Topic: BitcoinEXpress lies he didn&#039;t write Microcash articles on RipoffReport (Read 3627 times)

Quote from: chrisrico on June 05, 2012, 03:57:47 PM

When the "founders" of a currency have to hide behind aliases, it is the sign of a scam.

Fixed that for you.

Quote from: k9quaint on June 05, 2012, 07:49:12 PM

Gavin Andresen and the other active developers are not pseudonyms.

You originally said "founders", which Gavin is not, and not "active developers".

You made a leap of logic. If S Nakamoto is a pseudonym and we don't know who he is, we cannot be certain that he/she was not one of the current active developers. You also assume that S Nakamoto was a single entity instead of a group of people publishing under a pseudonym. But this is just rehashing an old conversation. Bitcoin's genesis is a bit bizarre and leaves something to be desired grant you. If Bitcoin was proprietary source, with no white paper, with developers hiding behind aliases and phony registrar details I would not be a proponent of it.

You seem to be jumping through some awfully tiny hoops in order to defend something you said which is inaccurate...

I see that you have run out of argument and finally agree with me. Speaking of jumping through tiny hoops, when are you going to stop hopping through them?

P.S. I put "founders" in quotes. What do the quotes around it signify?

chrisrico

hero member

Activity: 496

Merit: 500

Quote from: chrisrico on June 05, 2012, 03:57:47 PM

Quote from: chrisrico on June 05, 2012, 03:57:47 PM

When the "founders" of a currency have to hide behind aliases, it is the sign of a scam.

Fixed that for you.

Quote from: chrisrico on June 05, 2012, 03:57:47 PM

Gavin Andresen and the other active developers are not pseudonyms.

You originally said "founders", which Gavin is not, and not "active developers".

You made a leap of logic. If S Nakamoto is a pseudonym and we don't know who he is, we cannot be certain that he/she was not one of the current active developers. You also assume that S Nakamoto was a single entity instead of a group of people publishing under a pseudonym. But this is just rehashing an old conversation. Bitcoin's genesis is a bit bizarre and leaves something to be desired grant you. If Bitcoin was proprietary source, with no white paper, with developers hiding behind aliases and phony registrar details I would not be a proponent of it.

You seem to be jumping through some awfully tiny hoops in order to defend something you said which is inaccurate...

k9quaint

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

Quote from: chrisrico on June 05, 2012, 03:57:47 PM

When the "founders" of a currency have to hide behind aliases, it is the sign of a scam.

Fixed that for you.

Gavin Andresen and the other active developers are not pseudonyms.

You originally said "founders", which Gavin is not, and not "active developers".

You made a leap of logic. If S Nakamoto is a pseudonym and we don't know who he is, we cannot be certain that he/she was not one of the current active developers. You also assume that S Nakamoto was a single entity instead of a group of people publishing under a pseudonym. But this is just rehashing an old conversation. Bitcoin's genesis is a bit bizarre and leaves something to be desired grant you. If Bitcoin was proprietary source, with no white paper, with developers hiding behind aliases and phony registrar details I would not be a proponent of it.

chrisrico

hero member

Activity: 496

Merit: 500

When the "founders" of a currency have to hide behind aliases, it is the sign of a scam.

Quote from: LoWang on May 27, 2012, 04:45:46 PM

Gavin Andresen and the other active developers are not pseudonyms.

You originally said "founders", which Gavin is not, and not "active developers".

k9quaint

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

Quote from: chrisrico on May 20, 2012, 05:13:48 AM

Quote from: chrisrico on May 20, 2012, 05:13:48 AM

When the "founders" of a currency have to hide behind aliases, it is the sign of a scam.

You mean like "Satoshi Nakamoto"? Grin

Oh yes it seems to be pseudonym as well Wink

Gavin Andresen and the other active developers are not pseudonyms.
We have been over this already, pay attention. Oh wait, SoiledCoin is all about making the same mistakes over and over.

Speaking of the coin du filth, where is it?

LoWang

full member

Activity: 147

Merit: 100

Quote from: notyep on May 26, 2012, 12:32:21 PM

When the "founders" of a currency have to hide behind aliases, it is the sign of a scam.

You mean like "Satoshi Nakamoto"? Grin

Oh yes it seems to be pseudonym as well Wink

bulanula

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: ?? on ??

I swear you add no value to this forum. At least I'm asking for some validity and light to be shed on the shit known as SC/MC. All you do is put up retarded pictures claiming how stupid us "bitcoin-trolls" are.

I disagree... I only amplify how one dimensional you specific crew of MC$ haters really are which is very easy to showcase. *winks*

Notyep, which is Peyton backwards is starting to sound a whole lot like Smoothie LOL
[/quote]

Hey, I thought I was smoothie Huh

Get your facts straight !

notyep

member

Activity: 76

Merit: 10

Quote from: Cosbycoin on May 25, 2012, 07:24:08 PM

Quote from: notyep on May 25, 2012, 07:16:38 PM

Quote from: notyep on May 25, 2012, 07:16:38 PM

Solidcoin 1.0 was a cliff, solidcoin 2.0 was a blocker at the edge of that cliff, microcash may be the builder they need to get out of here... but oh, its building in the wrong direction, over the top of solidcoin 2.0, over the cliff, going to be a messy fall when it runs out of steps for a shitload of lemmings

"You bitcoin bastards simply can't get enough...."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpPQBL7PNhs&feature=youtube_gdata_player

L.M.A.O.

I swear you add no value to this forum. At least I'm asking for some validity and light to be shed on the shit known as SC/MC. All you do is put up retarded pictures claiming how stupid us "bitcoin-trolls" are.

I disagree... I only amplify how one dimensional you specific crew of MC$ haters really are which is very easy to showcase. *winks*

drakahn

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

Quote from: notyep on May 25, 2012, 07:16:38 PM

Solidcoin 1.0 was a cliff, solidcoin 2.0 was a blocker at the edge of that cliff, microcash may be the builder they need to get out of here... but oh, its building in the wrong direction, over the top of solidcoin 2.0, over the cliff, going to be a messy fall when it runs out of steps for a shitload of lemmings

"You bitcoin bastards simply can't get enough...."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpPQBL7PNhs&feature=youtube_gdata_player

L.M.A.O.

And its Lemming number one

Cosbycoin

hero member

Activity: 980

Merit: 506

Solidcoin 1.0 was a cliff, solidcoin 2.0 was a blocker at the edge of that cliff, microcash may be the builder they need to get out of here... but oh, its building in the wrong direction, over the top of solidcoin 2.0, over the cliff, going to be a messy fall when it runs out of steps for a shitload of lemmings

"You bitcoin bastards simply can't get enough...."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpPQBL7PNhs&feature=youtube_gdata_player

L.M.A.O.

I swear you add no value to this forum. At least I'm asking for some validity and light to be shed on the shit known as SC/MC. All you do is put up retarded pictures claiming how stupid us "bitcoin-trolls" are.

notyep

member

Activity: 76

Merit: 10