Pages:
Author

Topic: Bitcoin's volatility is a non-issue - page 10. (Read 2115 times)

jr. member
Activity: 667
Merit: 1
May 14, 2018, 05:16:27 PM
#28
Volatility is common to all trading instruments, I dont think  that should be an isolated issue to be hammered on bitcoin alone. Every investment has it's risk and every investor should know this as well as know why they are investing into it. The value doesn't depreciate even with volatility so investors should jot be bothered about it.
member
Activity: 132
Merit: 12
May 14, 2018, 04:35:43 PM
#27

  • Each Bitcoin transaction is a zero-sum game -- one party benefits to the same extent that the other does not benefit. So one party is guaranteed always to be fine with the volatility. And neither party knows for sure (or at all) who that beneficiary will be.

You don't think this is a big issue at all? A small business with razor thin margins could very easily lose money and lose the capability to pay their suppliers in case of a slide. That alone makes accepting it unnecessarily risky and very far from ideal. It's fine peer-to-peer, but when you have an obligation to pay and a business to run, it's a significant variable you could just do away with. They could use a payment processor to mitigate the risks, but that also defeats the purpose.

Volatility could very well be a deal breaker in a few scenarios. While I acknowledge that it gets blown out of proportion here and there, it's certainly not a non-issue. If it works for you, and it does for most of us, great. That doesn't mean it will work for everyone else though. Volatility is a problem that can presumably be solved by time and adoption, and shouldn't be swept under the rug.

You make good points about merchants with razor-thin margins -- which is the condition of a lot of merchants, probably most by far. Those merchants would not be able to afford the risk of holding the bitcoins and so would miss out on any appreciation in their value after a sale. Clearly such businesses would only put a Bitcoin logo on their door if they thought it would bring in more business. It it was too much hassle too soon without benefit they would take the decals off.  I'm not sure what you mean that use of a payment processor defeats the purpose. The purpose is to increase sales and profits. If passing their bitcoins instantly through Coinbase for transfer to their bank account still results in enough more money to make the effort worthwhile, they would do it. I've made the point in other posts here that merchants might increase the feasibility of bitcoins by stipulating that there are absolutely no returns on bitcoin sales -- all sales final, and it would say so on the receipt. Also, bitcoin pricing could be highly flexible -- when the BTC price is rising, prices for BTC sales could be lower than the cash/credit-card price. When the BTC price is falling, such prices would be higher, maybe a lot higher -- ruthless pawn-shop rates.

I suspect that such merchants will eventually realize that, while BTC has volatility risk, it also has benefits that might be of unique value to them, more so than a chain or big box.
member
Activity: 132
Merit: 12
May 14, 2018, 04:09:06 PM
#26

I basically like your arguments and agree with them. I agree that high volatility is a non-issue in itself. Nevertheless you are missing one important aspect: transaction fees. They are low but whenever the volatility gets high, they get insanely high. And I think that the biggest issue currently is high transaction fees in times of large volatility and it is in fact a blocker for bitcoin being used as a currency.

Good point, but I think the Lightening Network should eventually resolve the fee problem, and as I understand it fees are already a lot lower than they were during the last feeding frenzy. Eventually SegWit will become the dominant address format, helping to keep fees under control. But also, if Bitcoin fees do go sky high, more and more people will be willing to use Ether or Bitcoin Cash or Litecoin instead. Excessive Bitcoin fees will eventually go away completely because fewer and fewer people will be willing to pay them and will know how not to.

hero member
Activity: 2786
Merit: 657
Want top-notch marketing for your project, Hire me
May 14, 2018, 11:04:15 AM
#25
Like you said OP the bitcoin volatility in nature is not an issue cause bitcoin volatility always work to the pumping is price aspect but the FUD which was said or posted online and the GOX flooding the market are the cause of the dumb in prize. Therefore, bitcoin is a good store of value.
member
Activity: 132
Merit: 12
May 14, 2018, 10:55:04 AM
#24
I like Uberse's style. He stealthily included Ethereum in the article in a sentence that says both BTC and ETH are good stores of value lol.

Ethereum is not a good store of value because what it promises to deliver will not be delivered. Lets watch how long they can keep the ongoing scam last.

I just included Ethereum because it is a leading crypto, nothing stealthy intended. I should add that I bought Ethers during their presale and have been hodling ever since. If it's a scam it's an incredibly good one. But it is not a scam.
member
Activity: 132
Merit: 12
May 14, 2018, 10:52:41 AM
#23

If bitcoin will be very expensive, a sharp drop in it with normal volatility, if it coincides with negative information, can lead to panic that will work as a domino effect and bitcoin may depreciate in one or several days. Is this not worthy of attention and is not a problem related to volatility?

But how did it get expensive in the first place? There was positive information which led to FOMA and worked as a domino effect and bitcoin appreciated in one or several days. This is indeed worthy of attention. Whether it is a problem in this case depends on whether you held on or sold before the appreciation. But it is my point that the problem is actually just one of perception. If you bought a bitcoin and transferred it for a good or service before the spike, that spike has not really hurt you. It may irritate you, but you paid a price for it that you decided was a good price for your immediate purposes at that time.
member
Activity: 392
Merit: 39
May 14, 2018, 03:56:20 AM
#22


I basically like your arguments and agree with them. I agree that high volatility is a non-issue in itself. Nevertheless you are missing one important aspect: transaction fees. They are low but whenever the volatility gets high, they get insanely high. And I think that the biggest issue currently is high transaction fees in times of large volatility and it is in fact a blocker for bitcoin being used as a currency.
jr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 8
May 14, 2018, 03:45:26 AM
#21
For people that all in and can't afford for things to dip then, I think it is a huge issue. But otherwise, I actually think it is a blessing.
jr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 3
May 14, 2018, 03:10:56 AM
#20
member
Activity: 196
Merit: 10
Open and Transparent Science Powered By Blockchain
May 14, 2018, 02:59:17 AM
#19
I also find it difficult to use bitcoin as a stable currency.
More often just as a zero sum game.
newbie
Activity: 82
Merit: 0
May 14, 2018, 02:34:42 AM
#18
Bitcoin has launched lightening network which would make blockckain network fast and reduces the cost involved in transection. Also Bitcoin can fall 30% to its top value, while other Crypto can fall 10% of their top value So Bitcoin is more stable than other Crypto.
sr. member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 355
May 14, 2018, 02:27:09 AM
#17
Volatility isnt a issue when it comes to bitcoin/crypto investors because there are many other types of volatile investments too.  People take issue with volatility because bitcoin is mean to be used as a currency and if its value keeps changing then merchants cant rely on it as an accepted payment method.

Volatility in connection with Bitcoin can be viewed negatively or positively depending on the person or the type of person we are talking with. I am sure that traders are quite happy with Bitcoin's volatility because it can be an opportunity to earn more money but can be viewed in apposite by a newbie investor that can be rattled fast with the movement of Bitcoin value in the marketplace. Many merchants are also worried about volatility though there are now many ways they can protect their Bitcoin. Less volatility is not actually a guarantee that Bitcoin can be reaching the very mainstream population so the bottom line is that we just have to leave it to the market on what it will decide on this matter.
member
Activity: 322
Merit: 12
May 14, 2018, 02:14:35 AM
#16
It is an issue of course because everyone is vigilant with the bitcoin price everyday, but its volatility is also a part of its market fluctuation that we have to pass thru and that cannot be avoided situation, we just have to stay positive and believe that bitcoin is going live and lasts and it is worth investing and one day you will enjoy your profit also😊
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1032
All I know is that I know nothing.
May 14, 2018, 01:54:08 AM
#15
i think you are confusing two things. volatility being an issue and volatility making bitcoin useless. there is a big difference between these two. volatility is an issue but at the same time the merchants/businesses will continue to accept it and people will continue to use bitcoin as payment (the millions of dollar that is being processed by the merchants is proving that.
but if volatility stopped and bitcoin became more stable then this usage will be increased by a lot which is showing it IS an issue.
legendary
Activity: 3542
Merit: 1965
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
May 14, 2018, 01:48:41 AM
#14
While I agree with you that volatility should not influence the store of value, I would disagree with you that it influences the merchants, when they accept Bitcoin directly. Some people cancel out this disadvantage by using payment processors for any payments that are received, but this is not the perfect solution.

The best way to avoid volatility is for you to change strategy. Take say 20% of all bitcoins received and hoard them and convert the other 80% to fiat, almost immediately to avoid too much volatility.
newbie
Activity: 112
Merit: 0
May 14, 2018, 01:47:49 AM
#13
but it's still concerning lots of people tbh, you juat can't pretend like it ain't there?
hero member
Activity: 1834
Merit: 759
May 14, 2018, 01:42:14 AM
#12

  • Each Bitcoin transaction is a zero-sum game -- one party benefits to the same extent that the other does not benefit. So one party is guaranteed always to be fine with the volatility. And neither party knows for sure (or at all) who that beneficiary will be.

You don't think this is a big issue at all? A small business with razor thin margins could very easily lose money and lose the capability to pay their suppliers in case of a slide. That alone makes accepting it unnecessarily risky and very far from ideal. It's fine peer-to-peer, but when you have an obligation to pay and a business to run, it's a significant variable you could just do away with. They could use a payment processor to mitigate the risks, but that also defeats the purpose.

Volatility could very well be a deal breaker in a few scenarios. While I acknowledge that it gets blown out of proportion here and there, it's certainly not a non-issue. If it works for you, and it does for most of us, great. That doesn't mean it will work for everyone else though. Volatility is a problem that can presumably be solved by time and adoption, and shouldn't be swept under the rug.
member
Activity: 1302
Merit: 25
May 14, 2018, 01:30:25 AM
#11
The volatility is really an issue. An issue in the sense that it is usually the base currency and naturally, it should be so. It should not border traders though. It rules and control the other cryptocurrencies.
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1163
Where is my ring of blades...
May 14, 2018, 01:22:11 AM
#10
I like Uberse's style. He stealthily included Ethereum in the article in a sentence that says both BTC and ETH are good stores of value lol.

Ethereum is not a good store of value because what it promises to deliver will not be delivered. Lets watch how long they can keep the ongoing scam last.

good catch. they usually do this! they make an article which is about bitcoin at heart but they slyly include another altcoin's name in it to say this article is also covering that altcoin.
the fact is ethereum is one of the worst things you can invest in, not because of its volatility but because it is inflationary. there is no stopping that. the cap which should have been there is not there and there will be an unlimited number of Ethers in existence eventually. the future of it looks something like future of Doge coin.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1387
May 14, 2018, 01:01:15 AM
#9
My opinion is that if bitcoin was not so volatile that wouldnt suit traders.
Traders love the volatility, well experienced traders that is, the ones who
Can read the charts etc.

And if bitcoin was not so volatile there could probably be mor acceptance
in the marketplace for it to be used as a currency.
Pages:
Jump to: