Again, to my knowledge all information that is publicly available about GAW was released by people who had legal access to it. If you know otherwise, I think you should make that accusation somewhere that it is relevant.
Unless you are going to invest in BitStone I think it is best to FUD somewhere else. Legal access to it does not mean it was not stolen PAUL - Josh Garza did not release those emails
At present I am trying to get answers to some things proclaimed in the BitStone Whitepaper and here in this thread which do not make any sense. I will make my own informed decision on whether or not I will proceed with any investment after doing my own investigation. I have not recieved a proper answer to a single question posed so far. Along those lines, I am still waiting for an answer to this last question that I have about this coin, as it appears to actually be an unregistered security:
If this coin is representing value of real property of the members issuing and selling this coin, does that make it a security? From what I can see, it looks like the "coins" are actually shares in the corporation of those in control of this coin and gives those who buy them a share of the capital of the "coin team" (corporation). If this is the case, has this corporation been properly filed and is this security registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission? Have all of the legal hurdles been properly attended to? If you think this does not qualify as a security, then can you please explain why the members of the "coin team" (corporation) think this is not the case.
That is a lie Paul, you have made a lot of accusations of this being a scam - you have no intention of investing -
I will ask that you please refrain from making a baseless accusation against me. I will state with 100% conviction and clarity that if I can prove to my satisfaction that this coin is completely legitimate and will definitely return a handsome profit I will invest in it. If you prefer to invest without getting proper answers to questions about that which you are sinking your hard earned
BTC into, you are quite welcome to do so.
Edit to add:
Paul is a moron -
Here is what a security is PAUL - Buying Haslets was the issue with GAW, I do believe.
A financial instrument that represents: an ownership position in a publicly-traded corporation (stock), a creditor relationship with governmental body or a corporation (bond), or rights to ownership as represented by an option. A security is a fungible, negotiable financial instrument that represents some type of financial value. The company or entity that issues the security is known as the issuer.
Read more:
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/security.asp#ixzz3dctAD02S People respect what you and Suchmoon did with GAW, but now you are on a power trip and think you have the right to police ALL crypto - You do not, and I am certain that in this country (USA) you are innocent until proven guilty. And please be honest, what attracted you to FUD this coin?
Does this coin represent shares (stock) in a corporation of individuals or not? I asked this very simple question, and you are not the one to answer it, unless of course, you are one of the coin devs using a sock puppet account right now. I think this coin and the way the backing (gem CAF) is structured could indeed make it be viewed as a security. To me this is an important question, and I will ask that you please refrain from insulting me for asking a simple and direct question of importance.
