Soooo.. just like VISA...
With bitpay now, merchants will have to pay to use bitcoin as a payment processor..
+ Lmao at this 30 transactions/month threshold..
So much for merchant adoption!
edit: although that would have been a lot of frappucinos to bay back teh VCs!
Confused about the snark here.
Why exactly SHOULDN'T merchants have to pay to use a payment processor? Why should Bitpay offer their services to merchants for free?
Or is the idea that, ideologically, the costs "ought" to be borne either by the payment processor, or the purchasers, but not by the merchants? If so I'd need someone to help join the ideological dots for me there, and justify that "ought". It's not at all clear to me that merchants "ought" to be exempt from paying for services rendered to them.
one year ago:
so bitpay is a total failure.
there is not so much merchants nor volume going on over there. (+them noobs got phished $2M )
because bitcoin is not meant to compete with visa or paypal.
because "the mass" doesnt care about buying their frappucinos with bitcoin.
because they dont even care about the dollar.