The point to me is something he just glosses over and that is that there is not an underlying market supporting the bitcoin price. Basically the whole bitcoin market is speculators with no real demand for coins other than drugs and gamblers and they dont need enough coins to justify the price. I dont really care about the other aspects of the artical.
It is like the housing market and the feds bond buying, The real market is not there for homes so they have to create artificial scarcity and use fed bond buying to prop up the price.
Reality will set in at some point, but i guess the saying goes the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent.
You say "reality will set in at some point." Well, what point will that be exactly?
You think bitcoin miners who have owned bitcoins for years and seen the price go from <$1 to <$265 are going to "wake up" and sell their coins and walk away?
Or perhaps the growing ecosystem fueled by tens of millions of Venture Capital dollars being invested in bitcoin based companies will suddenly just dry up and vanish in the wind?
Or how about the continual increase of global bitcoin transactions in "legal" sectors fueled by companies like Bitpay?
Or is it just the idea that a world ever more influenced, created and led by technology will never give birth to a true technology based currency that will find its way into the global economy in some permanent way?
But, instead you compare a 4 year old Bitcoin market to a 100+ year old bond market and a 200+ year old real estate market?
Do you ever consider that Bitcoin's current "inflated" price might just be the soil it needs to grow an underlying market, by igniting the press, global interest and potential monetary gain to inspire the very investment any currency needs to become a conscious, and ultimately, useful part of society?
I won't argue that Bitcoin's are currently heavily valued in speculation. Or that the US dollar is dying soon (or in our grandchildren's lifetimes). However, as long as the price of Bitcoin is enticing enough for you to be trading it for "fat stacks," it's also attractive enough to be creating an economic infrastructure and ecosystem for true economic utility.