Emailed them about three days ago about their minimum payout for BCH because I have small miners. I haven't heard anything back. Anyone know what it is?
While you're at it, you should get them to fix this thread regularly to have the correct PPS, or completely remove the 120% lie in the thread title. 
Topic: Bitcoin.com Pool, PPS - page 2. (Read 18263 times)
Emailed them about three days ago about their minimum payout for BCH because I have small miners. I haven't heard anything back. Anyone know what it is?
hashrate seems stable. but I am not sure if everyone getting Estimated 24hr revenue as it is written? any thoughts ? also it is possible to switch pps to pplns which is best for mining. gonna test this pool for few days then switch maybe to BTC.com more profits with BCC?
Bitcoin.com pool is not perform stability about hashrates,not using max. hashrate of the device. I'm just back to ViaBTC for this reason.
What do you mean by this?
Hi,
how do you know which pool server you connected to?
I saw in the dashboard, there's only 1 url server. but when you go to pool stas page and scroll down, they seem to have us, eu, cn, sg.
how do I know which one we are connected to or how do we choose?
Thanks.
how do you know which pool server you connected to?
I saw in the dashboard, there's only 1 url server. but when you go to pool stas page and scroll down, they seem to have us, eu, cn, sg.
how do I know which one we are connected to or how do we choose?
Thanks.
hashrate seems stable. but I am not sure if everyone getting Estimated 24hr revenue as it is written? any thoughts ? also it is possible to switch pps to pplns which is best for mining. gonna test this pool for few days then switch maybe to BTC.com more profits with BCC?
Bitcoin.com pool is not perform stability about hashrates,not using max. hashrate of the device. I'm just back to ViaBTC for this reason.
What is Bitcoin Cash minimum payout?
They just recently dropped back down to 105%. It has fluctuated a few times in the last couple of months, even to the point of having 0% bonus.
With little or no notice.
They just recently dropped back down to 105%. It has fluctuated a few times in the last couple of months, even to the point of having 0% bonus.
Could not tell you. I left when it stopped being 120%.
Which happened very quietly.
At Viabtc now. They switch between BTC and BCH depending on profitability.
Past 24 hrs. BCH has been 169% more profitable than BTC.
EDIT: The Pool has found 44 blocks in the past 6 hours.
I used Viabtc for a while. I am back to bitcoin.com. They are at 110% PPS, and they have an auto URL that switches between BCH and BTC.Which happened very quietly.
At Viabtc now. They switch between BTC and BCH depending on profitability.
Past 24 hrs. BCH has been 169% more profitable than BTC.
EDIT: The Pool has found 44 blocks in the past 6 hours.
You are currently advertising a falsehood - it's not 120%
Could not tell you. I left when it stopped being 120%.
Which happened very quietly.
At Viabtc now. They switch between BTC and BCH depending on profitability.
Past 24 hrs. BCH has been 169% more profitable than BTC.
EDIT: The Pool has found 44 blocks in the past 6 hours.
I used Viabtc for a while. I am back to bitcoin.com. They are at 110% PPS, and they have an auto URL that switches between BCH and BTC.Which happened very quietly.
At Viabtc now. They switch between BTC and BCH depending on profitability.
Past 24 hrs. BCH has been 169% more profitable than BTC.
EDIT: The Pool has found 44 blocks in the past 6 hours.
I have found you have to move around as conditions change. No one pool is the best all the time. At least not from a profitability standpoint.
hashrate seems stable. but I am not sure if everyone getting Estimated 24hr revenue as it is written? any thoughts ? also it is possible to switch pps to pplns which is best for mining. gonna test this pool for few days then switch maybe to BTC.com more profits with BCC?
Could not tell you. I left when it stopped being 120%.
Which happened very quietly.
At Viabtc now. They switch between BTC and BCH depending on profitability.
Past 24 hrs. BCH has been 169% more profitable than BTC.
EDIT: The Pool has found 44 blocks in the past 6 hours.
I used Viabtc for a while. I am back to bitcoin.com. They are at 110% PPS, and they have an auto URL that switches between BCH and BTC. Which happened very quietly.
At Viabtc now. They switch between BTC and BCH depending on profitability.
Past 24 hrs. BCH has been 169% more profitable than BTC.
EDIT: The Pool has found 44 blocks in the past 6 hours.
Could not tell you. I left when it stopped being 120%.
Which happened very quietly.
At Viabtc now. They switch between BTC and BCH depending on profitability.
Past 24 hrs. BCH has been 169% more profitable than BTC.
EDIT: The Pool has found 44 blocks in the past 6 hours.
Which happened very quietly.
At Viabtc now. They switch between BTC and BCH depending on profitability.
Past 24 hrs. BCH has been 169% more profitable than BTC.
EDIT: The Pool has found 44 blocks in the past 6 hours.
I was struggling to find BCH mining pool and stopped at bitcoin.com.
Everything was okay until 2 days ago my earning in BCH halved. My hashrate remains steady. I don't ntice any significant raise in difficulty. Is something wrong with the pool?
Everything was okay until 2 days ago my earning in BCH halved. My hashrate remains steady. I don't ntice any significant raise in difficulty. Is something wrong with the pool?
Probably competing with BTC.Com's 119% PPS-like system. I'm staying on Kano and smaller pools but nice to see competition in the pool side of things.
Kano runs a fine pool, but I wouldn't go as far as saying that the bitcoin.com pool is "large". It's under 100 PH.
Probably competing with BTC.Com's 119% PPS-like system. I'm staying on Kano and smaller pools but nice to see competition in the pool side of things.
I got the message below last night. Apparently the bitcoin.com pool is increasing it's payout to 120% which is 10% more than they were paying.
Bitcoin.com Pool Now Pays a 120% Block Reward
When we first launched pool.bitcoin.com network fees were averaging about 10% on top of the block reward, so we decided to pay 110% in an effort to attract more miners to our pool to help resolve the scaling debate.
Today the network congestion is even worse, so we have increased our block reward to 120% effective immediately.
This applies to all private miners on our pool, and all cloud mining customers.
Everyone will now receive 120% of the block reward!
We already paid significantly more than other pools, and now we pay even more, so tell your friends!
Bitcoin.com Pool Now Pays a 120% Block Reward
When we first launched pool.bitcoin.com network fees were averaging about 10% on top of the block reward, so we decided to pay 110% in an effort to attract more miners to our pool to help resolve the scaling debate.
Today the network congestion is even worse, so we have increased our block reward to 120% effective immediately.
This applies to all private miners on our pool, and all cloud mining customers.
Everyone will now receive 120% of the block reward!
We already paid significantly more than other pools, and now we pay even more, so tell your friends!
https://news.bitcoin.com/bitcoin-coms-cloud-mining-allowing-anyone-mine-bitcoin/
Their own press release states that they are partnered with North Americas largest bitcoin mine to provide hash rate including posting pictures of the main bitcoin.com developer in said mine.
If it were up to me, I'd contact that North America farm to skip the middleman
Nevertheless, transparency is a good thing and it could be an option to consider then! And as icon73 pointed out - if they do guarantee hash rate, any risks are at their own cost. As I understand, customer is expected to receive cloud mining contract payouts regardless if the miners providing this hash rate stay up or down.
Green light so far. But since it's a "fresh out the bakery oven" product, it makes sense to try out with small amounts first.
PS. While I can say that pointing your ASIC miners to their pool is highly likely *safe*, I can not vouch for any of their cloud mining contracts today as it's unclear from where the hash rate comes from. If they re-sell hash rate bought from somebody else, they are just the middlemen, and you may end up overpaying. In complex ownership structures, it's also difficult to have a clear picture of the asset at hand - who owns what, who bears responsibility to provide support, is the support offered by bitcoin.com or someone else, and if so, does bitcoin.com pool open support tickets to another entity, possibly resulting in very lengthy support delivery times? I have no answers to any of that.
https://news.bitcoin.com/bitcoin-coms-cloud-mining-allowing-anyone-mine-bitcoin/
Their own press release states that they are partnered with North Americas largest bitcoin mine to provide hash rate including posting pictures of the main bitcoin.com developer in said mine.
In complex ownership structures, it's also difficult to have a clear picture of the asset at hand - who owns what, who bears responsibility to provide support, is the support offered by bitcoin.com or someone else, and if so, does bitcoin.com pool open support tickets to another entity, possibly resulting in very lengthy support delivery times? I have no answers to any of that.
If one takes time to read the agreement, the pool guarantees the hashrate. So in my case for example I bought 1Th/s. It's a solid one TH line, and I get the PPS payment associated with that line.
So I am not worried about complex ownership, or time to restore.
Jump to: