If that ever happens than is time to but some bitcoins.
I don't think we will see that happen agian.
Topic: Bitcoins going down they said - page 2. (Read 1616 times)
they were saying that because they wanted that some fish dump his coin, and apparently they succeed in this, at least partially
i would not be surprise if a portion of those dump that happened prior the 300 mark, were because of all the troll that were advocating the death of bitcoin here...
i would not be surprise if a portion of those dump that happened prior the 300 mark, were because of all the troll that were advocating the death of bitcoin here...
Who are they? Do you just want to talk down bitcoin. Without source and evidence, people will not treat that seriously.
You will find plenty of evidence of double digits predictions all over the chart guys threads during last winter. Here is one prediction by a chart guy called RyNinDaCleM. They were predicting $80 coins, and sometimes $50 coins last winter, but they cheapest they went to was $150.
it's charts like this that lead me to hesitate on calling this a top though, how do you see this developing if your model was invalidated and the bull run were to continue?
https://www.tradingview.com/v/nOHd1wTW/
https://www.tradingview.com/v/nOHd1wTW/
The analysis given is a local count. it may fit within the bigger picture in many ways including that count. Im not sure about that one though, I dont think falling wedges may occur in wave position A.
Yes, you can have a leading diagonal in wave-A however, it will be just like a wave-1 LD in that it will have 5 clear, impulsive waves. Takes form of 5-3-5-3-5 and has overlap of 4-1. It fulfills two of those requirements, but not the impulsive one. If it were a LD, the B would hit 50% of the fall from 1163-152 in very short order and the C will very likely end up in the double digits. I do not subscribe to a LD formation, personally, but that's not to say it's not a complex correction taking the basic shape of a diagonal.
I personally would think a slow and steady growth like we've had the past few weeks would be very bullish?
Is that a statement or a question?
Everyone has their own predictions. Double digits seems unreal to me. They were obviously wrong. I don't let "them" interfere with how I'm handling my bitcoins though.
I trust my own instincts, even if it did go down to double digits, I would've held on to my bitcoins and probably bought some more.
I trust my own instincts, even if it did go down to double digits, I would've held on to my bitcoins and probably bought some more.
double digits they said..
"They" say a lot of things. "We" all know that we need to do our own due diligence before making investments, and that we have to take responsibility for our own actions.
They just had a job to do getting people shook so they could accumulate more for now. Also you obviously had the butthurts who hoped it went to double digits but they're clearly wrong. Saying that I am thankful to them for their hard work and all the doom threads. Bitcoin has awoken and I for one am glad I held. 2016 will be the bubble that dwarfs the other before.
EDIT:: To answer/quote the above. He is basically saying 'they' was wrong and he is not beating on bitcoin. Quite the opposite. They are the trolls that was making doom threads everyday.
Who are they? Do you just want to talk down bitcoin. Without source and evidence, people will not treat that seriously.
EDIT:: To answer/quote the above. He is basically saying 'they' was wrong and he is not beating on bitcoin. Quite the opposite. They are the trolls that was making doom threads everyday.
ok , i know ,thank you . i think i should buy more bitcoins now .
double digits they said..
Jump to: