2011-06-16 06:05:38: Listener for "Default": 16/06/2011 06:05:38, Problems communicating with bitcoin RPC
2011-06-16 06:05:44: Listener for "Default": 16/06/2011 06:05:44, Problems communicating with bitcoin RPC
2011-06-16 06:06:49: Listener for "Default": Traceback (most recent call last):
2011-06-16 06:06:49: Listener for "Default": File "BitcoinMiner.pyo", line 261, in longPollThread
2011-06-16 06:06:49: Listener for "Default": File "BitcoinMiner.pyo", line 236, in request
2011-06-16 06:06:49: Listener for "Default": File "json\__init__.pyo", line 307, in loads
2011-06-16 06:06:49: Listener for "Default": File "json\decoder.pyo", line 319, in decode
2011-06-16 06:06:49: Listener for "Default": File "json\decoder.pyo", line 338, in raw_decode
2011-06-16 06:06:49: Listener for "Default": ValueError: No JSON object could be decoded
2011-06-16 06:07:57: Listener for "Default": 16/06/2011 06:07:57, long poll exception:
Like that for pages & pages in my console.
Topic: Bitparking Namecoin Mining Pool [30 GHash/s] - page 2. (Read 20590 times)
I keep getting 504 (Gateway timeout) errors with jgarzik's cpuminer-1.0.2.
Anyone else getting really bad connection problems to this pool today?
Yep, me
Anyone else getting really bad connection problems to this pool today?
namecoind getgenerate
that will get you an address
I think getnewaddress is used when you already have an address
You can associate it with an account name, then solo mine
namecoind getnewaddress Chucksta
bitcoin.conf
-----------
rpcuser=Chucksta
rpcpassword=suckmyc00k1es
rpcport=8332
rpcallowip=198.xxx.xxx.xx1
rpcallowip=198.xxx.xxx.xx2
rpcallowip=198.xxx.xxx.xx3
daemon=1
that will get you an address
I think getnewaddress is used when you already have an address
You can associate it with an account name, then solo mine
namecoind getnewaddress Chucksta
bitcoin.conf
-----------
rpcuser=Chucksta
rpcpassword=suckmyc00k1es
rpcport=8332
rpcallowip=198.xxx.xxx.xx1
rpcallowip=198.xxx.xxx.xx2
rpcallowip=198.xxx.xxx.xx3
daemon=1
I could not get the receiving address.
I create the bitcoin.conf file
then I run the namecoind.exe in command prompt
then when I type "namecoind listreceivedbyaddress 0 true"
I got error like these
http://www.upload.ee/image/1418737/Untitled.jpg
pls help
I create the bitcoin.conf file
then I run the namecoind.exe in command prompt
then when I type "namecoind listreceivedbyaddress 0 true"
I got error like these
http://www.upload.ee/image/1418737/Untitled.jpg
pls help
Hey, I can't get a namecoin address. I did this step in windows 7
4. Create the "bitcoin.conf" file
Windows : file must be located in your application data folder \ namecoin
Linux : file must be located in ~/.namecoin
Populate "bitcoin.conf" with at least these lines :
rpcuser=your_user
rpcpassword=your_pass
rpcport=8336
daemon=1
But when in step 5 to 8, I typed "c:\namecoin_win32\namecoind.exe", there is no "bitcoin server starting" appear in the command prompt and I have no Idea what to do next. I read your blog but its in linux not in windows, anyone can help?
5. Start namecoind again
bitcoin server starting
6. List available commands:
Note : on windows, you may need to open a new terminal.
./namecoind help
7. Get your first namecoin address(es):
You will need an address if you want to receive namecoins.
./namecoind listreceivedbyaddress 0 true
8. Generate a new address:
./namecoind getnewaddress
4. Create the "bitcoin.conf" file
Windows : file must be located in your application data folder \ namecoin
Linux : file must be located in ~/.namecoin
Populate "bitcoin.conf" with at least these lines :
rpcuser=your_user
rpcpassword=your_pass
rpcport=8336
daemon=1
But when in step 5 to 8, I typed "c:\namecoin_win32\namecoind.exe", there is no "bitcoin server starting" appear in the command prompt and I have no Idea what to do next. I read your blog but its in linux not in windows, anyone can help?
5. Start namecoind again
bitcoin server starting
6. List available commands:
Note : on windows, you may need to open a new terminal.
./namecoind help
7. Get your first namecoin address(es):
You will need an address if you want to receive namecoins.
./namecoind listreceivedbyaddress 0 true
8. Generate a new address:
./namecoind getnewaddress
15071.20565385, are you kidding me? 
Can we use the same receiving address(worker name) for multiple mining GPUs?
Yes. 
Can we use the same receiving address(worker name) for multiple mining GPUs?
The errors are due to the long poller having problems. What's happening is there's so much computing power on the namecoin network right now, and difficulty hasn't adjusted yet, that blocks are being solved every 2 minutes or so. With the thousands of long polling clients it's taking longer than this to notify them of a new block. So multiple blocks go by before you get the notification. At some point the long poller server locks up. Things will calm down in a day or so when difficulty adjusts to match the network speed.
pool is down
I'm getting errors when I attempt to use poclbm:
Code:
13/06/2011 03:57:48, long poll exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "BitcoinMiner.pyo", line 259, in longPollThread
File "BitcoinMiner.pyo", line 234, in request
File "json\__init__.pyo", line 307, in loads
File "json\decoder.pyo", line 319, in decode
File "json\decoder.pyo", line 338, in raw_decode
ValueError: No JSON object could be decoded
13/06/2011 03:58:19, 9ec203b6, invalid or stale
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "BitcoinMiner.pyo", line 259, in longPollThread
File "BitcoinMiner.pyo", line 234, in request
File "json\__init__.pyo", line 307, in loads
File "json\decoder.pyo", line 319, in decode
File "json\decoder.pyo", line 338, in raw_decode
ValueError: No JSON object could be decoded
13/06/2011 03:58:19, 9ec203b6, invalid or stale
I was so angry, first time I sleep in ages, I wake up, the entire nights sleep was spent offline ffs
at least I found a block heh
I'm getting errors when I attempt to use poclbm:
Code:
13/06/2011 03:57:48, long poll exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "BitcoinMiner.pyo", line 259, in longPollThread
File "BitcoinMiner.pyo", line 234, in request
File "json\__init__.pyo", line 307, in loads
File "json\decoder.pyo", line 319, in decode
File "json\decoder.pyo", line 338, in raw_decode
ValueError: No JSON object could be decoded
13/06/2011 03:58:19, 9ec203b6, invalid or stale
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "BitcoinMiner.pyo", line 259, in longPollThread
File "BitcoinMiner.pyo", line 234, in request
File "json\__init__.pyo", line 307, in loads
File "json\decoder.pyo", line 319, in decode
File "json\decoder.pyo", line 338, in raw_decode
ValueError: No JSON object could be decoded
13/06/2011 03:58:19, 9ec203b6, invalid or stale
I recently rewrote the pool software to handle more load. You can still withdraw from the old pool account and I'll automatically withdraw the remaining amounts next week to those that haven't withdrawn. The new pool is operating at the same URL and port. Withdrawals from the old pool are available at http://oldpool.bitparking.com/pool. If you have any questions let me know.
I believe that's up to you, the address is simply the address you want to be paid out to, do you want everything in one address or to separate ones?
This is correct. Using the same address is fine. So is using different addresses. should i use different address for each miner or can i use same one for all of them?
I believe that's up to you, the address is simply the address you want to be paid out to, do you want everything in one address or to separate ones?
should i use different address for each miner or can i use same one for all of them?
EDIT:
Figured it out:
Address was created without account link.
Created new, and it just fine.
Figured it out:
Quote
Looks like it want recognize my address.
Maybe just not enough time was passed.
And - my netcoin address starts from M, not form N like stated on dot-bit.org.
Should i get a new one ?
Maybe just not enough time was passed.
And - my netcoin address starts from M, not form N like stated on dot-bit.org.
Should i get a new one ?
Address was created without account link.
Created new, and it just fine.
And back to 2 Ghash. The pool server handled the load, but did identify a bunch of places I need to tweak.
Jump to: