I am not going to sit here and argue with you troll. Find another bitcoin roulette site that goes beyond "prob fair" using random.org or another third party.
First off we have not started accepting bets so we have not "scammed" anyone. You should not throw around false accusations so quickly without proof.
We have opened trials for users of the forum and have had some good feedback on the system.
We use white noise generated random numbers using a complete hardware setup, not a third party such as random.org making us the only "true random" generated setup on the net.
I suggest before you bad talk someones business you at least request a demonstration or give them try. Otherwise stay off my thread.
First off we have not started accepting bets so we have not "scammed" anyone. You should not throw around false accusations so quickly without proof.
We have opened trials for users of the forum and have had some good feedback on the system.
We use white noise generated random numbers using a complete hardware setup, not a third party such as random.org making us the only "true random" generated setup on the net.
I suggest before you bad talk someones business you at least request a demonstration or give them try. Otherwise stay off my thread.
hey, if you cant explain your claims of "provably fair" then you should not be making ANY.
I looked through your website before making this post, I couldnt see how a player is expected to verify their bet results - can you enlighten me ?
For a true provably fair roulette game see satoshiroulette.com 's implementation.
site secret that changes every 24h + users txid are used to generate the resulting spin.
That is NOT true random...
The closest/simplest way your going to get to TRUE RANDOM numbers is this "Below" based on a generator that uses avalanche noise. Which if you search the net has passed all almost all randomness tests. The others you are listing are Pseudo Random. For example downloading random images off google images and counting all of the black pixels would be considered "random" but not "true random". This might be a little over your head... I would do some reading before trying to call someone out. And as I listed in my previous post I would like a LIVE VIDEO FEED of our hardware in version 2 with a digital print out. I am not out to "scam" I am only out to change the scene. This is a hobby for me not my day job.
Don't get so seriousss.
reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noise_%28electronics%29#Avalanche_noise
reference: http://www.maximintegrated.com/app-notes/index.mvp/id/3469
I will however appease you and put all of this information on the website along with infographs and simplistic diagrams explaining how it works.
Thanks!
correct, but it is provably fair random which yours is not.
Im thrilled to see you sampling "your balls humidity level" to generate the seed for your RNG but we still need a way for players to verify their results which you are not demonstrating.
Additionally players need to be able to set their own seed if you really want to claim provably fair for random number games.
As I said before we have not opened for actual BTC betting and I am not here to get in a dick swinging contest. I am pretty sure I said we are TRUE RANDOM and no where on our site or this forum does it use the term "provably fair" regarding our business. So you should have stated that before you would play you would want to know that we are as you say "provably fair" and of course we will do that before opening for monetary betting. You just have a bad way of approaching people.
There is inconsistency in your posts and defamation.
1. We do not claim the term Provably Fair - "This does not make us a scam"
2. We have not opened for monetary betting - "This does not make us a scam"
3. We never denied that we would prove random results. - "This does not make us a scam"
How about instead of "swinging your balls in the wind" you tell us what you would like to see and we will provide it. It is called constructive criticism...I can take it.
Well, It appears I may need to eat some humble pie.
Please, excuse my terrible approach to these concerns I have raised.
May we start again and address some key concerns:
1) You claim "The First And Only True Random Online Roulette", casino.bit (think thats the one) uses a real roulette table which I would argue is true random.
At this point it is hair splitting but I would argue you are not the first "true random".
2) I see in your reply you do have plans to provide a method for players to verify their roles, this is ideal.
3) Will players be able to set their own client seed ?
