Pages:
Author

Topic: Bitstamp will easily recover from this hack - page 2. (Read 4103 times)

legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
the problem is not the recovery

the problem is the security breach..

how so?

recovery is being able to have enough funds to cover a $5million loss.
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
the problem is not the recovery

the problem is the security breach..
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
18000 BTC is not chump change - how many days of trading it takes to recover the loss?

Secondly, people will lose confidence and go to other exchanges and their market share isn't that big to begin with.

Other than doing something very drastic like no fee or 0.05% fee, I see them be relegated into irrelevance.
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
A lot of people are saying that this is the end of Bitstamp. That they've been goxed and that any bitcoins held on the site are now gone. This isn't true. Bitstamp WILL easily recover from this hack. It sucks that this happened, but this isn't really a huge disaster and it should by no means affect the survivability of the company.

On the 5th of January, Bitstamp lost 18,000 BTC from a 200,000 BTC reserve. That's about 9% of the total reserve.

Percentage-wise, this is very similar to the hack that Poloniex suffered in 2014. It lost 12% of its bitcoins due to a technical glitch which was exploited by a hacker. That exchange was able to recover its reserves in just mere months. It has enjoyed a spotless security record since then.

In August 2014, Bter also lost 50 million NXT worth about $1.6 million due to a hacker. After a while, they were eventually able to recover 42 million NXT making their net loss 8 million NXT and a couple hundred BTC which they sold to the hacker for bargain prices in exchange for the return of the bulk of the stolen NXT. Today, they're still operating perfectly fine.

Bitstamp has had $10 million injected into it from venture capitalist/hedge fund firm Pantera. So as a last resort, they could use this money to refund its customers. Bitstamp earns millions of dollars every year from trading fees. The majority of their coins are held in cold storage. Mike Hearn, a trusted Bitcoin dev audited their BTC reserves several months ago and confirmed that everything looked OK. The fact that only 9 percent of all funds were stolen means that the security benefits of separating hot and cold wallets is working. Services like MyBitcoin, inputs.io, and Mt. Gox that failed to properly separate the two have seen the majority of their funds disappear. From the look of this hacking incident, it is clear that Bitstamp is not making the same mistake.

TL:DR; Your deposits are safe. There is no need to worry.

Bitstamp will easily recover from this hack

easily? Nope. Looks like more delays and excuses.  Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1001
If there is a bank run on stamp they might not..  IMO the longer they wait to open the more intense the run will be.
I would rather expect a wallet run as the coins are the most vunerable when kept on an exchange, not fiat.


In the short term I agree with you. But in the mid term less fiat will arrive, new customers will be scary to deposit there. So, it will hurt bitcoin price slowly.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 254
i want my btc instantly when i press the withdraw button or at least know its available when i want it back

This is part of the problem for exchanges.  People want their money instantly when they hit withdraw.  Meaning they need large sums in their hot wallet.  Its generally the hot wallet that gets hacked.

Vicious circle as traders will flock to the most insecure exchanges who have large hot wallets and when said exchanges get hacked the damage is much greater
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1004
5 million dollars is a huge amount to cover out of pocket unless they were making insane amounts of yearly revenue off fees.
You have a point, but Stamp's financial health looks okay as of the last published auditing cycle: http://companycheck.co.uk/company/08157033/BITSTAMP-LIMITED/company-summary

That's quite impressive, but I'm guessing those total figures are mostly comprised by the sum of the customer coins held.  I'd be interested to know their actual revenue figures from the past 2 years after employee/server/maintenance costs.

The question is...do they really have the integrity to stick with this and be willing to work basically free of charge and at a personal cost loss for the next few months, if not years...just to pay back the stolen funds?  My gut tells me no...which is why this scenario almost always plays out the same way. Whether or not this was an inside job, from a logical perspective there are very few business owners that would be willing to take that kind of hit, especially knowing it's already a sinking ship.

It's like people with burried with outrageous personal debts with a meager job salary.  That's why filing for bankruptcy is such a common practice nowadays especially in the current financial climate.


According to the Bitstamp financial statement, the 2013 profit was around of 800,000 USD. Even they hide all the figures, let's say 2 mil usd profit/year. It's too less to cover the loss.
5 MIL USD are a lot of money. 500K are a lot of money but 5 MIL is huge Smiley

Bistamp will drag down Ripple with them. Take the popcorn and look to the show that it will come soon. Smiley


you mean ripple the platform...?  nope, that will never happen.  bitstamp is just a gateway as far as the ripple network is concerned.  the price of XRP could go down tho, that i give you.


Bitstamp is related-interconnected with Ripple;same gang. One of the Bitstamp's directors (Morehead) is owning Ripple. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1401
Merit: 1008
northern exposure
well i dont know if this will be the end of Bitstamp but for sure, if they want to come back, will be hard for them, just ask yourselft if they be able to survive a withdraw run after they open, hard, this will be hard for them.

Some people compare what happend to them with polo, but never forget that is a different situation, who know how is going on with bitstamp? why do you think they will recover as polo did? im not sure about that... different companys, different situations...

Btw about his "hack" i really think this was a internal job, same as mtgox, but is only a feeling Tongue
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000
Si vis pacem, para bellum
If bitcoin price goes down, they will easily recover the loss in a couple of months, however if the price keeps going up, then they would need to operate in fractional reserve mode for a very long time

who will ever  agree to put their btc in a fractional reserve system ??
especially one thats already been negligent enough to be hacked for millions of dollars worth

i want my btc instantly when i press the withdraw button or at least know its available when i want it back
and not involved in some fractional system  that doesnt even have enough balance to break even ...............

short off a miracle ,i think the writing is on the wall for bitstamp ,even if they repaid everyone ,the trust is gone .......
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000
If there is a bank run on stamp they might not..  IMO the longer they wait to open the more intense the run will be.
member
Activity: 105
Merit: 10
Yes they're

Look at price of bitcoin now
legendary
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1012
Beyond Imagination
If bitcoin price goes down, they will easily recover the loss in a couple of months, however if the price keeps going up, then they would need to operate in fractional reserve mode for a very long time
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1824
They may be big but not big enough to recover from a 5.2 million loss (if it was a real hack )

customer trust will be non-existant after this so even if they worked for free
for the next few years (which they probably wont or cant )  the fees would be so low it would take forever to recover this loss

(if they cant protect their own coins/money  ,im not trusting them to protect mine etc  )

communication has been pretty bad apart from the odd tweet telling people not to worry when we need a bit more than that
they wont even comment on the exact total of coins in storage etc

far easier to claim bankrupt ,blame the hacker and retire with the loot (if they have it )

 or open again under a different name and start again fresh and free from debts and obligations

I agree with you.
They lost their credibility in the bitcoin world and credibility is everything in money business!
They may have no other choice but to start again, under new name or as completely different company.
legendary
Activity: 3976
Merit: 1421
Life, Love and Laughter...
5 million dollars is a huge amount to cover out of pocket unless they were making insane amounts of yearly revenue off fees.
You have a point, but Stamp's financial health looks okay as of the last published auditing cycle: http://companycheck.co.uk/company/08157033/BITSTAMP-LIMITED/company-summary

That's quite impressive, but I'm guessing those total figures are mostly comprised by the sum of the customer coins held.  I'd be interested to know their actual revenue figures from the past 2 years after employee/server/maintenance costs.

The question is...do they really have the integrity to stick with this and be willing to work basically free of charge and at a personal cost loss for the next few months, if not years...just to pay back the stolen funds?  My gut tells me no...which is why this scenario almost always plays out the same way. Whether or not this was an inside job, from a logical perspective there are very few business owners that would be willing to take that kind of hit, especially knowing it's already a sinking ship.

It's like people with burried with outrageous personal debts with a meager job salary.  That's why filing for bankruptcy is such a common practice nowadays especially in the current financial climate.


According to the Bitstamp financial statement, the 2013 profit was around of 800,000 USD. Even they hide all the figures, let's say 2 mil usd profit/year. It's too less to cover the loss.
5 MIL USD are a lot of money. 500K are a lot of money but 5 MIL is huge Smiley

Bistamp will drag down Ripple with them. Take the popcorn and look to the show that it will come soon. Smiley


you mean ripple the platform...?  nope, that will never happen.  bitstamp is just a gateway as far as the ripple network is concerned.  the price of XRP could go down tho, that i give you.
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000
Si vis pacem, para bellum
They may be big but not big enough to recover from a 5.2 million loss (if it was a real hack )

customer trust will be non-existant after this so even if they worked for free
for the next few years (which they probably wont or cant )  the fees would be so low it would take forever to recover this loss

(if they cant protect their own coins/money  ,im not trusting them to protect mine etc  )

communication has been pretty bad apart from the odd tweet telling people not to worry when we need a bit more than that
they wont even comment on the exact total of coins in storage etc

far easier to claim bankrupt ,blame the hacker and retire with the loot (if they have it )

 or open again under a different name and start again fresh and free from debts and obligations
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1004
5 million dollars is a huge amount to cover out of pocket unless they were making insane amounts of yearly revenue off fees.
You have a point, but Stamp's financial health looks okay as of the last published auditing cycle: http://companycheck.co.uk/company/08157033/BITSTAMP-LIMITED/company-summary

That's quite impressive, but I'm guessing those total figures are mostly comprised by the sum of the customer coins held.  I'd be interested to know their actual revenue figures from the past 2 years after employee/server/maintenance costs.

The question is...do they really have the integrity to stick with this and be willing to work basically free of charge and at a personal cost loss for the next few months, if not years...just to pay back the stolen funds?  My gut tells me no...which is why this scenario almost always plays out the same way. Whether or not this was an inside job, from a logical perspective there are very few business owners that would be willing to take that kind of hit, especially knowing it's already a sinking ship.

It's like people with burried with outrageous personal debts with a meager job salary.  That's why filing for bankruptcy is such a common practice nowadays especially in the current financial climate.


According to the Bitstamp financial statement, the 2013 profit was around of 800,000 USD. Even they hide all the figures, let's say 2 mil usd profit/year. It's too less to cover the loss.
5 MIL USD are a lot of money. 500K are a lot of money but 5 MIL is huge Smiley

Bistamp will drag down Ripple with them. Take the popcorn and look to the show that it will come soon. Smiley
hero member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 783
better everyday ♥
I don't know if Bitstamp will easily recover from this hack, not actually the right word to use.

It will take some time, to repair the customers trust, basically operating at a loss trying to cover the theft, and hopefully sustain long enough to regain liquidity over time.

Step 1 is reopening and making sure customers wallets are secured.  Everything after that is gravy, including worst case filing for bankruptsy.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
5 million dollars is a huge amount to cover out of pocket unless they were making insane amounts of yearly revenue off fees.
You have a point, but Stamp's financial health looks okay as of the last published auditing cycle: http://companycheck.co.uk/company/08157033/BITSTAMP-LIMITED/company-summary

That's quite impressive, but I'm guessing those total figures are mostly comprised by the sum of the customer coins held.  I'd be interested to know their actual revenue figures from the past 2 years after employee/server/maintenance costs.

The question is...do they really have the integrity to stick with this and be willing to work basically free of charge and at a personal cost loss for the next few months, if not years...just to pay back the stolen funds?  My gut tells me no...which is why this scenario almost always plays out the same way. Whether or not this was an inside job, from a logical perspective there are very few business owners that would be willing to take that kind of hit, especially knowing it's already a sinking ship.

It's like people with burried with outrageous personal debts with a meager job salary.  That's why filing for bankruptcy is such a common practice nowadays especially in the current financial climate.
sr. member
Activity: 700
Merit: 250
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
5 million dollars is a huge amount to cover out of pocket unless they were making insane amounts of yearly revenue off fees.
You have a point, but Stamp's financial health looks okay as of the last published auditing cycle: http://companycheck.co.uk/company/08157033/BITSTAMP-LIMITED/company-summary
sr. member
Activity: 700
Merit: 250
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
Percentage-wise, this is very similar to the hack that Poloniex suffered in 2014. It lost 12% of its bitcoins due to a technical glitch which was exploited by a hacker. That exchange was able to recover its reserves in just mere months. It has enjoyed a spotless security record since then.
Not quite. Tristan made a 12% (or so) across-the-board deduction of every account with a BTC balance.
Repayments were then made weekly for a few months.
And I seem to remember another hack there involving Counterparty by a Brazilian hotel cleaner, IIRC.

Why did Stamp shut down all fiat withdrawals, if this was just a "bitcoin hack"?  Cheesy  Roll Eyes
That is what I would like an answer to. There should be no directly linked reason to the btc hack that involves USD/fiat wires being halted.
Another big red flag.
That's the big question. It's very suspicious that Bitstamp is evading answering it.

It's also a concern that Bitstamp's replies, on Twitter and on their own site, are increasingly vague about when they will be back up.

If they try to bring trading back up while limiting withdrawals, assume they're crooks.

Stamp is mirroring its whole system to a location in San Francisco. I don't know if this is for auditing, a redundancy measure or a prelude to a move from Slovenia.
But it involves the entire system, not just the Bitcoin infrastructure. The process was estimated to take between 24-48 hours.

I hope what is more important is that after the incident at least they know where the loopholes are and have taken the measures to upgrade their security. Also, what I'm interested is how the coins get lost to the attacker? SQL injection, I'm not sure... but certainly it's not that easy to get hacked in the first place.
Stamp initially thought it was a server-related issue, and did not immediately react to the situation. Investigations, with the involvement of local LEAs, are underway.


Interestingly though, the thieves were very generous to miners. In this tx, the fee is 1 BTC.
Pages:
Jump to: