Nah, it just averages the last 15 minutes, thats all. Look at your recent transactions here https://www.bitcoins.lc/stats
It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
[unitedminers]
name: unitedminers.com
mine_address: pool.unitedminers.com:8332
api_address: http://www.unitedminers.com/?action=statistics
api_method:re
api_key:Valid shares for current round:([,\d]+)
api_strip:','
role:mine
#CHANGE THIS
#unitedminers.com
user: workername
pass: workerpassword
yes we should. There can be a 2 - 5% difference (depending on total pool stale) and I'd rather get the numbers right.
Also I think everyone is very mean and horrible and cruel.
I also hope his server is immersed in mineral oil, or liquid nitrogen, or something.shouldn't we use the valid share count opposed to the total share count?Code:[unitedminers]
name: unitedminers.com
mine_address: pool.unitedminers.com:8332
api_address: http://www.unitedminers.com/?action=statistics
api_method:re
api_key:Valid shares for current round:([,\d]+)
api_strip:','
role:mine
#CHANGE THIS
#unitedminers.com
user: workername
pass: workerpassword
I guess so, but in the end there is a small difference between the twoshouldn't we use the valid share count opposed to the total share count?Code:[unitedminers]
name: unitedminers.com
mine_address: pool.unitedminers.com:8332
api_address: http://www.unitedminers.com/?action=statistics
api_method:re
api_key:Valid shares for current round:([,\d]+)
api_strip:','
role:mine
#CHANGE THIS
#unitedminers.com
user: workername
pass: workerpasswordlet's test the load balancing and redundancyHow does one enter the payout information in this new index.html?
i will add this (together with role changes)
this evening
for the time being you can just arrow your browser back, enter the payout info then hit refresh. worked fine as a hack.How does one enter the payout information in this new index.html?
i will add this (together with role changes)
this evening1)Payout info?
Um you don't. Flower is adding it soon or I'll add it once I get worker stuff going and the LP stuff as well.How does one enter the payout information in this new index.html?The website was getting slow then it sped up... I didn't get a api_disable though.got an api disabled with them.. i guess that means it was lagging?
and they only have 3 people mining right now
mtred is kicking ass today another block down.. 58 minutes
I'm considering disabling them. The website is already noticeably slower... And I haven't even mined on them yet.EDIT: Oh and I'm adding united miners. The frontpage gave me a lot of confidence in them. This should be funny.
Now that's just cruel...@c00w: Yes please! Long poll timings will be the next step in hopping I hope (and will also shock a few "normal" miners about the bad performance of some pool backends!). A unix style timestamp with 3 places after the comma should be fine I guess...
Oh, and I'll most likely also need the time stamp of the most recent block on blockexplorer (as a comparison and to rule out blocks that were not found by any monitored pool) by checking http://blockexplorer.com/q/getblockcount and then requesting that number via http://blockexplorer.com/b/[blocknumbergoeshere]
The best thing to have then would be a delta between LongPoll_received and Block_found for each pool, sorted from lowest to highest.
Something like:
4.123 deepbit
4.512 uswest.btcguild
5.012 mtred
etc.sukrim: I can do that in the default bitHopper if you like.
Oh and I noticed polmine and already fixed it. And added slush. Tell me how it goes.
EDIT: Oh and I'm adding united miners. The frontpage gave me a lot of confidence in them. This should be funny.Jump to: