Pages:
Author

Topic: BITMAIN announces Antpool - page 42. (Read 383003 times)

legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
September 28, 2015, 08:42:11 PM
Anybody see this one what a joke and people actually went for it. 5.5 GH/s come on BITMAIN are you kidding me !



https://bitmaintech.com/productDetail.htm?pid=00020150915040859863u4Bgg9SX069F
They only had 10. Priced under $5. Just to see if they have any bugs. What's so abhorrent about that?
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
September 28, 2015, 04:43:18 PM
Anybody see this one what a joke and people actually went for it. 5.5 GH/s come on BITMAIN are you kidding me !



https://bitmaintech.com/productDetail.htm?pid=00020150915040859863u4Bgg9SX069F
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
September 27, 2015, 12:43:17 AM
I am wondering if this share rate :  5.13K/256 is a good one to get with Antminer U3?

I am so noob at mining to understand this totally yet. I am doing this PPLNS way of mining after

PPS all afternoon.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
September 24, 2015, 09:53:37 AM
Most people don't look at the pool payout history.
This one isn't the highest Tongue

Could you point me to a good pool that supports XT?
Good pools don't support XT

 Cheesy

Didn't XT die yet?

This will explain everything: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vuW6tQ0218
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
September 24, 2015, 09:47:51 AM
Most people don't look at the pool payout history.
This one isn't the highest Tongue

Could you point me to a good pool that supports XT?
Good pools don't support XT

 Cheesy

Didn't XT die yet?
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
September 24, 2015, 09:31:52 AM
Most people don't look at the pool payout history.
This one isn't the highest Tongue

Could you point me to a good pool that supports XT?
Good pools don't support XT

LOL!

No, I guess we should leave that stuff to open-minded people like yourself.
legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
September 24, 2015, 09:08:07 AM
Most people don't look at the pool payout history.
This one isn't the highest Tongue

Could you point me to a good pool that supports XT?
Good pools don't support XT
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
September 24, 2015, 07:30:33 AM
Most people don't look at the pool payout history.
This one isn't the highest Tongue

Could you point me to a good pool that supports XT?
legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
September 24, 2015, 07:07:53 AM
Most people don't look at the pool payout history.
This one isn't the highest Tongue
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
September 24, 2015, 06:28:35 AM
... I believe that currently it is one of the best pools around.

Your opinion/belief is objectively wrong.  Any pool that not only causes significant problems in the network due to using SPV mining instead of a fully validating node, but then states openly that they have no plan to stop doing so after it has been shown to be a problem, is not even close to one of the best pools around.  This isn't debatable, it is objectively damaging to the network for a major pool to be doing this.

+100 Well said!

And this is not the only pool that is damaging to the bitcoin network, f2pool, among others, are doing the same thing. There are so many misconceptions about mining & pools on this forum, it's astounding. I do wish people would research more before choosing a pool & making such statements - biggest is definitely not best in the Bitcoin mining ecosystem, & is especially true in this case.

I suggest miners here read this:  https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/empty-blocks-1085800

I think most people mean "most profitable" when they say best. But antpools antisocial behavior is starting to push me away from it.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
September 24, 2015, 05:58:58 AM
... I believe that currently it is one of the best pools around.

Your opinion/belief is objectively wrong.  Any pool that not only causes significant problems in the network due to using SPV mining instead of a fully validating node, but then states openly that they have no plan to stop doing so after it has been shown to be a problem, is not even close to one of the best pools around.  This isn't debatable, it is objectively damaging to the network for a major pool to be doing this.

+100 Well said!

And this is not the only pool that is damaging to the bitcoin network, f2pool, among others, are doing the same thing. There are so many misconceptions about mining & pools on this forum, it's astounding. I do wish people would research more before choosing a pool & making such statements - biggest is definitely not best in the Bitcoin mining ecosystem, & is especially true in this case.

I suggest miners here read this:  https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/empty-blocks-1085800
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
September 24, 2015, 03:42:23 AM
... I believe that currently it is one of the best pools around.

Your opinion/belief is objectively wrong.  Any pool that not only causes significant problems in the network due to using SPV mining instead of a fully validating node, but then states openly that they have no plan to stop doing so after it has been shown to be a problem, is not even close to one of the best pools around.  This isn't debatable, it is objectively damaging to the network for a major pool to be doing this.

Are they SPV mining? The entire pool? What's the point of that? They must have good fiber somewhere in Beijing or even Hong Kong?
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
September 23, 2015, 07:19:18 PM
... I believe that currently it is one of the best pools around.

Your opinion/belief is objectively wrong.  Any pool that not only causes significant problems in the network due to using SPV mining instead of a fully validating node, but then states openly that they have no plan to stop doing so after it has been shown to be a problem, is not even close to one of the best pools around.  This isn't debatable, it is objectively damaging to the network for a major pool to be doing this.
hero member
Activity: 968
Merit: 515
September 23, 2015, 04:56:23 PM
I pretty much like this pool. Been using it since it opened and I believe that currently it is one of the best pools around.
I wouldn't call a pool that caused a serious fork one the best pools. Supporting chinese pools can also be dangerous when they reach more than 50% of all hashing power.
BTW: ckpool and bitminter are more profitable:
http://organofcorti.blogspot.de/ (shared tx fees not included).
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
September 22, 2015, 08:51:32 PM
I pretty much like this pool. Been using it since it opened and I believe that currently it is one of the best pools around.

I agree.  It has been pretty hard to beat this pool over the long haul.  But I also agree that it is tolerable for those that get frustrated to air their frustrations from time to time.  Eventually anyone who hangs in there will realize that the average earnings over time in the AntPool will win over most other pools.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1027
September 22, 2015, 08:20:34 PM
I pretty much like this pool. Been using it since it opened and I believe that currently it is one of the best pools around.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
September 21, 2015, 02:48:30 PM
I've run many servers over the past 25 years.  I have had my share of problems and always find it best to keep my customers informed, even when the news is not good.  I would think that AntPool could/should do the same if they want to attract people to use their pool and keep them.  I know they are a different culture than what I am use to here in the USA, but that won't stop me from being critical from time to time.  As I pointed out, I am not always critical.  I even tried to help them when they had their DDOS problems.

Pools, hardware manufactures, and other bitcoin companies come and go all the time.  BitMain is no different.  They just happen to be one of the biggest players right now.  I've bought a lot of their equipment and have experience working with their support staff.  I don't do all my mining with AntPool, but I do have several AntMiner machines on their pool so I watch their performance and constantly evaluate what is best for me.  When I don't think things are what they should be, I won't hesitate to say something because in this country, I am free to do so.  In this age, there is no excuse for not keeping customers uninformed.

I am not the type of person that complains at every opportunity.  I wish BitMain and AntPool well so we may all be successful.  I only complain because I want to see them do better.  I also try to praise from time to time when things go well.


What's been annoying me about the entire Bitcoin mining field is that the bar has been set so low by outright scams and companies like BFL, KnC and Hashfast that the idea that the remaining companies are to be held to anything resembling high standards is seen as unrealistic and even foolish.

Bitmain is a company you can trust to deliver the goods in a timely fashion. In any other industry this would be a given, but in Bitcoin it's seen as a miracle. And I guess it is, since nobody else is selling current gen gear. But that also means that we are supposed to just nod and smile when they launch one insane pricing regime after another.

First they priced their machines in BTC, and everyone who didn't buy their machines agreed that this was a great way to support BTC as a currency. We who were buying saw that prices went up when BTC went up. However, BTC didn't go up for long and this pricing regime was starting to work for the customers, but that, of course (it is genuinely perfectly understandable), couldn't last. Now they've made it clear that they basically will follow BTC when the price goes up, but not down. It all makes perfect sense if you know the Bitcoin community and Bitcoin companies, but in any other industry this would be seen as exploitative pricing and close to or actually illegal, depending on the jurisdiction.

So to push Bitmain to inform its customers better and improve their services, even if TTravis can be a bit quick to pull the trigger from time to time, should be welcomed; or at least endured.
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1001
September 21, 2015, 02:20:30 PM
Thats why you have the option of PPS.. yeah the 2% fee sucks, but your shielded from the bad luck days.. which seem abundant lately
full member
Activity: 165
Merit: 100
September 21, 2015, 11:48:24 AM
I've run many servers over the past 25 years.  I have had my share of problems and always find it best to keep my customers informed, even when the news is not good.  I would think that AntPool could/should do the same if they want to attract people to use their pool and keep them.  I know they are a different culture than what I am use to here in the USA, but that won't stop me from being critical from time to time.  As I pointed out, I am not always critical.  I even tried to help them when they had their DDOS problems.

Pools, hardware manufactures, and other bitcoin companies come and go all the time.  BitMain is no different.  They just happen to be one of the biggest players right now.  I've bought a lot of their equipment and have experience working with their support staff.  I don't do all my mining with AntPool, but I do have several AntMiner machines on their pool so I watch their performance and constantly evaluate what is best for me.  When I don't think things are what they should be, I won't hesitate to say something because in this country, I am free to do so.  In this age, there is no excuse for not keeping customers uninformed.

I am not the type of person that complains at every opportunity.  I wish BitMain and AntPool well so we may all be successful.  I only complain because I want to see them do better.  I also try to praise from time to time when things go well.





legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 2792
Enjoy 500% bonus + 70 FS
September 21, 2015, 11:25:45 AM
What for a bad luck :-(
Pages:
Jump to: