHA1 anywhere on site. We are using only SHA256.
BULLSHITSha256 does not result in a 40 character hash. But please, tell me I'm wrong. Obviously.
Quincunx
We salted server seed of quincunx and will show it after X days to validate all previous bets. (hacker above used this to gain advantage, so its quick fix which could lead you to wrong assumptions)
Same systems is used on luckybit.
You can't validate quincunx currently, you will be able after couple days. Nothing to hide here.
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA.
Oh. My. God.
Please, pick me up off the floor.
"We are provably fair. Trust us. You can validate it "in a few days". In the meantime, bet all you want, you can trust us. Oh, and by the way, ignore all the contradictory 'this is how you verify' on the website, because in a forum thread we posted the real method. Which, you know, you can use in "a few days"".
Poker
About poker, initial deck is just wrapped to not exceed set amount of pixels. You can read it from left to right and again from left to right.
Simple as that, if it causing trouble we will change initial deck to one full line.
Oh, ok, left to right. Got it. You know, because 'left to right and right to left' clears it all up and it's absolutely verifiable.
Again, nevermind that pesky contradicting information which I VERY CLEARLY pointed out and you VERY OBVIOUSLY decided to not address.
And of course, it's all verified with 40 character SHA256 hashes. I dont know why I havent been using them myself, they save so much space.
I've never seen such a horribly poor setup before.
We know its not described good, but it works. You just need to ask first, we will tell you how and where.
We agree that it need polishing to be understandable easier. Its 1-st day of website.
So to sum this up, we will explain you how to verify games, it will be easier and faster on PM.
We hope you will cooperate and corrent your harsh opinion.
update:
just put @rollinbones on ignore list, since there is nothing more to tell here, he abused our design flawed quincunx and we reacted to this. Couple users made withdraws with starting 100 satoshis, but they won it without hacking.
@keepinquiet we are eager to contact you and explain our provably fair system, please respond to our PM
A) It does NOT work
B) NO ONE should have to ask on an unrelated forum.
C) You do not fix GLARING problems with the CORE of your system "later" after you launch and people lose money.
and D) I will under no circumstances have a private discussion with you. You are either moronic scammers trying to talk your way out of it, or vastly underqualified amateur site operators who are going to lose a LOT of people's money.
I am completely unsurprised by your ignoring of rollingbones. You make a claim there was a hack, which, if it would by some MIRACLE work like you said (because, again, your hashes are not hashes and could not possibly ever actually validate), you'd have no proof whatsoever, other than "oh shit we're losing money!" that anyone used it against you.
Based on the screenshot above, yes, it's quite clear that he was abusing the shit out of it. Very obviously changing the seed so that he never lost and just kept winning.
I'm still leaning on scammer bullshit. No legitimate site operator would need or want to discuss something this important over PMs and leave everyone else reading this to wonder. No, sorry, I won't be entertaining those PMs.
Rollingbones, send me a PM. I'd like to know exactly what happened.