Bitcoin/Crypto Carbon Tax? - page 2.

davis196

hero member

Activity: 3150

Merit: 937

Quote from: pooya87 on March 15, 2021, 12:51:03 AM

From Wikipedia:

Quote

A carbon tax is a tax levied on the carbon content of goods and services, predominantly in the transport and energy sectors.

Bitcoin does NOT have any carbon content, it does NOT burn any carbon-based fuels, it does NOT emit any kind of pollution at all. Bitcoin is a user of the electricity that is provided by the electric companies. If a miner is supposed to pay carbon tax then you too should also pay it for your fridge, TV,... basically any time you use electricity!

All the Bitcoin haters,who say that BTC mining is polluting the environment should read your post. Grin

BTC mining isn't polluting anything.It just consumes electricity that might be produced by burning coal.
What if BTC miners are consuming electricity produced by Nuclear power plants?Such electricity is considered clean and the nuclear power plants aren't paying carbon tax.
All the anti-Bitcoin mining propaganda is just pure BS.

pooya87

legendary

Activity: 3472

Merit: 10611

From Wikipedia:

Quote

A carbon tax is a tax levied on the carbon content of goods and services, predominantly in the transport and energy sectors.

Bitcoin does NOT have any carbon content, it does NOT burn any carbon-based fuels, it does NOT emit any kind of pollution at all. Bitcoin is a user of the electricity that is provided by the electric companies. If a miner is supposed to pay carbon tax then you too should also pay it for your fridge, TV,... basically any time you use electricity!

odolvlobo

legendary

Activity: 4466

Merit: 3391

Placing a carbon tax on Bitcoin mining would not affect Bitcoin in the slightest.

It would simply lower the difficulty. However, an unintended consequence might be the migration of mining to countries that use more fossil fuels for energy generation. It would also create a new class of criminals -- those that don't pay the tax and mine Bitcoin at a huge financial advantage.

More broadly, I believe that these attacks are misdirected. The real issue is not Bitcoin's consumption of energy, but instead it is the generation of energy by burning fossil fuels. If fossil fuels were not used to generate energy, then this discussion would be moot.

If we determine that the merit of Bitcoin is not worthy of the energy that it uses, then should we not also evaluate the merit of other energy-consuming activities? What about watching TikTok videos? Should we ban those? They arguably have little merit, yet so much energy is expended on their distribution and viewing. What else can we prohibit based on its merit vs. energy consumption? What about NASCAR?

ranochigo

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 4418

Crypto Swap Exchange

Mining will never end; 2140 is simply the year for which the block rewards diminishes below 1 satoshi. I highly doubt that it is feasible to try to price the environmental impacts fairly or is it easy to impose the tax on the users themselves. It is perfectly feasible to be implementing it for miners but it would probably only affect the numbers of miners and their profit margin. Whether the price would drop would be an entirely different issues that isn't exactly affected by this; difficulty and the network hashrate could be affected if this ever happens.

Vishnu.Reang

sr. member

Activity: 1988

Merit: 453

Quote from: ModelT on March 14, 2021, 07:07:06 AM

Who thinks that multiple countries will end up imposing a carbon tax on crytocurrency owners & miners? If this is done, what would happen to the price of BTC? Do you think bitcoin would make changes to adapt (like ending mining sooner than 2140)? Would Bitcoin be secure with fewer miners?

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-01-26/is-bitcoin-mining-worth-the-environmental-cost

Ridiculous. They can't impose carbon tax specific to a certain subgroup. If they want to impose it, then it will be implemented for everyone who uses electricity from the national grid. As per the latest stats, Bitcoin mining is consuming only 0.6% of the global electricity generation. So what about the 99.4%? Do they think that this group of 99.4% solely uses the electricity for productive purposes?

rhomelmabini

hero member

Activity: 2030

Merit: 578

No God or Kings, only BITCOIN.

Quote from: ModelT on March 14, 2021, 07:07:06 AM

Who thinks that multiple countries will end up imposing a carbon tax on crytocurrency owners & miners? If this is done, what would happen to the price of BTC? Do you think bitcoin would make changes to adapt (like ending mining sooner than 2140)? Would Bitcoin be secure with fewer miners?

I think that's not surprising if we end up within more and more regulation even with carbon tax on mining btc. I don't think price will just settle much less considering it would be taxed, that's not realistic in its sense if BTC would get more cheaper here, though we may see some declines I think in the long run mining will still be a business.

ModelT

jr. member

Activity: 35

Merit: 24

Good points so far.

While I tend to favor less government intervention rather than more, I do feel one of the roles of government is to help factor in external costs into prices in cases where free market prices do not include these costs. Pollution is often times an external cost that is not included in free market price (and is not limited to BTC, as many have pointed out).

One reason I suggest that governments might place carbon taxes on owners, and not just miners, is they may view this as a way to get around jurisductional reach issues.

dkbit98

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 7064

Carbon and all other taxes are incredibly dirty business and not Bitcoin like this article suggests, but I would not be surprised if countries invent some new Bitcoin tax, because they are best for creating new taxes.
What if country like France is using nuclear plants for creating electric energy and same energy is used for mining bitcoin?
I don't see that Bitcoin is creating so much pollution, and we can argue that more CO2 is probably created in production of food like cheese, wine and alcohol and I don't see anyone comparing that with bitcoin yet, but there are plans to ban use of meat.

NeuroticFish

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 6382

Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!

Quote from: ModelT on March 14, 2021, 07:07:06 AM

Who thinks that multiple countries will end up imposing a carbon tax on crytocurrency owners & miners? If this is done, what would happen to the price of BTC? Do you think bitcoin would make changes to adapt (like ending mining sooner than 2140)?

Electric car owners use electricity. Do they pay for the carbon taxes? No, they get benefits for using "clean energy".
Would bitcoin miners have to pay carbon taxes for their consumption? Isn't it still electricity?
Electric companies should be (and are!) required to pay for their carbon footprint and that should translate into the price of the electricity. Higher price for electricity may make mining no longer profitable there and get relocated.
This is the correct and realistic path. Then you'll see how many miners actually work with cleaner energy than you use.

On the other hand, if you ask about carbon tax for crypto owners it means that you have no idea what you are talking about and you should read more before opening your mouth.

Quote from: ModelT on March 14, 2021, 07:07:06 AM

Would Bitcoin be secure with fewer miners?

Yes. I don't know the numbers, but it would clearly be still secure even with less miners. But as long as it's profitable, I don't see them give up.

joniboini

legendary

Activity: 2170

Merit: 1789

Why would the community decide that we need to end mining sooner than 2140 just because there is a tax on their profits? I doubt there's any change in the protocol. Some might stop or pause their mining activities, the hash rate might drop but even if that's the case the network is still strong enough to resist 51% attack and so on. It's not like their profit will suddenly turn into -50%. IMO the majority might move from one place to another, find a new energy source to reduce the mining cost to keep increase their profits, and so on.

ModelT

jr. member

Activity: 35

Merit: 24

Who thinks that multiple countries will end up imposing a carbon tax on crytocurrency owners & miners? If this is done, what would happen to the price of BTC? Do you think bitcoin would make changes to adapt (like ending mining sooner than 2140)? Would Bitcoin be secure with fewer miners?

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-01-26/is-bitcoin-mining-worth-the-environmental-cost

Topic: Bitcoin/Crypto Carbon Tax? - page 2. (Read 273 times)