So right now you only have 3 miners working for this group. most of my 25 shares are in miners 2 and 3 which are working as we type. 20 of my 25 shares are in hand hashing.
a one or two or even three day delay to get up to 8 miners is not a big deal. But suppose it takes 10 days.
Are we saying miners 1,2,3 score and 4,5,6,7,8, don't score. Or are we being kind and sharing the wealth. So all of group 2 is getting 3/8 hash rate.
The first way favors me the second way does not.
Like I said if it is a short time to go from 3/8 to 8/8 cool. I would be willing to share.
If I missed a policy ruling there are lots of posts so please be kind.
Hey Philip,
I had to look it up myself cause I wasn't sure anymore..
It seems we said that each miner on GB2 would count individually unlike GB1. For some reason that line of text is not in GB3. I quoted the line below:
The last difference is that each miner is counted treated individually because we don't know for sure they will be delivered at the same time. The first miner sold will therefore be the first miner to payout, but only to the shareholders of that miner (or of ADDICTION once it's issued). Which rougly means you have an advantage if you buy early!...
However... We would like to do a moral appeal on people in the first 3 miners to not hold us to that line (we hold 402 out of those 744 shares ourselves by the way).
The reason is that we really believe we will receive the remaining miners next week and the amount of administration involved to start mining for these three miners is significant (especially since we still need to withhold costs for the PSU's, transport and the btc/usd difference). It's hard enough as it is with us not receiving all miners as once. We really hope for your understanding in this. Also know that we've asked KnC if they will offer some form of compensation because the miners are late.
If it turns out to take a lot longer to receive the remaining miners we'll think of some way to make it work.
Cheers