There are a few non biased people I've seen comment in the scam accusation section, but what happens if we have a panel of judges on here? Possible corruption could happen and the "judges" might be able to be bought either by the casino or by the accuser. If we could keep the corruption out of it then it might be a good idea, but I don't think it's going to happen.
One of the main issues that would really be possibly to happen on which people could really be bought whether they would really be going against or would really be trying out to defend and there's no way that
we could really be able to know on whose been telling the truth and whose not which this is really that something would really be that hard to point out and if we do really just simply making out some basis.
Therefore, it wont really be that a sure thing that having some complaint panel would really be definitely be that effective or something that would really be able to resolved such issue.
This is a problem in between user and the platform on which making up some solutions and negotiations would really be just in between this two.
Taking up this to another level in terms of legal aspects then it would really be a different story and people on this community wouldnt be able to do something like this.
We could only post opinions but not able to give out those kind of conclusions on whose right and wrong.