Author

Topic: BitcoinWisdom.com - Live Bitcoin/LiteCoin Charts - page 128. (Read 502647 times)

legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
The site didn't hold very well under the intense load this weekend, I guess you noticed.

Do you have plans to increase your infrastructure? I know, it's not a cheap thing, so how about the following idea: if you need to invest in more bandwidth/servers, you could make a "donation drive", say: you tell us you need x BTC to buy another server (or upgrade whatever is necessary), and we can track how far we are with that goal, so we can donate towards that end.

Makes sense?
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 505
Hey,

I love your service and have subscribed. Good work! Smiley

Only one thing bugs me though. The little lines at the end which give a snapshot of the order book are, IMHO, the wrong colours. The top one (sell bids) I think should be red (a large sell wall is generally considered bad), and the lower ones (the buy bids) should be green (again, a large buy wall is generally considered good - like a green candlestick indicating a rising market). At present the reverse is true.

It is possible that I've confused which line is which (I assessed that by comparing the shapes to current order books), but in that case the lines are in the wrong positions; the sell wall should be on the top (it is a ceiling) and the buy wall should be on the bottom (it is a floor).

Kate.
Thanks for suggestion. You might be right, when I added it, I not only consider it is a depth but also a trends as part of candlestick chart. It has been used for very long time, I have no idea  it should be change or not. most of people won't worry about it and use it as first impression.
The confusion I think it is rare, most of us should be use position instead of color to identify it is bid or ask.
full member
Activity: 153
Merit: 100
Hey,

I love your service and have subscribed. Good work! Smiley

Only one thing bugs me though. The little lines at the end which give a snapshot of the order book are, IMHO, the wrong colours. The top one (sell bids) I think should be red (a large sell wall is generally considered bad), and the lower ones (the buy bids) should be green (again, a large buy wall is generally considered good - like a green candlestick indicating a rising market). At present the reverse is true.

It is possible that I've confused which line is which (I assessed that by comparing the shapes to current order books), but in that case the lines are in the wrong positions; the sell wall should be on the top (it is a ceiling) and the buy wall should be on the bottom (it is a floor).

Kate.
legendary
Activity: 1455
Merit: 1033
Nothing like healthy scepticism and hard evidence
Great service, thanks.
Support for drawing lines would be the most important addition.


Its not much but it gets the job done:

http://chovy.dyndns.org/chartdraw/chartdraw.html

It might be a good idea to announce it here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=84.0
Nothing like reviews to inspire trust (javascript applications create some fears).
member
Activity: 132
Merit: 14
Co-Founder of TheStandard.io & Vaultoro.com
Thanks for getting the Chinese exchanges in there man.
Any chance of getting a native android app of bitcoin wisdom.
I would pay 5 bucks for it for sure. Its just with touch the web version is a bit clunky.

Also I think it's a good idea to leave all the other alts out for now. There are so many scam coins out there. I like being diversified into 2 competent blockchains BTC and LTC as they both have really great dev teams but all the other coins seem like a me to delusion of scams.
newbie
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
SUPER SWEEEEET!!!!

You added the BTC-e PPC/USD pair and the NMC/USD pair!!!!!

Super appreciated!!! you rock!!!
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
Yes 48 GH/s like it is on chart, but the page says Hashrate(?):   48,487 MH/s

The comma in this case is not a decimal separator, which is I think where the confusion comes from.

In some countries: 48,487 = 48487
In other countries: 48,487 = about 48 and a half. And 48487 is written with a period as grouping separator: 48.487.

BitcoinWisdom uses the first form.
Thank you for explain.


Ahh, didnt think about that... Tnx.
newbie
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
Great service, thanks.
Support for drawing lines would be the most important addition.


Its not much but it gets the job done:

http://chovy.dyndns.org/chartdraw/chartdraw.html
legendary
Activity: 1455
Merit: 1033
Nothing like healthy scepticism and hard evidence
Great service, thanks.
Support for drawing lines would be the most important addition.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 505
Yes 48 GH/s like it is on chart, but the page says Hashrate(?):   48,487 MH/s

The comma in this case is not a decimal separator, which is I think where the confusion comes from.

In some countries: 48,487 = 48487
In other countries: 48,487 = about 48 and a half. And 48487 is written with a period as grouping separator: 48.487.

BitcoinWisdom uses the first form.
Thank you for explain.
Also I found the useful wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_mark talk about it.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 505
Yes 48 GH/s like it is on chart, but the page says Hashrate(?):   48,487 MH/s

The comma in this case is not a decimal separator, which is I think where the confusion comes from.

In some countries: 48,487 = 48487
In other countries: 48,487 = about 48 and a half. And 48487 is written with a period as grouping separator: 48.487.

BitcoinWisdom uses the first form.
Thank you for explain.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
Yes 48 GH/s like it is on chart, but the page says Hashrate(?):   48,487 MH/s

The comma in this case is not a decimal separator, which is I think where the confusion comes from.

In some countries: 48,487 = 48487
In other countries: 48,487 = about 48 and a half. And 48487 is written with a period as grouping separator: 48.487.

BitcoinWisdom uses the first form.
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
Yes 48 GH/s like it is on chart, but the page says Hashrate(?):   48,487 MH/s
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 505
Hello , great site, just a little mistake at LTC Network hashrate:

http://bitcoinwisdom.com/litecoin/difficulty


Hashrate(?):   48,487 MH/s

It should be in GH/s

Cheers.

The hashrate is correct. the average of hashrate is 48 GH/s in 504 blocks
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
Hello , great site, just a little mistake at LTC Network hashrate:

http://bitcoinwisdom.com/litecoin/difficulty


Hashrate(?):   48,487 MH/s

It should be in GH/s

Cheers.
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
Awesome graphs. This is truly professional grade charts. I fell like a WS trader now !
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1000
Far superior to anything else

Clarkmoody, Bitcointicker.co, Bitcoinity...

Tip incoming...
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 505
The charts are great man.  Best charts in town.  I keep at least 4 streaming 16/hrs a day.


A neat feature would be a console of sliders to control MA/EMA's etc. so you could watch them bend and see inflection points develop.

any interest in dev on a streaming order book heatmap?  Let me know, I'll start a thread. 

same data, new presentation

volume as opacity
buys / sells red and green
big buys/sells yellow
transactions white

3 sliders each Y time and X price scale: location, zoom, and log scale









keep up the good work

hold crypto!

litepresence

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?434452-Peercoin-PPCusd-pair-added-BTCe-exchange-PPCbtc-soars
http://trollboxarchive.com/search.php
It looks cool, but it doesn't fit BitcoinWisdom.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 505
Amazing work!
Would be really handy to have QRK/BTC from one of the exchanges like cryptsy, Coins-E or BTER as they have open ready public data. I'm sure the Quark community would reward you for the integration. Personally i would, just provide an address Wink
I'm sorry. I'm afraid it cannot be added currently. QuarkCoin's market cap is not large enough.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 505
hy,
is it possible that on the bitfinex chart you display every trade (bitstamp and bitfines) but the order book is only bitfinet?
i just saw this:

Trade @ 1095 but Wall of 37.992 @ 1089
I think not. Bitfinex API doesn't include it.
Jump to: