I don't think a mixer using a single address for every costumer and asking people to send a message with the tx id is going to work well. There is no way to prove that you are indeed the person who sent X bitcoins to the mixer address, and it's way too much work (and manual).
And as others pointed out, a self-moderated thread is not the best way to show up without any legacy of being trustable. Of course it's not a sign of scam, but it's not one of the best signs either.
I agree with your argument about the address and the process of mixing, that could and must be fixed, but a legendary member worth moreAnd as others pointed out, a self-moderated thread is not the best way to show up without any legacy of being trustable. Of course it's not a sign of scam, but it's not one of the best signs either.
why domain use bitmixer, same with old bitcoin mixer service , bitmixer.io
or this thread same company with bitmixer.io, only use new domain
It's not. It's a new service with a different teamor this thread same company with bitmixer.io, only use new domain
Than 0.01 or 0.02BTC don't you think? because if I ever want to use this mixer, I'd only send the minimum amounts at least for a month or two
Before trusting with 0.5+BTC in each transaction, however due to existence of other mixers such as chip and blender among other services the
Only thing standing on the OP's way to successfully replace and claim the number one rank of Bitmixer is the lack of advertisement. if you ask
Bitmixer.io's admin, I'm sure he'll tell you that he was sharing a huge percentage of his income with signature participants at least for the first
2 years and only his earnings started to grow exponentially in the last year of his running business which was 2016 and the first 4 months of 2017.
However problems with DNX of your site.
